Nut upsuser - Apr 2022 - I-D progress update - ISE comments - NETVER vs PROTVER

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, Jim Klimov wrote:
> I think I committed one recently; should be possible anyhow.?
> 
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, 14:38 Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org>
wrote:
>       Jim, Is this change to PROTVER possible for 2.8.0?, or should I keep
NETVER?
Ok, I will specify PROTVER in the I-D, with a note saying

   Note: To help migration, the NUT software 2.8.0 also supports the equivalent
   NETVER command used in previous releases. See section "Technical Terms:
   Historical Differences"

Roger

Great, thanks!

Just verified - both work (and say "1.3") in current master builds.

Jim

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022, 10:31 Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, Jim Klimov wrote:
>
> > I think I committed one recently; should be possible anyhow.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022, 14:38 Roger Price <roger at
rogerprice.org> wrote:
> >       Jim, Is this change to PROTVER possible for 2.8.0?, or should I
> keep NETVER?
>
> Ok, I will specify PROTVER in the I-D, with a note saying
>
>    Note: To help migration, the NUT software 2.8.0 also supports the
> equivalent
>    NETVER command used in previous releases. See section "Technical
Terms:
>    Historical Differences"
>
> Roger
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20220420/7cde46e7/attachment.htm>