Michael M.
2008-Jan-03 08:47 UTC
[Ocfs2-users] Possibility for networkless installation (for long distance shared storage)
As we have fiber channel, and we have fiber connections, sometimes direct p-to-p, where we could run it into our fiber channel switch, and share a disk array over hundreds of feet, to hundreds of miles, but where servers wouldn't be able to talk via fast enough network connection, does (or will) ocfs2 support a mode where there is no network connection needed, and all voting, and cluster "talking" can be done to the block device itself, including the heartbeat? This would allow me to share files between datacenters. Thanks, Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20080103/19f1fe13/attachment.html
Mark Fasheh
2008-Jan-03 09:13 UTC
[Ocfs2-users] Possibility for networkless installation (for long distance shared storage)
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:47:37AM -0800, Michael M. wrote:> As we have fiber channel, and we have fiber connections, sometimes direct > p-to-p, where we could run it into our fiber channel switch, and share a disk > array over hundreds of feet, to hundreds of miles, but where servers wouldn?t > be able to talk via fast enough network connection, does (or will) ocfs2 > support a mode where there is no network connection needed, and all voting, and > cluster ?talking? can be done to the block device itself, including the > heartbeat?Ocfs (v1) used to do that, but we moved away from it for Ocfs2 because it quickly became unusably slow once all the additional locking traffic for general purpose usage was added. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh Principal Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com
Luis Freitas
2008-Jan-03 10:35 UTC
[Ocfs2-users] Possibility for networkless installation (for long distance shared storage)
Michael, You might be able to route IP over your FC network. I know that some unixes do this, but I am not sure on how to do it on Linux. Regards, Luis Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote: On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:47:37AM -0800, Michael M. wrote:> As we have fiber channel, and we have fiber connections, sometimes direct > p-to-p, where we could run it into our fiber channel switch, and share a disk > array over hundreds of feet, to hundreds of miles, but where servers wouldn???t > be able to talk via fast enough network connection, does (or will) ocfs2 > support a mode where there is no network connection needed, and all voting, and > cluster ???talking??? can be done to the block device itself, including the > heartbeat?Ocfs (v1) used to do that, but we moved away from it for Ocfs2 because it quickly became unusably slow once all the additional locking traffic for general purpose usage was added. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh Principal Software Developer, Oracle mark.fasheh@oracle.com _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-users mailing list Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-users/attachments/20080103/e551ec1c/attachment.html