richard -rw- weinberger
2013-Sep-02 20:32 UTC
[Ocfs2-users] OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
Hi!
Today one of my computers crashed with the following panic.
The machine is heavily using reflinks.
Looks like it managed to hit a CATCH_BH_JBD_RACES error check.
<3>[37628.934461] (reflink,512,0):ocfs2_reflink_ioctl:4459 ERROR: status =
-17
<3>[37628.943160] (kworker/u:2,809,1):ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR:
block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
<4>[37628.943169] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<2>[37628.944464] kernel BUG at
/home/rw/work/ssworkstation/maker/_source/kernel/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c:286!
<4>[37628.945134] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
<4>[37628.945809] CPU 1
<4>[37628.945817] Pid: 809, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.8.4+ #46
/
<4>[37628.947167] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8125afa0>]
[<ffffffff8125afa0>]
ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610
<4>[37628.947880] RSP: 0018:ffff880234631908 EFLAGS: 00010292
<4>[37628.948593] RAX: 000000000000006d RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
0000000000000067
<4>[37628.949317] RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI:
ffffffff8214c0dc
Oops#1 Part3
<4>[37628.950037] RBP: ffff880234631988 R08: 000000000000000a R09:
000000000000d490
<4>[37628.950758] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000004 R12:
0000000000082101
<4>[37628.951477] R13: ffff880233147980 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
ffff880216ca2208
<4>[37628.952201] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
GS:ffff88023e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>[37628.952936] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>[37628.953669] CR2: 00007fe7ea29fc62 CR3: 0000000006c0b000 CR4:
00000000000407e0
<4>[37628.954421] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:
0000000000000000
<4>[37628.955176] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:
0000000000000400
<4>[37628.955925] Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 809, threadinfo
ffff880234630000, task ffff880234ba86e0)
<4>[37628.956689] Stack:
<4>[37628.957461] 0000000000082101 ffffea0008900880 ffff880234631948
0000000000001000
<4>[37628.958250] 0000000000082102 0000000000082102 ffffffff81295eb0
0000000000000000
Oops#1 Part2
<4>[37628.959044] ffff88023428c000 0000000100000000 0000000000000000
ffff8802346319f0
<4>[37628.959844] Call Trace:
<4>[37628.960639] [<ffffffff81295eb0>] ?
ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x50/0x50
<4>[37628.961453] [<ffffffff81295e8b>]
ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x2b/0x50
<4>[37628.962249] [<ffffffff81297417>]
ocfs2_get_refcount_tree+0xa7/0x350
<4>[37628.963042] [<ffffffff8115c6d1>] ?
__find_get_block+0xa1/0x1e0
<4>[37628.963835] [<ffffffff8129c5e8>]
ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree+0x48/0x4f0
<4>[37628.964645] [<ffffffff8124fccb>]
ocfs2_remove_btree_range+0xab/0xb30
<4>[37628.965452] [<ffffffff81253a99>]
ocfs2_commit_truncate+0x139/0x550
<4>[37628.966247] [<ffffffff812844c0>] ?
ocfs2_extend_trans+0x1c0/0x1c0
<4>[37628.967049] [<ffffffff8127e36e>]
ocfs2_evict_inode+0x89e/0x2530
<4>[37628.967851] [<ffffffff81154a78>] ?
