On 6/17/25 04:41, M Henning wrote:> I've been wondering if we want to switch the default value > of?DRM_NOUVEAU_GSP_DEFAULT to y for the nouveau kernel module. My > impression is that at this point the GSP code path is both much better > tested and much faster than the classic firmware code paths on turing > and ampere. I think that encouraging distributions to use GSP by > default will go a long way to improving the default experience for users. > > Thoughts? Is there any reason not to do this?I have no objection to this.? Initially, the primary reason for keeping it disabled was to give some time to shake out any regressions - but I think we're well past that point now. Ben.
On Tue, 2025-06-17 at 14:09 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:> I have no objection to this.? Initially, the primary reason for keeping > it disabled was to give some time to shake out any regressions - but I > think we're well past that point now.In that case, why not just simply remove the Kconfig and have Nouveau use GSP if it finds it? I believe it automatically falls back to non-GSP if the firmware images are missing, anyway. If the CONFIG option is set, is there a way to force non-GSP via the Nouveau command line?