Theodore Ts'o
2013-Apr-23 14:16 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 06/18] ocfs2: use ->invalidatepage() length argument
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:14:15AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:> ->invalidatepage() aop now accepts range to invalidate so we can make > use of it in ocfs2_invalidatepage(). > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner at redhat.com> > Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org>+Mark Fasheh, ocfs2-devel To the ocfs2 development team, Since half of this patch series modifies ext4 extensively, and changes to the other file systems are relatively small, I plan to carry the invalidatepage patch set in the ext4 tree for the next development cycle (i.e., not the upcoming merge window, but the next one). To that end, it would be great if you take a look at this patch set and send us an Acked-by signoff. Thanks!! - Ted
Joel Becker
2013-May-02 22:00 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v3 06/18] ocfs2: use ->invalidatepage() length argument
Acked-by: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:16:04AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:14:15AM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > ->invalidatepage() aop now accepts range to invalidate so we can make > > use of it in ocfs2_invalidatepage(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner at redhat.com> > > Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec at evilplan.org> > > +Mark Fasheh, ocfs2-devel > > To the ocfs2 development team, > > Since half of this patch series modifies ext4 extensively, and changes > to the other file systems are relatively small, I plan to carry the > invalidatepage patch set in the ext4 tree for the next development > cycle (i.e., not the upcoming merge window, but the next one). To > that end, it would be great if you take a look at this patch set and > send us an Acked-by signoff. > > Thanks!! > > - Ted-- "Ninety feet between bases is perhaps as close as man has ever come to perfection." - Red Smith http://www.jlbec.org/ jlbec at evilplan.org