On Sat, 26 Jun 2021, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:> On 6/26/21 10:26 AM, Roger Price wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, Mark Hansen wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2021 5:48 AM, Roger Price wrote:
>>>> Comment: had the command LOGIN been called SETACTIVE, with the
>>>> upsmon flag ST_LOGIN changed to ST_ACTIVE, and NUMLOGINS
changed to
>>>> NUMACTIVE this mechanism would probably be easier to
understand.?
>>>> LOGOUT might be NOTACTIVE.
>>>>
>>>> ??? Current?? Proposed
>>>> ??? LOGIN???? SETACTIVE
>>>> ??? LOGOUT??? NOTACTIVE
>>>> ??? NUMLOGINS NUMACTIVE
>>>> ??? ST_LOGIN? ST_ACTIVE
>>
>>> What about:
>>> ??? Current??? Proposed
>>> ??? LOGIN????? ATTACH
>>> ??? LOGOUT???? DETACH
>>> ??? NUMLOGINS? NUMATTACHED
>>> ??? ST_LOGIN?? ST_ATTACHED
>>
>> Better.? ATTACH is simpler and clearer than SETACTIVE.? Roger
>
> +1 !
Jim, I would like to suggest this as a change to NUT - not something to be done
for the next release, but, like some other things in the draft RFC (I-D), as a
statement of direction for the project.
If the project as a whole can agree on this, I will make the change LOGIN ->
ATTACH in the I-D with a note saying that current practice is to use LOGIN. Do
we need to vote?
Roger