Danilo Krummrich
2024-Sep-30 11:20 UTC
[PATCH 2/2] nouveau/dmem: Fix memory leak in `migrate_to_ram` upon copy error
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:54:58PM +0000, Yonatan Maman wrote:> A copy push command might fail, causing `migrate_to_ram` to return a > dirty HIGH_USER page to the user. > > This exposes a security vulnerability in the nouveau driver. To prevent > memory leaks in `migrate_to_ram` upon a copy error, allocate a zero > page for the destination page.So, you refer to the case where this function fails in nouveau_dmem_copy_one()? If so, can you please explain why adding __GFP_ZERO to alloc_page_vma() helps with that?> > Signed-off-by: Yonatan Maman <Ymaman at Nvidia.com> > Signed-off-by: Gal Shalom <GalShalom at Nvidia.com>Since this is a bug, please also add a 'Fixes' tag, CC stable and add a 'Co-developed-by' tag if appropriate.> --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c > index 6fb65b01d778..097bd3af0719 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static vm_fault_t nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram(struct vm_fault *vmf) > if (!spage || !(src & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE)) > goto done; > > - dpage = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER, vmf->vma, vmf->address); > + dpage = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO, vmf->vma, vmf->address); > if (!dpage) > goto done; > > -- > 2.34.1 >
Yonatan Maman
2024-Oct-07 12:28 UTC
[PATCH 2/2] nouveau/dmem: Fix memory leak in `migrate_to_ram` upon copy error
On 30/09/2024 14:20, Danilo Krummrich wrote:> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 01:54:58PM +0000, Yonatan Maman wrote: >> A copy push command might fail, causing `migrate_to_ram` to return a >> dirty HIGH_USER page to the user. >> >> This exposes a security vulnerability in the nouveau driver. To prevent >> memory leaks in `migrate_to_ram` upon a copy error, allocate a zero >> page for the destination page. > > So, you refer to the case where this function fails in nouveau_dmem_copy_one()? > > If so, can you please explain why adding __GFP_ZERO to alloc_page_vma() helps > with that? >The nouveau_dmem_copy_one function ensures that the copy push command is sent to the device firmware but does not track whether it was executed successfully. In the case of a copy error (e.g., firmware or hardware error), the command will be sent in the firmware channel, and nouveau_dmem_copy_one might succeed, as well as the migrate_to_ram function. Thus, a dirty page could be returned to the user. It?s important to note that we attempted to use nouveau_fence_wait status to handle migration errors, but it does not catch all error types. To avoid this vulnerability, we allocate a zero page. So that, in case of an error, a non-dirty (zero) page will be returned to the user.>> >> Signed-off-by: Yonatan Maman <Ymaman at Nvidia.com> >> Signed-off-by: Gal Shalom <GalShalom at Nvidia.com> > > Since this is a bug, please also add a 'Fixes' tag, CC stable and add a > 'Co-developed-by' tag if appropriate.sure, thanks, I will add, and push it as V2 patch-series.> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c >> index 6fb65b01d778..097bd3af0719 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c >> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static vm_fault_t nouveau_dmem_migrate_to_ram(struct vm_fault *vmf) >> if (!spage || !(src & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE)) >> goto done; >> >> - dpage = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER, vmf->vma, vmf->address); >> + dpage = alloc_page_vma(GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ZERO, vmf->vma, vmf->address); >> if (!dpage) >> goto done; >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>