Nut upsuser - Jul 2021 - [EXTERNAL] Proposed RFC - independent reviewers wanted

>> The reviewer is someone with a general understanding of computer
systems and
>> maybe of power supplies as well, who asks:
That all seems doable.

 Are multiple reviewers needed or just 1?
There are likely more brains at Tripp Lite that could add value here and they
could either review separately or I could collaborate with them.

How soon does review need to be completed and how is review feedback provided?

 Thank you,
 David Zomaya
________________________________
 This message is for the addressee's use only. It may contain confidential
information. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and notify
the sender. Tripp Lite disclaims all warranties and liabilities, and assumes no
responsibility for viruses which may infect an email sent to you from Tripp Lite
and which damage your electronic systems or information. It is your
responsibility to maintain virus detection systems to prevent damage to your
electronic systems and information.

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, David Zomaya wrote:
>>> The reviewer is someone with a general understanding of computer
systems and
>>> maybe of power supplies as well, who asks:
>
> That all seems doable.
>
> Are multiple reviewers needed or just 1?
> There are likely more brains at Tripp Lite that could add value here and
they could either review separately or I could collaborate with them.
Hello David, The ISE editor uses the word "reviewers" in the plural.
> How soon does review need to be completed and how is review feedback
provided?
The IETF ISE (Independent Submissions Editor) describes what is needed:

: The document has been through a round of editing as I discussed several
: points with the authors, and now I'm looking for a few brief reviews.

: Are you able to have a look at it, and tell me (briefly) what you think of
: it, please?

: - Would publication be a good/bad idea?
: - Is it clear enough to be published and implemented?

: If you are also willing and have the time/energy, would you be prepared to
: do a more detailed review as well, with two parts:

: a) Comments for the Authors
:    Reasons for rejection or suggestions for improvements.
:    These will be returned to authors (or you may wish to have
:    email discussions directly with authors).  These may be
:    be published in an 'ISE write-up' if this draft
:    is sent to the IESG for a Conflict Review (RFC 5742).

: b) Comments for the Independent Submissions Editor
:    These are advice to the ISE, and will not be published.

: If you can do the review, two to three weeks would be a good time frame.

If you are interested I will forward your name to the ISE.   Roger