Nouveau - Apr 2024 - [PATCH v0 10/14] sfc: falcon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:34PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan
wrote:
> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced
"master/slave"
> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
> in the specification.
> 
> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas at
sang-engineering.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms at kernel.org>

On 4/2/2024 1:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:34PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced
"master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to
Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
>> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
>> in the specification.
>>
>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas at
sang-engineering.com/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms at kernel.org>

Thank you, Simon, for reviewing. I believe that we are settling on
controller/target
terminology from feedback on the other drivers in this series. Would you want to
re-review
v1 with that change, or should I add you R-B in v1 despite the change?

Thanks,
Easwar