Ian Brown
2006-Feb-06 10:01 UTC
[xen-discuss] Paravirtualization in Solaris - SPARC and x86
Hello, X86 is notoriously known for being difficult in the virtualizations aspect. There are some commands which , as Xen papers , describe it , "fail silently" , which means that they don''t create General Protection Violation. See also: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec2000/full_papers/robin/robin_html/index.html Are SPARC processors more difficult than x86 or less difficult , in this aspect of "sensitive instructions", which trap silently? Are there any intentions from SUN to develop processors with virtualization support (like Intel VT-x/VT-i and AMD SVM/pacifica)? Are there any intentions to release the Solaris Xen source in the near future? Regards, IB This message posted from opensolaris.org
Richard Elling
2006-Feb-06 23:59 UTC
[xen-discuss] Re: Paravirtualization in Solaris - SPARC and x86
> X86 is notoriously known for being difficult in the > virtualizations aspect....and other aspects, too :-)> There are some commands which , as Xen papers , describe it , "fail silently" , > which means that they don''t create General Protection Violation. > > See also: > http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec2000/full_papers/robin/robin_html/index.html > > Are SPARC processors more difficult than x86 or less difficult , in this aspect > of "sensitive instructions", which trap silently? > > Are there any intentions from SUN to develop processors with virtualization > support (like Intel VT-x/VT-i and AMD SVM/pacifica)?Yes, see the white papers describing the SPARC architecture changes and hypervisor at: http://opensparc.sunsource.net/nonav/opensparct1.html -- richard This message posted from opensolaris.org