bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Sep-05 03:24 UTC
[Bug 620] Address bits are backwards when setting up port forwarding on Solaris/intel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-09-05 13:24 ------- Reminder: we need to know if we can detect this at build time so we can set BROKEN_GETADDRINFO where necessary. Does attachment #359 detect the problem on Solaris/x86? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Sep-05 05:59 UTC
[Bug 620] Address bits are backwards when setting up port forwarding on Solaris/intel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 ------- Additional Comments From jrhett at isite.net 2003-09-05 15:59 ------- It seems to think so: % gcc -lsocket -o test test.c % ./test Loopback sane Sorry for the delay ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Sep-05 06:01 UTC
[Bug 620] Address bits are backwards when setting up port forwarding on Solaris/intel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 ------- Additional Comments From jrhett at isite.net 2003-09-05 16:01 ------- Er, it seems to think not. Sorry. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Sep-05 08:29 UTC
[Bug 620] Address bits are backwards when setting up port forwarding on Solaris/intel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 ------- Additional Comments From dtucker at zip.com.au 2003-09-05 18:29 ------- Created an attachment (id=384) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=384&action=view) Show htonl() output Maybe the problem is in the htonl() macro? What does the attached program give? On Solaris/SPARC (bigendian) I get: htonl 7f000001 ntohl 7f000001 On an Linux/i386 (little endian) I get: htonl 100007f ntohl 100007f Your Solaris/x86 box should give the same results as Linux, however I suspect it will give the same as the SPARC. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Sep-05 08:39 UTC
[Bug 620] Address bits are backwards when setting up port forwarding on Solaris/intel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 ------- Additional Comments From jrhett at isite.net 2003-09-05 18:39 ------- Nope, it seems to mirror Linux: % ./test htonl 100007f ntohl 100007f ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
bugzilla-daemon at mindrot.org
2003-Sep-05 15:21 UTC
[Bug 620] Address bits are backwards when setting up port forwarding on Solaris/intel
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 jrhett at isite.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From jrhett at isite.net 2003-09-06 01:21 ------- Bug is not a bug. Problem was tester, not test. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.