Nouveau - Nov 2025 - [PATCH 7/7] nova-core: mm: Add data structures for page table management

On 11/4/25 9:56 AM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 8:29?PM John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com>
wrote:
>>
>> As Joel also was hinting at, is there any easy way to get this sort
>> of thing automatically checked? This is what scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> helps us out with on the C side, and maybe it is also the right
>> tool for Rust...?
> 
> We have a few patches for that script (including for at least one of
> the things above), but lately I have been thinking we may want to have
> a different script or tools, ideally written in Rust, to encourage
> contributions and reviews and tests and so on.
> 
> Moreover, for some of the cases above it is better to put it into
> other tooling like `rustdoc`, Clippy, `rustfmt` or even klint,
rustfmt sounds like a nice user experience: fixing things up
upon file save then becomes possible.
> depending on what it is -- over time I have opened quite a few
> suggestions and some were implemented and work great, see e.g.
> 
>     https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/349
> 
> If someone wants to help with some of that, of course, please ping me!
> 
> I also had a bot I wrote back then when we used GitHub, with quite a
> few checks (especially around development process for newcomers to the
> kernel, e.g. using the right SoB and tags etc.) which people seemed to
> appreciate (to the point of someone mentioning it in a talk... :).
> 
> A long time ago I asked about making the bot send messages to the
> mailing list when we migrated, but it wasn't OK'd back then. I can
try
I'm grateful for that. I think tooling provides a much happier
work environment: you can run the tools locally (and we can put
than in a submitters-checklist.rst), as opposed to getting an
email after posting.
> again, or perhaps it would make sense to make it send messages in
> private.
> 
> Finally, nowadays, I imagine an LLM could do a reasonable job for some
> of these as well, if there is available AI time somewhere (please see
> my reply to Joel on that too).
Very true. I saw that. Yes, once we know what the AI should be
reading for instructions, could help spot issues.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard