Junxiao Bi
2015-Apr-30 06:16 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] ocfs2/dlm: fix race between purge and get lock resource
On 04/25/2015 06:44 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:> There is a race between purge and get lock resource, which will lead to > ast unfinished and system hung. The case is described below: > > mkdir dlm_thread > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > o2cb_dlm_lock | > -> dlmlock | > -> dlm_get_lock_resource | > -> __dlm_lookup_lockres_full | > -> spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock) | > | dlm_run_purge_list > | -> dlm_purge_lockres > | -> dlm_drop_lockres_ref > | -> spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock) > | -> spin_lock(&res->spinlock) > | -> ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF > | -> spin_unlock(&res->spinlock) > | -> spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock) > -> spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock)| > DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF cleared | > -> spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock) | > return the purged lockres | > > So after this, once ast comes, it will ignore the ast because the > lockres cannot be found anymore. Thus the OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY won't be > cleared and corresponding thread hangs. > The &dlm->spinlock was hold when checking DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF at > the very beginning. And commit 7b791d68562e ("ocfs2/dlm: Fix race during > lockres mastery") moved it up because of the possible wait. > So take the &dlm->spinlock and introduce a new wait function to fix the > race.The fix to this issue seemed a little complicated. Indeed this is a similar issue with commit cb79662bc2f83f7b3b60970ad88df43085f96514 ("ocfs2: o2dlm: fix a race between purge and master query"), we can reference that fix. How about the following fix? diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c index a6944b2..25314d2 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c @@ -757,6 +757,18 @@ lookup: if (tmpres) { spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock); + + /* + * Right after dlm spinlock was released, dlm_thread could have + * purged the lockres. Check if lockres got unhashed. If so + * start over. + */ + if (hlist_unhashed(&tmpres->hash_node)) { + spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); + dlm_lockres_put(tmpres); + goto lookup; + } + /* Wait on the thread that is mastering the resource */ if (tmpres->owner == DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) { __dlm_wait_on_lockres(tmpres); Thanks, Junxiao.> > Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com> > Reviewed-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei at huawei.com> > Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> > --- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 2 ++ > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 13 +++++++++---- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h > index e88ccf8..c6b76f4 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h > @@ -1014,6 +1014,8 @@ void dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, > > /* will exit holding res->spinlock, but may drop in function */ > void __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags(struct dlm_lock_resource *res, int flags); > +void __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, > + struct dlm_lock_resource *res, int flags); > > /* will exit holding res->spinlock, but may drop in function */ > static inline void __dlm_wait_on_lockres(struct dlm_lock_resource *res) > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c > index a6944b2..9a5f45d 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c > @@ -755,13 +755,16 @@ lookup: > spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); > tmpres = __dlm_lookup_lockres_full(dlm, lockid, namelen, hash); > if (tmpres) { > - spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); > spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock); > /* Wait on the thread that is mastering the resource */ > if (tmpres->owner == DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) { > - __dlm_wait_on_lockres(tmpres); > + __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(dlm, tmpres, > + (DLM_LOCK_RES_IN_PROGRESS| > + DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING| > + DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING)); > BUG_ON(tmpres->owner == DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN); > spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); > + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); > dlm_lockres_put(tmpres); > tmpres = NULL; > goto lookup; > @@ -770,9 +773,10 @@ lookup: > /* Wait on the resource purge to complete before continuing */ > if (tmpres->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF) { > BUG_ON(tmpres->owner == dlm->node_num); > - __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags(tmpres, > - DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF); > + __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(dlm, tmpres, > + DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF); > spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); > + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); > dlm_lockres_put(tmpres); > tmpres = NULL; > goto lookup; > @@ -782,6 +786,7 @@ lookup: > dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(dlm, tmpres); > > spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); > + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); > if (res) > dlm_lockres_put(res); > res = tmpres; > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c > index 69aac6f..505730a 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c > @@ -77,6 +77,29 @@ repeat: > __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > } > > +void __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, > + struct dlm_lock_resource *res, int flags) > +{ > + DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); > + > + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock); > + assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock); > + > + add_wait_queue(&res->wq, &wait); > +repeat: > + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); > + if (res->state & flags) { > + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); > + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); > + schedule(); > + spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); > + spin_lock(&res->spinlock); > + goto repeat; > + } > + remove_wait_queue(&res->wq, &wait); > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > +} > + > int __dlm_lockres_has_locks(struct dlm_lock_resource *res) > { > if (list_empty(&res->granted) &&
Joseph Qi
2015-Apr-30 07:04 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] ocfs2/dlm: fix race between purge and get lock resource
