Nouveau - Nov 2025 - [PATCH 06/10] rust: kernel: Update ARef and AlwaysRefCounted imports to use sync::aref

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 5:10?PM Uwe Kleine-K?nig
<u.kleine-koenig at baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> having no clue about Rust:
>
> Can this patch be applied independent of the others via the pwm tree? If
> I understand correctly it's only patch #10 that depends on the previous
> patches, right?
>
> Is there already a merge plan for this series?
Yeah, if subsystems pick the independent patches at their own pace,
then that is great, so please do!

Then, after 1 or 2 cycles, we can do the flag day change on the Rust
tree (with any last changes needed Ack'd, but ideally there will be
none remaining).

It is what did in similar cases for renaming (or moving across the
path hierarchy) things in Rust. For simple things that get Ack'd quick
enough by everyone, sometimes we may be able to take everything in the
Rust tree.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

On 11/25/25 13:31, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 5:10?PM Uwe Kleine-K?nig
> <u.kleine-koenig at baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> having no clue about Rust:
>>
>> Can this patch be applied independent of the others via the pwm tree?
If
>> I understand correctly it's only patch #10 that depends on the
previous
>> patches, right?
>>
>> Is there already a merge plan for this series?
> 
> Yeah, if subsystems pick the independent patches at their own pace,
> then that is great, so please do!
> 
> Then, after 1 or 2 cycles, we can do the flag day change on the Rust
> tree (with any last changes needed Ack'd, but ideally there will be
> none remaining).
> 
> It is what did in similar cases for renaming (or moving across the
> path hierarchy) things in Rust. For simple things that get Ack'd quick
> enough by everyone, sometimes we may be able to take everything in the
> Rust tree.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel
> 
I think code wise it's fine, provided the subject is fixed like Uwe
suggested.

Acked-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski at samsung.com>

Hello,

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 12:34:23PM +0100, Michal Wilczynski
wrote:
> On 11/25/25 13:31, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 5:10?PM Uwe Kleine-K?nig
> > <u.kleine-koenig at baylibre.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> having no clue about Rust:
> >>
> >> Can this patch be applied independent of the others via the pwm
tree? If
> >> I understand correctly it's only patch #10 that depends on the
previous
> >> patches, right?
> >>
> >> Is there already a merge plan for this series?
> > 
> > Yeah, if subsystems pick the independent patches at their own pace,
> > then that is great, so please do!
> > 
> > Then, after 1 or 2 cycles, we can do the flag day change on the Rust
> > tree (with any last changes needed Ack'd, but ideally there will
be
> > none remaining).
> > 
> > It is what did in similar cases for renaming (or moving across the
> > path hierarchy) things in Rust. For simple things that get Ack'd
quick
> > enough by everyone, sometimes we may be able to take everything in the
> > Rust tree.
> 
> I think code wise it's fine, provided the subject is fixed like Uwe
suggested.
> 
> Acked-by: Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski at samsung.com>
OK, I applied it to

	https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git
pwm/for-nexxt

. I will rebase this branch to v6.19-rc1 once that's released and then
send it to Linus for v6.20-rc1 (assuming he has so many fingers and toes
to not switch to 7.0 before :-).

If it turns out to go in via the rust tree, tell me, then I'll drop it.
In that case take my

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <ukleinek at kernel.org>

Best regards and thanks for the patch and the reviews,
Uwe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20251127/d89bfaab/attachment.sig>