ogg dev - Mar 2008 - [PATCH] oggmerge, various

On 18/03/2008, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 3/17/08, ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com <ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>  > I'm not sure how to go about testing whether they're correct,
>  > I know of no tools that check this.
>
>
> From the oggztools, oggz-validate should check properly for any errors.
should, but doesn't [check that Skeleton is correct] (yet).

Conrad.

I'm testing this.  Meanwhile, a brief question, do you really want
Kate's media type to be "application" as opposed to
"text"?

-Ivo

> I'm testing this. Meanwhile, a brief question, do you really want
> Kate's media type to be "application" as opposed to
"text"?
Thanks.

About the media type, my understanding was that text was for actual text,
not binary that could be decoded into text. If you think another would be
more appropriate, please tell which. If it would be text/x-kate, I'd see
that
more for the textual representation, eg:

kate {
  event {
    from 0:0:0 to 0:1:0 "Hello, world!"
  }
}

I quickly had a search and found:
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc1341/4_Content-Type.html
which seems to corroborate the use of "text/foo" for actual text.
However,
I'm not very familiar with all of this, so I'm happy to be corrected and
the
content type to be changed.