Hi Junxiao, On 2015/4/30 14:16, Junxiao Bi wrote:> On 04/25/2015 06:44 PM, Joseph Qi wrote: >> There is a race between purge and get lock resource, which will lead to >> ast unfinished and system hung. The case is described below: >> >> mkdir dlm_thread >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> o2cb_dlm_lock | >> -> dlmlock | >> -> dlm_get_lock_resource | >> -> __dlm_lookup_lockres_full | >> -> spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock) | >> | dlm_run_purge_list >> | -> dlm_purge_lockres >> | -> dlm_drop_lockres_ref >> | -> spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock) >> | -> spin_lock(&res->spinlock) >> | -> ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF >> | -> spin_unlock(&res->spinlock) >> | -> spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock) >> -> spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock)| >> DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF cleared | >> -> spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock) | >> return the purged lockres | >> >> So after this, once ast comes, it will ignore the ast because the >> lockres cannot be found anymore. Thus the OCFS2_LOCK_BUSY won't be >> cleared and corresponding thread hangs. >> The &dlm->spinlock was hold when checking DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF at >> the very beginning. And commit 7b791d68562e ("ocfs2/dlm: Fix race during >> lockres mastery") moved it up because of the possible wait. >> So take the &dlm->spinlock and introduce a new wait function to fix the >> race. > The fix to this issue seemed a little complicated. > > Indeed this is a similar issue with commit cb79662bc2f83f7b3b60970ad88df43085f96514 ("ocfs2: o2dlm: fix a race between purge and master query"), we can reference that fix. How about the following fix? > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c > index a6944b2..25314d2 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c > @@ -757,6 +757,18 @@ lookup: > if (tmpres) { > spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); > spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock); > + > + /* > + * Right after dlm spinlock was released, dlm_thread could have > + * purged the lockres. Check if lockres got unhashed. If so > + * start over. > + */ > + if (hlist_unhashed(&tmpres->hash_node)) { > + spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); > + dlm_lockres_put(tmpres); > + goto lookup; > + } > + > /* Wait on the thread that is mastering the resource */ > if (tmpres->owner == DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) { > __dlm_wait_on_lockres(tmpres); > > Thanks, > Junxiao.Thanks very much for the above fix. It looks good to me and much simpler than my fix. A small suggestion is setting tmpres to NULL after dlm_lockres_put to keep consistency. Could you please send a new version?>> >> Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at huawei.com> >> Reviewed-by: joyce.xue <xuejiufei at huawei.com> >> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> >> --- >> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 2 ++ >> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c | 13 +++++++++---- >> fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h >> index e88ccf8..c6b76f4 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h >> @@ -1014,6 +1014,8 @@ void dlm_move_lockres_to_recovery_list(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, >> >> /* will exit holding res->spinlock, but may drop in function */ >> void __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags(struct dlm_lock_resource *res, int flags); >> +void __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, >> + struct dlm_lock_resource *res, int flags); >> >> /* will exit holding res->spinlock, but may drop in function */ >> static inline void __dlm_wait_on_lockres(struct dlm_lock_resource *res) >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c >> index a6944b2..9a5f45d 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c >> @@ -755,13 +755,16 @@ lookup: >> spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); >> tmpres = __dlm_lookup_lockres_full(dlm, lockid, namelen, hash); >> if (tmpres) { >> - spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); >> spin_lock(&tmpres->spinlock); >> /* Wait on the thread that is mastering the resource */ >> if (tmpres->owner == DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) { >> - __dlm_wait_on_lockres(tmpres); >> + __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(dlm, tmpres, >> + (DLM_LOCK_RES_IN_PROGRESS| >> + DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING| >> + DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING)); >> BUG_ON(tmpres->owner == DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN); >> spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); >> + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); >> dlm_lockres_put(tmpres); >> tmpres = NULL; >> goto lookup; >> @@ -770,9 +773,10 @@ lookup: >> /* Wait on the resource purge to complete before continuing */ >> if (tmpres->state & DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF) { >> BUG_ON(tmpres->owner == dlm->node_num); >> - __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags(tmpres, >> - DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF); >> + __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(dlm, tmpres, >> + DLM_LOCK_RES_DROPPING_REF); >> spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); >> + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); >> dlm_lockres_put(tmpres); >> tmpres = NULL; >> goto lookup; >> @@ -782,6 +786,7 @@ lookup: >> dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(dlm, tmpres); >> >> spin_unlock(&tmpres->spinlock); >> + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); >> if (res) >> dlm_lockres_put(res); >> res = tmpres; >> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c >> index 69aac6f..505730a 100644 >> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c >> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c >> @@ -77,6 +77,29 @@ repeat: >> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); >> } >> >> +void __dlm_wait_on_lockres_flags_new(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, >> + struct dlm_lock_resource *res, int flags) >> +{ >> + DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current); >> + >> + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->spinlock); >> + assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock); >> + >> + add_wait_queue(&res->wq, &wait); >> +repeat: >> + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); >> + if (res->state & flags) { >> + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); >> + spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); >> + schedule(); >> + spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); >> + spin_lock(&res->spinlock); >> + goto repeat; >> + } >> + remove_wait_queue(&res->wq, &wait); >> + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); >> +} >> + >> int __dlm_lockres_has_locks(struct dlm_lock_resource *res) >> { >> if (list_empty(&res->granted) && > > > . >