2015-04-15 15:05 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:> On Apr 15, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Charles, > > 2015-04-13 15:09 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > >> On Apr 13, 2015, at 4:28 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> cool (bis), I'll check over the day to complete as per my latest merges >> and possibly (if time permits) to publish 2.7.3. >> >> >> We should probably add a release checklist to the developer >> documentation, but for now: >> > > the maintainer guide [1] (not distributed) is more suitable. > > >> ? update version to 2.7.3 in nut/configure.ac >> > done> ? create a GPG-signed tag v2.7.3 >> > done + a non-signed one (not sure it's worth!)> ? make dist >> > done> ? maybe update nut/configure.ac version to 2.7.3.1 or .5? >> > > not sure to get why .5... > > > it's what we did last time :-) >the history log is also saying so... but still failing to understand the jump to .5 anyway, it's probably too hot here (almost jumped from winter to summer) ;)> My main reason was to create a different name for the tarball in the > Buildbot snapshot builder. After 2.7.3 is released, I plan to go back to > the previous way of injecting the Buildbot build number and Git hash into > the tarball name. (The long filenames in the Java package were preventing > us from doing this before.) >so should I really update configure.ac to 2.7.3.1 or?> ? push commits and tag >> > done> ? update nut/ and ddl/ submodules in nut-website/ (this should update the >> website's version as well) >> > WIP, however we should detail the process here:either - a generic "git submodule foreach git pull origin master" (I did that one) - Vs pulling the matching tags (here 2.7.3 from NUT for ex...), better and more stable> ? add download hashes for tarball >> > > for hashes and sig: > make dist-sig > make dist-hash > > WIP, however access to my Gandi PaaS is underway at Eaton (forgot torequest that one :-/) so a bit more delay in the release publication> > I once started to create a publication script, but... hem can't find it > back. > more to resume ;) > > >> After the new version is tagged, I'll update my Ubuntu PPA. >> > > cool! > shouldn't we add it to the Download page? > > > It's really more of a temporary solution. Now that our primary Debian > maintainer is back, all of the packages will be up-to-date, right? /me ducks >woow, cool, our beloved DD is back?! 8-) need a bit more time for that too, slowly ramping up on all (of the many) dimensions ;) cheers, Arno -- Eaton Data Center Automation - Opensource Leader NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20150416/83c8281c/attachment.html>
On Apr 16, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote:> > > 2015-04-15 15:05 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Apr 15, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Charles, >> >> 2015-04-13 15:09 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: >> On Apr 13, 2015, at 4:28 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> cool (bis), I'll check over the day to complete as per my latest merges and possibly (if time permits) to publish 2.7.3. >> >> >> We should probably add a release checklist to the developer documentation, but for now: >> >> the maintainer guide [1] (not distributed) is more suitable. >> >> ? update version to 2.7.3 in nut/configure.ac > > done >> ? create a GPG-signed tag v2.7.3 > > done + a non-signed one (not sure it's worth!)Yeah, I guess I meant that we should have a signed tag (v2.7.3) but it doesn't need "-signed" in the name. We only had to do that last time because there was already an unsigned "v2.7.2" tag.>> ? make dist > > done >> ? maybe update nut/configure.ac version to 2.7.3.1 or .5? >> >> not sure to get why .5... > > it's what we did last time :-) > > the history log is also saying so... but still failing to understand the jump to .5 > anyway, it's probably too hot here (almost jumped from winter to summer) ;) > > My main reason was to create a different name for the tarball in the Buildbot snapshot builder. After 2.7.3 is released, I plan to go back to the previous way of injecting the Buildbot build number and Git hash into the tarball name. (The long filenames in the Java package were preventing us from doing this before.) > > so should I really update configure.ac to 2.7.3.1 or?Yes, since I don't know how long it will take to reconfigure Buildbot. (I would also like to get it to automatically build the website - currently that needs to be triggered manually.)