Alexandre Courbot
2025-Nov-01 11:46 UTC
[PATCH v2 2/3] nova-core: Simplify `DmaObject::from_data` in nova-core/dma.rs
On Fri Oct 24, 2025 at 5:51 AM JST, Daniel del Castillo wrote:> This patch solves one of the existing mentions of COHA, a task > in the Nova task list about improving the `CoherentAllocation` API. > It uses the `write` method from `CoherentAllocation`. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel del Castillo <delcastillodelarosadaniel at gmail.com> > > --- > > V1 -> V2: Split previous patch into two. One per reference to COHA. > Added more details in Safety comment. Let me know your thoughts > Kept the original map to avoid a temporary variable > --- > drivers/gpu/nova-core/dma.rs | 15 +++------------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/dma.rs b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/dma.rs > index 94f44bcfd748..620d31078858 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/nova-core/dma.rs > +++ b/drivers/gpu/nova-core/dma.rs > @@ -26,18 +26,9 @@ pub(crate) fn new(dev: &device::Device<device::Bound>, len: usize) -> Result<Sel > > pub(crate) fn from_data(dev: &device::Device<device::Bound>, data: &[u8]) -> Result<Self> { > Self::new(dev, data.len()).map(|mut dma_obj| { > - // TODO[COHA]: replace with `CoherentAllocation::write()` once available. > - // SAFETY: > - // - `dma_obj`'s size is at least `data.len()`. > - // - We have just created this object and there is no other user at this stage. > - unsafe { > - core::ptr::copy_nonoverlapping( > - data.as_ptr(), > - dma_obj.dma.start_ptr_mut(), > - data.len(), > - ); > - } > - > + // SAFETY: We have just allocated the DMA memory, we are the only users and > + // we haven't made the device aware of the handle yet. > + unsafe { dma_obj.write(data, 0)? }This doesn't build for me: error[E0277]: the `?` operator can only be used in a closure that returns `Result` or `Option` (or another type that implements `core::ops::FromResidual`) --> ../drivers/gpu/nova-core/dma.rs:31:44 | 28 | Self::new(dev, data.len()).map(|mut dma_obj| { | ------------- this function should return `Result` or `Option` to accept `?` ... 31 | unsafe { dma_obj.write(data, 0)? } | ^ cannot use the `?` operator in a closure that returns `dma::DmaObject` Could you double-check? I guess you will need to change the `map` into `and_then`.