Mounting by label with multiple paths works quite well in red Hat. All you need
to do is create an /etc/fstab.order file with all of your devices listed. Check
out this snippet from the mount manpage.
DUPLICATE LABELS
mount includes support for systems where same partition is shared
between different devices (e.g. multipath kernel drivers). In particular case
when mounting device by LABEL, mount command reports problem with duplicate
labels. You can define priority of devices in file /etc/fstab.order as simple
list of devices (with full pathname for the devices). The devices listed in
this file have greater priority than other devices. Devices in configuration
file have descending priority.
-Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: ocfs2-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com
[mailto:ocfs2-users-bounces@oss.oracle.com] On Behalf Of
ballester.david@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 1:27 AM
To: Martin Norland
Cc: ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
Subject: RE: [Ocfs2-users] Problem installing CRS [OT]
El mar, 06-03-2007 a las 21:32 -0500, Martin Norland escribi?:
> As for the label= mounting - I can't mount with labels because
> powerpath presents each device multiple times, so multiple devices
> always have that label. I've not seen anyone present a solution for
> this, but admittedly I didn't dig long.
Yes, I've worked with ( not installed ) several storage systems ( IBM
FastT, HP, EMC...) and will never understand why powerpath do the things
in this way. I think that is really stupid and must have an important
reason to present devices as it do, or emc technicians in my country
doesn't know very good the product.
Regards
D.
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-users mailing list
Ocfs2-users@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-users
The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of anyvirus,
worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and its
attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the message
and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for
taking protective and remedial action about viruses and other defects. The
sender's employer is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way
from this message or its attachments.