>> ? push commits and tag > > done >> ? update nut/ and ddl/ submodules in nut-website/ (this should update the website's version as well) > > WIP, however we should detail the process here: > either > - a generic "git submodule foreach git pull origin master" (I did that one) > - Vs pulling the matching tags (here 2.7.3 from NUT for ex...), better and more stableI suppose we could tag the DDL repository as well.> >> ? add download hashes for tarball >> >> for hashes and sig: >> make dist-sig >> make dist-hash > > WIP, however access to my Gandi PaaS is underway at Eaton (forgot to request that one :-/) > so a bit more delay in the release publication > >> I once started to create a publication script, but... hem can't find it back. >> more to resume ;) >> >> After the new version is tagged, I'll update my Ubuntu PPA. >> >> cool! >> shouldn't we add it to the Download page? > > It's really more of a temporary solution. Now that our primary Debian maintainer is back, all of the packages will be up-to-date, right? /me ducks > > woow, cool, our beloved DD is back?! 8-) > need a bit more time for that too, slowly ramping up on all (of the many) dimensions ;) >:-) -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20150416/94587e60/attachment.html>
2015-04-16 14:34 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:> On Apr 16, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > 2015-04-15 15:05 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > >> On Apr 15, 2015, at 5:00 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Charles, >> >> 2015-04-13 15:09 GMT+02:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: >> >>> On Apr 13, 2015, at 4:28 AM, Arnaud Quette <arnaud.quette at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> cool (bis), I'll check over the day to complete as per my latest merges >>> and possibly (if time permits) to publish 2.7.3. >>> >>> >>> We should probably add a release checklist to the developer >>> documentation, but for now: >>> >> >> the maintainer guide [1] (not distributed) is more suitable. >> >> >>> ? update version to 2.7.3 in nut/configure.ac >>> >> done > >> ? create a GPG-signed tag v2.7.3 >>> >> done + a non-signed one (not sure it's worth!) > > > Yeah, I guess I meant that we should have a signed tag (v2.7.3) but it > doesn't need "-signed" in the name. We only had to do that last time > because there was already an unsigned "v2.7.2" tag. > > ? make dist >>> >> done > >> ? maybe update nut/configure.ac version to 2.7.3.1 or .5? >>> >> >> not sure to get why .5... >> >> >> it's what we did last time :-) >> > > the history log is also saying so... but still failing to understand the > jump to .5 > anyway, it's probably too hot here (almost jumped from winter to summer) ;) > > >> My main reason was to create a different name for the tarball in the >> Buildbot snapshot builder. After 2.7.3 is released, I plan to go back to >> the previous way of injecting the Buildbot build number and Git hash into >> the tarball name. (The long filenames in the Java package were preventing >> us from doing this before.) >> > > so should I really update configure.ac to 2.7.3.1 or? > > > Yes, since I don't know how long it will take to reconfigure Buildbot. (I > would also like to get it to automatically build the website - currently > that needs to be triggered manually.) >done to 2.7.3.1> ? push commits and tag >>> >> done > >> ? update nut/ and ddl/ submodules in nut-website/ (this should update the >>> website's version as well) >>> >> WIP, however we should detail the process here: > either > > - a generic "git submodule foreach git pull origin master" (I did that one) > > - Vs pulling the matching tags (here 2.7.3 from NUT for ex...), better and more stable > > I suppose we could tag the DDL repository as well. >done, and will also do for -website I've also updated the -website submodules (ddl and nut) using the v2.7.3 tags> > >> ? add download hashes for tarball >>> >> >> for hashes and sig: >> make dist-sig >> make dist-hash >> >> WIP, however access to my Gandi PaaS is underway at Eaton (forgot to > request that one :-/) > so a bit more delay in the release publication > >> >> I once started to create a publication script, but... hem can't find it >> back. >> more to resume ;) >> >> >>> After the new version is tagged, I'll update my Ubuntu PPA. >>> >> >> cool! >> shouldn't we add it to the Download page? >> >> >> It's really more of a temporary solution. Now that our primary Debian >> maintainer is back, all of the packages will be up-to-date, right? /me ducks >> > > woow, cool, our beloved DD is back?! 8-) > need a bit more time for that too, slowly ramping up on all (of the many) > dimensions ;) > > :-) >access to my hosted PaaS still blocked... cheers, Arno -- Eaton Data Center Automation - Opensource Leader NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20150416/4d653a62/attachment-0001.html>