__inode_wait_for_writeback+0x68/0xc0
<4>[37628.968645] [<ffffffff8114878f>] evict+0xaf/0x1b0
<4>[37628.969432] [<ffffffff81149495>] iput+0x105/0x1a0
Oops#1 Part1
<4>[37628.970213] [<ffffffff8125b557>]
__ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes.isra.14+0x47/0x80
<4>[37628.971002] [<ffffffff8125bd65>]
ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes+0x25/0xa0
<4>[37628.971788] [<ffffffff81087dc7>] process_one_work+0x147/0x470
<4>[37628.972580] [<ffffffff810884bd>] worker_thread+0x14d/0x3f0
<4>[37628.973381] [<ffffffff81088370>] ? rescuer_thread+0x240/0x240
<4>[37628.974175] [<ffffffff8108db5b>] kthread+0xbb/0xc0
<4>[37628.974960] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80
<4>[37628.975747] [<ffffffff817dd9ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
<4>[37628.976529] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80
<4>[37628.977307] Code: 0f 0b 4c 89 ff e8 11 0b f0 ff e9 f2 fc ff ff
48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 48 85 05 2b 58 9d 00 74 09 48 85 05 c2
79 f4 00 74 02 <0f> 0b 65 48 8b 14 25 70 b8 00 00 48 8d 82 28 e0 ff ff
4d 8b 67
<1>[37628.979053] RIP [<ffffffff8125afa0>]
ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610
<4>[37628.979893] RSP <ffff880234631908>
<4>[37628.983420] ---[ end trace c03a48f44cf30d5e ]---
--
Thanks,
//richard
Jeff Liu
2013-Sep-03 03:17 UTC
[Ocfs2-users] OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
Hello, It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 several years ago: https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 The old bug ticket for the discussion: https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline? Thanks, -Jeff On 09/03/2013 04:32 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:> Hi! > > Today one of my computers crashed with the following panic. > The machine is heavily using reflinks. > Looks like it managed to hit a CATCH_BH_JBD_RACES error check. > > <3>[37628.934461] (reflink,512,0):ocfs2_reflink_ioctl:4459 ERROR: status = -17 > <3>[37628.943160] (kworker/u:2,809,1):ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: > block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer! > <4>[37628.943169] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > <2>[37628.944464] kernel BUG at > /home/rw/work/ssworkstation/maker/_source/kernel/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c:286! > <4>[37628.945134] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > <4>[37628.945809] CPU 1 > <4>[37628.945817] Pid: 809, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.8.4+ #46 > / > <4>[37628.947167] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8125afa0>] [<ffffffff8125afa0>] > ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610 > <4>[37628.947880] RSP: 0018:ffff880234631908 EFLAGS: 00010292 > <4>[37628.948593] RAX: 000000000000006d RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: > 0000000000000067 > <4>[37628.949317] RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: > ffffffff8214c0dc > Oops#1 Part3 > <4>[37628.950037] RBP: ffff880234631988 R08: 000000000000000a R09: > 000000000000d490 > <4>[37628.950758] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: > 0000000000082101 > <4>[37628.951477] R13: ffff880233147980 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: > ffff880216ca2208 > <4>[37628.952201] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) > GS:ffff88023e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > <4>[37628.952936] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > <4>[37628.953669] CR2: 00007fe7ea29fc62 CR3: 0000000006c0b000 CR4: > 00000000000407e0 > <4>[37628.954421] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: > 0000000000000000 > <4>[37628.955176] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: > 0000000000000400 > <4>[37628.955925] Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 809, threadinfo > ffff880234630000, task ffff880234ba86e0) > <4>[37628.956689] Stack: > <4>[37628.957461] 0000000000082101 ffffea0008900880 ffff880234631948 > 0000000000001000 > <4>[37628.958250] 0000000000082102 0000000000082102 ffffffff81295eb0 > 0000000000000000 > Oops#1 Part2 > <4>[37628.959044] ffff88023428c000 0000000100000000 0000000000000000 > ffff8802346319f0 > <4>[37628.959844] Call Trace: > <4>[37628.960639] [<ffffffff81295eb0>] ? ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x50/0x50 > <4>[37628.961453] [<ffffffff81295e8b>] ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x2b/0x50 > <4>[37628.962249] [<ffffffff81297417>] ocfs2_get_refcount_tree+0xa7/0x350 > <4>[37628.963042] [<ffffffff8115c6d1>] ? __find_get_block+0xa1/0x1e0 > <4>[37628.963835] [<ffffffff8129c5e8>] ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree+0x48/0x4f0 > <4>[37628.964645] [<ffffffff8124fccb>] ocfs2_remove_btree_range+0xab/0xb30 > <4>[37628.965452] [<ffffffff81253a99>] ocfs2_commit_truncate+0x139/0x550 > <4>[37628.966247] [<ffffffff812844c0>] ? ocfs2_extend_trans+0x1c0/0x1c0 > <4>[37628.967049] [<ffffffff8127e36e>] ocfs2_evict_inode+0x89e/0x2530 > <4>[37628.967851] [<ffffffff81154a78>] ? __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x68/0xc0 > <4>[37628.968645] [<ffffffff8114878f>] evict+0xaf/0x1b0 > <4>[37628.969432] [<ffffffff81149495>] iput+0x105/0x1a0 > Oops#1 Part1 > <4>[37628.970213] [<ffffffff8125b557>] __ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes.isra.14+0x47/0x80 > <4>[37628.971002] [<ffffffff8125bd65>] ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes+0x25/0xa0 > <4>[37628.971788] [<ffffffff81087dc7>] process_one_work+0x147/0x470 > <4>[37628.972580] [<ffffffff810884bd>] worker_thread+0x14d/0x3f0 > <4>[37628.973381] [<ffffffff81088370>] ? rescuer_thread+0x240/0x240 > <4>[37628.974175] [<ffffffff8108db5b>] kthread+0xbb/0xc0 > <4>[37628.974960] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80 > <4>[37628.975747] [<ffffffff817dd9ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 > <4>[37628.976529] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80 > <4>[37628.977307] Code: 0f 0b 4c 89 ff e8 11 0b f0 ff e9 f2 fc ff ff > 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 48 85 05 2b 58 9d 00 74 09 48 85 05 c2 > 79 f4 00 74 02 <0f> 0b 65 48 8b 14 25 70 b8 00 00 48 8d 82 28 e0 ff ff > 4d 8b 67 > <1>[37628.979053] RIP [<ffffffff8125afa0>] ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610 > <4>[37628.979893] RSP <ffff880234631908> > <4>[37628.983420] ---[ end trace c03a48f44cf30d5e ]--- >
Richard Weinberger
2013-Sep-03 06:42 UTC
Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
Hi! Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu:> Hello, > > It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 > several years ago: > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 > > The old bug ticket for the discussion: > https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 > > This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that > the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this > sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline?Hmm, not fun. In my case I''m not using NFS or any other network filesystem. The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline. - Are there more fixes pending? - Why aren''t you pushing things back to mainline? Thanks, //richard> Thanks, > -Jeff > On 09/03/2013 04:32 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Today one of my computers crashed with the following panic. >> The machine is heavily using reflinks. >> Looks like it managed to hit a CATCH_BH_JBD_RACES error check. >> >> <3>[37628.934461] (reflink,512,0):ocfs2_reflink_ioctl:4459 ERROR: status = -17 >> <3>[37628.943160] (kworker/u:2,809,1):ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: >> block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer! >> <4>[37628.943169] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> <2>[37628.944464] kernel BUG at >> /home/rw/work/ssworkstation/maker/_source/kernel/fs/ocfs2/buffer_head_io.c:286! >> <4>[37628.945134] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP >> <4>[37628.945809] CPU 1 >> <4>[37628.945817] Pid: 809, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.8.4+ #46 >> / >> <4>[37628.947167] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8125afa0>] [<ffffffff8125afa0>] >> ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610 >> <4>[37628.947880] RSP: 0018:ffff880234631908 EFLAGS: 00010292 >> <4>[37628.948593] RAX: 000000000000006d RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: >> 0000000000000067 >> <4>[37628.949317] RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: >> ffffffff8214c0dc >> Oops#1 Part3 >> <4>[37628.950037] RBP: ffff880234631988 R08: 000000000000000a R09: >> 000000000000d490 >> <4>[37628.950758] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: >> 0000000000082101 >> <4>[37628.951477] R13: ffff880233147980 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: >> ffff880216ca2208 >> <4>[37628.952201] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) >> GS:ffff88023e280000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 >> <4>[37628.952936] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> <4>[37628.953669] CR2: 00007fe7ea29fc62 CR3: 0000000006c0b000 CR4: >> 00000000000407e0 >> <4>[37628.954421] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: >> 0000000000000000 >> <4>[37628.955176] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: >> 0000000000000400 >> <4>[37628.955925] Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 809, threadinfo >> ffff880234630000, task ffff880234ba86e0) >> <4>[37628.956689] Stack: >> <4>[37628.957461] 0000000000082101 ffffea0008900880 ffff880234631948 >> 0000000000001000 >> <4>[37628.958250] 0000000000082102 0000000000082102 ffffffff81295eb0 >> 0000000000000000 >> Oops#1 Part2 >> <4>[37628.959044] ffff88023428c000 0000000100000000 0000000000000000 >> ffff8802346319f0 >> <4>[37628.959844] Call Trace: >> <4>[37628.960639] [<ffffffff81295eb0>] ? ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x50/0x50 >> <4>[37628.961453] [<ffffffff81295e8b>] ocfs2_read_refcount_block+0x2b/0x50 >> <4>[37628.962249] [<ffffffff81297417>] ocfs2_get_refcount_tree+0xa7/0x350 >> <4>[37628.963042] [<ffffffff8115c6d1>] ? __find_get_block+0xa1/0x1e0 >> <4>[37628.963835] [<ffffffff8129c5e8>] ocfs2_lock_refcount_tree+0x48/0x4f0 >> <4>[37628.964645] [<ffffffff8124fccb>] ocfs2_remove_btree_range+0xab/0xb30 >> <4>[37628.965452] [<ffffffff81253a99>] ocfs2_commit_truncate+0x139/0x550 >> <4>[37628.966247] [<ffffffff812844c0>] ? ocfs2_extend_trans+0x1c0/0x1c0 >> <4>[37628.967049] [<ffffffff8127e36e>] ocfs2_evict_inode+0x89e/0x2530 >> <4>[37628.967851] [<ffffffff81154a78>] ? __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x68/0xc0 >> <4>[37628.968645] [<ffffffff8114878f>] evict+0xaf/0x1b0 >> <4>[37628.969432] [<ffffffff81149495>] iput+0x105/0x1a0 >> Oops#1 Part1 >> <4>[37628.970213] [<ffffffff8125b557>] __ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes.isra.14+0x47/0x80 >> <4>[37628.971002] [<ffffffff8125bd65>] ocfs2_drop_dl_inodes+0x25/0xa0 >> <4>[37628.971788] [<ffffffff81087dc7>] process_one_work+0x147/0x470 >> <4>[37628.972580] [<ffffffff810884bd>] worker_thread+0x14d/0x3f0 >> <4>[37628.973381] [<ffffffff81088370>] ? rescuer_thread+0x240/0x240 >> <4>[37628.974175] [<ffffffff8108db5b>] kthread+0xbb/0xc0 >> <4>[37628.974960] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80 >> <4>[37628.975747] [<ffffffff817dd9ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 >> <4>[37628.976529] [<ffffffff8108daa0>] ? __kthread_parkme+0x80/0x80 >> <4>[37628.977307] Code: 0f 0b 4c 89 ff e8 11 0b f0 ff e9 f2 fc ff ff >> 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 48 85 05 2b 58 9d 00 74 09 48 85 05 c2 >> 79 f4 00 74 02 <0f> 0b 65 48 8b 14 25 70 b8 00 00 48 8d 82 28 e0 ff ff >> 4d 8b 67 >> <1>[37628.979053] RIP [<ffffffff8125afa0>] ocfs2_read_blocks+0x410/0x610 >> <4>[37628.979893] RSP <ffff880234631908> >> <4>[37628.983420] ---[ end trace c03a48f44cf30d5e ]--- >> > >
Mark Fasheh
2013-Sep-03 17:22 UTC
Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:> Hi! > > Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu: > > Hello, > > > > It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 > > several years ago: > > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 > > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 > > > > The old bug ticket for the discussion: > > https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 > > > > This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that > > the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this > > sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline? > > Hmm, not fun. > In my case I''m not using NFS or any other network filesystem. > The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). > > What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline.Can you show me what branch you are talking about here? --Mark -- Mark Fasheh
Richard Weinberger
2013-Sep-03 18:25 UTC
Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
Am 03.09.2013 19:22, schrieb Mark Fasheh:> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu: >>> Hello, >>> >>> It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4 >>> several years ago: >>> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5 >>> https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4 >>> >>> The old bug ticket for the discussion: >>> https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 >>> >>> This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that >>> the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this >>> sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline? >> >> Hmm, not fun. >> In my case I''m not using NFS or any other network filesystem. >> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). >> >> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline. > > Can you show me what branch you are talking about here?https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git seems to contain fixes for years which are not mainline. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Mark Fasheh
2013-Sep-03 19:33 UTC
Re: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:25:04PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:> >> Hmm, not fun. > >> In my case I''m not using NFS or any other network filesystem. > >> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster). > >> > >> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline. > > > > Can you show me what branch you are talking about here? > > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git seems to contain fixes for years > which are not mainline.Ok just FYI I don''t believe that to actually be the case - there might be one or two fixes that were changed when ported to mainline and there''s certainly the possiblity that a mistake was made. But generally fixes went from mainline into the 1.4 repository and not the other way. That''s not to say things haven''t been slow on the Ocfs2 front lately or anything, but I don''t believe it to be the case that fixees are regularly being put into an Oracle tree that haven''t seen mainline. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh