jiangyiwen
2015-Sep-09 01:55 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Fill-in the unused portion of the block with zeros by dio_zero_block()
A simplified test case is (this case from Ryan): 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/hello bs=512 count=1 oflag=direct; 2) truncate /mnt/hello -s 2097152 file 'hello' is not exist before test. After this command, file 'hello' should be all zero. But 512~4096 is some random data. Setting bh state to new when get a new block, if so, direct_io_worker()->dio_zero_block() will fill-in the unused portion of the block with zero. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index 1a35c61..bd106b9 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, ret = -EIO; goto bail; } + set_buffer_new(bh_result); } /* -- 1.8.3.4
Joseph Qi
2015-Sep-09 02:13 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Fill-in the unused portion of the block with zeros by dio_zero_block()
On 2015/9/9 9:55, jiangyiwen wrote:> A simplified test case is (this case from Ryan): > 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/hello bs=512 count=1 oflag=direct; > 2) truncate /mnt/hello -s 2097152 > file 'hello' is not exist before test. After this command, > file 'hello' should be all zero. But 512~4096 is some random data. > > Setting bh state to new when get a new block, if so, > direct_io_worker()->dio_zero_block() will fill-in the unused portion > of the block with zero. > > Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com>Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com>> --- > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > index 1a35c61..bd106b9 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, > ret = -EIO; > goto bail; > } > + set_buffer_new(bh_result); > } > > /* >
Zhen Ren
2015-Sep-09 05:16 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Fill-in the unused portion of the block with zeros by dio_zero_block()
Hi Yiwen, I try to reproduce this case, but it didn't act like you describe. What I did: ==laptop:/mnt/shared # mount | grep ocfs2 ocfs2_dlmfs on /dlm type ocfs2_dlmfs (rw,relatime) /dev/sda3 on /mnt/shared type ocfs2 (rw,relatime,_netdev,heartbeat=local,nointr,data=ordered,errors=remount-ro,atime_quantum=60,coherency=full,user_xattr,acl) laptop:/mnt/shared # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/shared/hello bs=512 count=1 oflag=direct 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes (512 B) copied, 0.000684382 s, 748 kB/s laptop:/mnt/shared # truncate hello -s 2097152 laptop:/mnt/shared # cat hello ======> nothing laptop:/mnt/shared # uname -r 3.16.7-21-desktop == Did I do something wrong? If I misunderstand, please correct me. Thanks. >>>> A simplified test case is (this case from Ryan): > 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/hello bs=512 count=1 oflag=direct; > 2) truncate /mnt/hello -s 2097152 > file 'hello' is not exist before test. After this command, > file 'hello' should be all zero. But 512~4096 is some random data. > > Setting bh state to new when get a new block, if so, > direct_io_worker()->dio_zero_block() will fill-in the unused portion > of the block with zero. > > Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > index 1a35c61..bd106b9 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode > *inode, sector_t iblock, > ret = -EIO; > goto bail; > } > + set_buffer_new(bh_result); > } > > /*-- Eric, Ren
ryding
2015-Sep-10 01:53 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Fill-in the unused portion of the block with zeros by dio_zero_block()
Hi Yiwen, I'm working on this issue. The patch will be send out soon. And the issue that do not support file hole will be fixed too. I have proved it can pass all ltp-aiodio test cases, and has better performance. ;-) Thanks, Ryan On 09/09/2015 09:55 AM, jiangyiwen wrote:> A simplified test case is (this case from Ryan): > 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/hello bs=512 count=1 oflag=direct; > 2) truncate /mnt/hello -s 2097152 > file 'hello' is not exist before test. After this command, > file 'hello' should be all zero. But 512~4096 is some random data. > > Setting bh state to new when get a new block, if so, > direct_io_worker()->dio_zero_block() will fill-in the unused portion > of the block with zero. > > Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > index 1a35c61..bd106b9 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, > ret = -EIO; > goto bail; > } > + set_buffer_new(bh_result); > } > > /*
Andrew Morton
2015-Sep-14 22:13 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: Fill-in the unused portion of the block with zeros by dio_zero_block()
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:55:16 +0800 jiangyiwen <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> wrote:> A simplified test case is (this case from Ryan): > 1) dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/hello bs=512 count=1 oflag=direct; > 2) truncate /mnt/hello -s 2097152 > file 'hello' is not exist before test. After this command, > file 'hello' should be all zero. But 512~4096 is some random data. > > Setting bh state to new when get a new block, if so, > direct_io_worker()->dio_zero_block() will fill-in the unused portion > of the block with zero. > > ... > > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t iblock, > ret = -EIO; > goto bail; > } > + set_buffer_new(bh_result); > } >You're working against an old kernel. I did this: --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c~ocfs2-fill-in-the-unused-portion-of-the-block-with-zeros-by-dio_zero_block +++ a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static int ocfs2_direct_IO_get_blocks(st ret = -EIO; goto bail; } + set_buffer_new(bh_result); up_write(&OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_alloc_sem); } Probably we could run set_buffer_new() after the up_write(), which would decrease lok hold times a little bit.