Stephen Rothwell
2014-Apr-07 04:52 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
Hi all, After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig) failed like this: fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits': fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits(bit_off, num_bits); ^ I have no idea how to track this down :-( The only patches affecting this code are now in Linus' tree. I can only assume that some implicitly included header file is no longer included. I have just left it broken for now. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/attachments/20140407/9ea969f6/attachment-0001.bin
Andrew Morton
2014-Apr-07 18:26 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:52:42 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:> Hi all, > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c: In function 'ocfs2_block_group_set_bits': > fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c:1357:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > trace_ocfs2_block_group_set_bits(bit_off, num_bits); > ^ > > I have no idea how to track this down :-( The only patches affecting this > code are now in Linus' tree. I can only assume that some implicitly > included header file is no longer included. I have just left it broken > for now.I can't reproduce this with either mainline or linux-next. Pulled half an hour ago, powerpc allyesconfig.