Because it fails for me. See Debian bug #279277 viewable at http://bugs.debian.org/279277.
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:> Because it fails for me. See Debian bug #279277 viewable at > http://bugs.debian.org/279277.This may be related to the IPv6 handling in NSD. Do you need IPv6 support? If not, try running nsd with the "-4" option. Else, use the -a option to explicitly bind the addresses you want NSD to listen to: nsd -a 192.168.0.1 -a fe80::1 Note that there is some code in nsd.c that should do the right thing based on the existance of the IPV6_V6ONLY socket option. If the above solves the problem we need to find out why this code doesn't work right. Erik
Subject: Does anyone use nsd on an UltraSparc? Date: Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:34:38AM +0100 Quoting Stephane Bortzmeyer (bortzmeyer at nic.fr):> > Because it fails for me. See Debian bug #279277 viewable at > http://bugs.debian.org/279277.I run it on Solaris on Sparc. Including v6. Is your question Linux- specific? -- M?ns Nilsson Systems Specialist +46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE He is the MELBA-BEING ... the ANGEL CAKE ... XEROX him ... XEROX him -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/attachments/20041102/e8d34fd9/attachment.bin>