Darrick J. Wong
2016-Dec-12 18:09 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 1/7] ocfs2: test reflinking to inline data files
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 05:01:20PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:> On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 01:52:51PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Make sure that we can handle reflinking from and to inline-data files. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong at oracle.com> > > --- > > common/reflink | 2 + > > tests/ocfs2/001 | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > tests/ocfs2/001.out | 14 ++++++++ > > tests/ocfs2/Makefile | 20 +++++++++++ > > tests/ocfs2/group | 1 + > > 5 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100755 tests/ocfs2/001 > > create mode 100644 tests/ocfs2/001.out > > create mode 100644 tests/ocfs2/Makefile > > create mode 100644 tests/ocfs2/group > > > > > > diff --git a/common/reflink b/common/reflink > > index 9d51729..d048045 100644 > > --- a/common/reflink > > +++ b/common/reflink > > @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ _cp_reflink() { > > file1="$1" > > file2="$2" > > > > - cp --reflink=always -p "$file1" "$file2" > > + cp --reflink=always -p -f "$file1" "$file2" > > I'm still seeing "File exists" error with this patch, tested with your > ocfs2-vfs-reflink-6 branch, compiled on openSUSE Tumbleweed. > > FSTYP -- ocfs2 > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 bootp-73-5-234 4.9.0-rc8.djwong-ocfs2+ > MKFS_OPTIONS -- --fs-features=local /dev/sda5 > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda5 /mnt/testarea/scratch > > ocfs2/001 - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//ocfs2/ocfs2/001.out.bad) > --- tests/ocfs2/001.out 2016-12-12 13:51:38.053909486 +0800 > +++ /root/xfstests/results//ocfs2/ocfs2/001.out.bad 2016-12-12 16:49:35.038882697 +0800 > @@ -1,14 +1,18 @@ > QA output created by 001 > +mkfs.ocfs2 1.8.4I guess I'll have to neuter this on newer ocfs2-tools. (Still running 1.6.4 here).> Format and mount > Create the original files > reflink into the start of file2 > +cp: failed to reflink '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file2' from '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file1': File exists > reflink past the stuff in file3 > ... > (Run 'diff -u tests/ocfs2/001.out /root/xfstests/results//ocfs2/ocfs2/001.out.bad' to see the entire diff) > > --- tests/ocfs2/001.out 2016-12-12 13:51:38.053909486 +0800 > +++ /root/xfstests/results//ocfs2/ocfs2/001.out.bad 2016-12-12 16:44:31.991943842 +0800 > @@ -1,14 +1,18 @@ > QA output created by 001 > +mkfs.ocfs2 1.8.4 > Format and mount > Create the original files > reflink into the start of file2 > +cp: failed to reflink '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file2' from '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file1': File exists > reflink past the stuff in file3 > reflink an inline-data file to a regular one > +cp: failed to reflink '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file5' from '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file4': File exists > reflink an inline-data file to another inline-data file > +cp: failed to reflink '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file6' from '/mnt/testarea/scratch/test-001/file4': File exists > Verify the whole mess > 2d61aa54b58c2e94403fb092c3dbc027 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file1 > -2d61aa54b58c2e94403fb092c3dbc027 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file2 > +401b30e3b8b5d629635a5c613cdb7919 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file2 > 4e68a2e24b6b0f386ab39d01d902293d SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file3 > 009520053b00386d1173f3988c55d192 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file4 > -009520053b00386d1173f3988c55d192 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file5 > -009520053b00386d1173f3988c55d192 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file6 > +2d61aa54b58c2e94403fb092c3dbc027 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file5 > +60b725f10c9c85c70d97880dfe8191b3 SCRATCH_MNT/test-001/file6 > > I did the "reflink into the start of file2" test manually, and strace > showed that it is file1 reports EEXIST. > > open("/mnt/ocfs2/testfile1", O_RDONLY) = 3 > fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0600, st_size=65536, ...}) = 0 > ioctl(3, _IOC(_IOC_WRITE, 0x6f, 0x04, 0x18), 0x7ffc8daf09f0) = -1 EEXIST (File exists)Wait, that's the ocfs2 reflink ioctl, not FICLONE. Well that explains why the functional parts of the tests fail. I looked at latest coreutils source, which does not use OCFS2_IOC_REFLINK, so I guess this must be an opensuse thing? --D> > The same test on XFS works fine. Did I miss anything? > > Thanks, > Eryu