Guys, I'm sitting on a large number of OCFS2 patches and the review and ack rate seems to be slowing down. I'll send all of them to this list now so can we please schedule a bit of time to go through them? Several of these patches were added to the -mm tree before the 3.10 release, but I did not send them to Linus for 3.11-rc1 because their review/ack status was unclear. So can we please make a final decision regarding those? In particular: ocfs2-should-call-ocfs2_journal_access_di-before-ocfs2_delete_entry-in-ocfs2_orphan_del.patch: needs more review, Sunil might have nacked it. ocfs2-llseek-requires-ocfs2-inode-lock-for-the-file-in-seek_end.patch: Sunil was worried about performance, Joel had a question, Mark wanted an update, Joel acked it. Help! ocfs2-fix-issue-that-ocfs2_setattr-does-not-deal-with-new_i_size==i_size.patch: could do with some more acks. Jeff requested an update. ocfs2-update-inode-size-after-zeronig-the-hole.patch: needs more review. ocfs2-dlm-force-clean-refmap-when-doing-local-cleanup.patch: needs more review. Thanks.