Ocfs2 devel - Apr 2004 - Two questions

In ocfs2/src/hash.c:

HASHBUCKET:  This is a linked list which does not use the kernel's
linked list code.  Is there a reason for this?

BARF_BARF_BARF: Is there a reason for that being there?  If so maybe it
should be documented.

Thanks,
John

-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?

On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:29:48AM -0700, Villalovos, John L
wrote:
> In ocfs2/src/hash.c:
> 
> HASHBUCKET:  This is a linked list which does not use the kernel's
> linked list code.  Is there a reason for this?
Legacy. It'll actually be gone soon as the only thing using it is the
lockres hash, which will soon be merged into the inode hash.
> BARF_BARF_BARF: Is there a reason for that being there?  If so maybe it
> should be documented.
I'll let Kurt explain that one :)

We sometimes put #warnings and whatnot in the code for things we want to
revisit in the future...
	--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh
Software Developer, Oracle Corp
mark.fasheh@oracle.com