http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630 Summary: built-in ssh-rand-helper Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: aet at cc.hut.fi OpenSSH 3.1p1 introduced ssh-rand-helper, a subprocess to gather randomness for legacy OS's that still don't have /dev/urandom. Sadly here at HUT/CC as well we have a few mission critical servers that need ssh-rand-helper, but a static linking instead of external subprocess with hardcoded exec paths is preferred. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630 ------- Additional Comments From aet at cc.hut.fi 2003-08-26 02:59 ------- Created an attachment (id=373) --> (http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=373&action=view) This patch modifies ssh-rand-helper source, so that you can link randomness code staticly, like OpenSSH 3.0.2p1 used to do as only option. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-08-26 10:51 ------- Thanks, but we are trying to move the responsability for randomness collection further away from OpenSSH, rather than closer in. It just doesn't make sense for each app to do its own entropy collection. I'd prefer to deprecate ssh-rand-helper entirely and give all the responability to OpenSSL, but that is a matter for another release :) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630 ------- Additional Comments From aet at cc.hut.fi 2003-08-26 23:32 ------- Ah, that's good to hear. :) Maybe I'll glue out some issues with prngd in the future and use it with OpenSSL, so that I won't have to maintain ugly patch like this anymore. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 629] sshd_config & PAM backwards compatibility
- [Bug 220] sshd fails to read other users authorized_keys over nfs as root
- [Bug 237] Key authentication failed with SSH 2 / Path wrong
- openssh 5.0p1: Solaris - Failed to allocate internet-domain X11 display socket.
- ssh-rand-helper