Joseph Qi
2013-Nov-05 08:20 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: why not set EROFS when clearing bits multiple times
In ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits, when num_bits != bits_cleared, it just log an error message without setting EROFS. The code is below: /* * If encountered, it means we are clearing bits multiple times. While * we are handling the case, we still need to be alerted to its * occurrence. Hence, marking it as an ERROR and not NOTICE. */ if (num_bits != bits_cleared) { mlog(ML_ERROR, "Trying to clear %u bits at offset %u in group " "descriptor # %llu (device %s), needed to clear %u bits\n", num_bits, bit_off, (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(bg->bg_blkno), alloc_inode->i_sb->s_id, bits_cleared); } If this case happens, does it mean the filesystem have already been inconsistent? If so, why not set EROFS when this case happens? Or anyone knows which case will casue bits to be cleared multiple times? Thanks very much.
Srinivas Eeda
2013-Nov-05 23:48 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] ocfs2: why not set EROFS when clearing bits multiple times
On 11/05/2013 12:20 AM, Joseph Qi wrote:> In ocfs2_block_group_clear_bits, when num_bits != bits_cleared, it just > log an error message without setting EROFS. > > The code is below: > > /* > * If encountered, it means we are clearing bits multiple times. While > * we are handling the case, we still need to be alerted to its > * occurrence. Hence, marking it as an ERROR and not NOTICE. > */ > if (num_bits != bits_cleared) { > mlog(ML_ERROR, "Trying to clear %u bits at offset %u in group " > "descriptor # %llu (device %s), needed to clear %u bits\n", > num_bits, bit_off, > (unsigned long long)le64_to_cpu(bg->bg_blkno), > alloc_inode->i_sb->s_id, bits_cleared); > } > > If this case happens, does it mean the filesystem have already been > inconsistent? If so, why not set EROFS when this case happens? > Or anyone knows which case will casue bits to be cleared multiple times?in the past we have seen a case where the number of free bits were more than actual bits which took fs read only. I think running fsck fixed this count but didn't report any other issues. So it appeared there is a case where we were trying to free some bits twice. Since there was no real corruption we didn't take the fs read only. My guess is this problem may in code paths of releasing unused localalloc bits back to global bitmap.> Thanks very much. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [git patches] ocfs2 updates
- [RFC] metadata alloc fix in machines which has PAGE_SIZE > CLUSTER_SIZE
- [PATCH 0/3] ocfs2: Switch over to JBD2.
- [PATCH 1/5] ocfs2: Pin journal head before accessing jh->b_committed_data
- [PATCH Resend] ocfs2: free allocated clusters if error occurs after ocfs2_claim_clusters