On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 2:22?PM Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc at gmail.com> wrote:> > Now that all in-tree modules have migrated to `authors`, remove:Nit: I would have said "most modules", since we have new/remaining ones (no need for a new version for this). I think this patch is OK -- we could wait to do this more cycles, but if we are doing it, then probably the sooner we do it, the simpler.> drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/nova/nova.rs | 2 +- > drivers/gpu/nova-core/nova_core.rs | 2 +- > rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 2 +- > samples/rust/rust_configfs.rs | 2 +- > samples/rust/rust_driver_auxiliary.rs | 2 +-Andreas, Danilo, Greg, Viresh: if nobody is against it, I will apply it this cycle. Acked-by's for your bits appreciated, of course. Thanks! Cheers, Miguel
On 09.06.2025 19:39, Miguel Ojeda wrote:> On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 2:22?PM Guilherme Giacomo Simoes > <trintaeoitogc at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Now that all in-tree modules have migrated to `authors`, remove: > > Nit: I would have said "most modules", since we have new/remaining > ones (no need for a new version for this). > > I think this patch is OK -- we could wait to do this more cycles, but > if we are doing it, then probably the sooner we do it, the simpler. > >> drivers/cpufreq/rcpufreq_dt.rs | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/nova/nova.rs | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/nova-core/nova_core.rs | 2 +- >> rust/kernel/firmware.rs | 2 +- >> samples/rust/rust_configfs.rs | 2 +- >> samples/rust/rust_driver_auxiliary.rs | 2 +- > > Andreas, Danilo, Greg, Viresh: if nobody is against it, I will apply > it this cycle. Acked-by's for your bits appreciated, of course.Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at kernel.org>