Nut upsuser - Jun 2021 - NUT command LOGIN is not a login

On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, Mark Hansen wrote:
> On 6/24/2021 5:48 AM, Roger Price wrote:
>> Comment: had the command LOGIN been called SETACTIVE, with the upsmon
flag
>> ST_LOGIN changed to ST_ACTIVE, and NUMLOGINS changed to NUMACTIVE this 
>> mechanism would probably be easier to understand.  LOGOUT might be
NOTACTIVE.
>>
>>     Current   Proposed
>>     LOGIN     SETACTIVE
>>     LOGOUT    NOTACTIVE
>>     NUMLOGINS NUMACTIVE
>>     ST_LOGIN  ST_ACTIVE
> What about:
>     Current    Proposed
>     LOGIN      ATTACH
>     LOGOUT     DETACH
>     NUMLOGINS  NUMATTACHED
>     ST_LOGIN   ST_ATTACHED
Better.  ATTACH is simpler and clearer than SETACTIVE.  Roger

On 6/26/21 10:26 AM, Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021, Mark Hansen wrote:
>
>> On 6/24/2021 5:48 AM, Roger Price wrote:
>>> Comment: had the command LOGIN been called SETACTIVE, with the 
>>> upsmon flag ST_LOGIN changed to ST_ACTIVE, and NUMLOGINS changed to
>>> NUMACTIVE this mechanism would probably be easier to understand.? 
>>> LOGOUT might be NOTACTIVE.
>>>
>>> ??? Current?? Proposed
>>> ??? LOGIN???? SETACTIVE
>>> ??? LOGOUT??? NOTACTIVE
>>> ??? NUMLOGINS NUMACTIVE
>>> ??? ST_LOGIN? ST_ACTIVE
>
>> What about:
>> ??? Current??? Proposed
>> ??? LOGIN????? ATTACH
>> ??? LOGOUT???? DETACH
>> ??? NUMLOGINS? NUMATTACHED
>> ??? ST_LOGIN?? ST_ATTACHED
>
> Better.? ATTACH is simpler and clearer than SETACTIVE.? Roger
+1 !