ogg dev - May 2008 - [PATCH] liboggplay - kate support, build fixes, and misc

> There seems to be some inconsistency in the changes to the type of
> sample_in_record and its accessor: the field was changed from int to
> ogg_int64_t in src/liboggplay/oggplay_callback_info.h, and the return
> type of the accessor function was changed from int to long in the
> corresponding .c file and public header.
Having heard no more about this, I'll make a patch that returns ogg_int64_t,
and hope Python likes it, is it OK ?

2008/5/1 ogg.k.ogg.k at googlemail.com <ogg.k.ogg.k at
googlemail.com>:
> > There seems to be some inconsistency in the changes to the type of
>  > sample_in_record and its accessor: the field was changed from int to
>  > ogg_int64_t in src/liboggplay/oggplay_callback_info.h, and the return
>  > type of the accessor function was changed from int to long in the
>  > corresponding .c file and public header.
>
>  Having heard no more about this, I'll make a patch that returns
ogg_int64_t,
>  and hope Python likes it, is it OK ?
I'll be happy with that -- there are other functions which expose
ogg_int64_t also, so I assume it's ok ...

Conrad.

> I'll be happy with that -- there are other functions which expose
> ogg_int64_t also, so I assume it's ok ...
Oh ? Ahem. I need to check more thoroughly next time. :)
I'll try to post that tomorrow.
thanks