hello, on my system debian 64,vanilla kernel 2.6.22.3 with Ocfs2 patch set and ocfs2 1.2.1 (testing package), i 've tried to increase the number of slots,with tunefs.ocfs2 -n 8 , it's does not pass very well. there is a problem for the journal as you can see : echo "ls -l //" | debugfs.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdc1 |grep journal 55 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0000 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0001 57 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0002 58 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0003 59 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0004 76 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:11 journal:0005 77 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:12 journal:0006 97 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 19:02 journal:0007 i upgrade the debian package (unstable) it's now ocfs2 1.2.3 , and i tried tunefs.ocfs2 -J size=320M /dev/sdc1 tunefs.ocfs2 1.2.3 Changing journal size 268435456 to 335544320 Proceed (y/N): y Updating journal:0005... tunefs.ocfs2: Internal logic faliure while creating journal:0005 at block 76 of 5120 clusters during journal resize tunefs.ocfs2: Internal logic faliure while updating journal size 55 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0000 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0001 57 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0002 58 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0003 59 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0004 76 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:11 journal:0005 77 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:12 journal:0006 97 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 19:02 journal:0007 fsck.ocfs2 -f -y /dev/sdc1 repair some things and said it's clean. but it's always impossible to change the size of the journal size for 5,6,7. any chance to recover the good size for the journal without formatting ? thank you for your help. -- Christophe Bouder, LIP6 CNRS 104 avenue du pr?sident Kennedy, F75016 Paris tel: 0144273718 fax: 0144277000
That's not good. Does the device have enough free space? File a bugzilla with the details already provided. Also attach the output of the stat_sysdir.sh script. http://oss.oracle.com/~smushran/.debug/scripts/stat_sysdir.sh Christophe Bouder wrote:> hello, > on my system debian 64,vanilla kernel 2.6.22.3 with Ocfs2 patch set and > ocfs2 1.2.1 (testing package), > i 've tried to increase the number of slots,with tunefs.ocfs2 -n 8 , > it's does not pass very well. > there is a problem for the journal as you can see : > > echo "ls -l //" | debugfs.ocfs2 -n /dev/sdc1 |grep journal > > 55 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0000 > 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0001 > 57 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0002 > 58 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0003 > 59 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 268435456 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0004 > 76 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:11 journal:0005 > 77 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:12 journal:0006 > 97 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 19:02 journal:0007 > > > i upgrade the debian package (unstable) it's now ocfs2 1.2.3 , > and i tried > tunefs.ocfs2 -J size=320M /dev/sdc1 > tunefs.ocfs2 1.2.3 > Changing journal size 268435456 to 335544320 > Proceed (y/N): y > Updating journal:0005... > tunefs.ocfs2: Internal logic faliure while creating journal:0005 at > block 76 of 5120 clusters during journal resize > tunefs.ocfs2: Internal logic faliure while updating journal size > > 55 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0000 > 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0001 > 57 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0002 > 58 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0003 > 59 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 335544320 23-Jun-2007 21:29 journal:0004 > 76 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:11 journal:0005 > 77 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 18:12 journal:0006 > 97 -rw-r--r-- 1 0 0 0 18-Aug-2007 19:02 journal:0007 > > fsck.ocfs2 -f -y /dev/sdc1 repair some things > and said it's clean. > but it's always impossible to change the size of the journal size for > 5,6,7. > any chance to recover the good size for the journal without formatting ? > > thank you for your help. >