Dave Airlie
2023-Jun-20 04:05 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH drm-next v5 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI
Since this is feature is nouveau only currently and doesn't disturb the current nouveau code paths, I'd like to try and get this work in tree so other drivers can work from it. If there are any major objections to this, I'm happy to pull it back out again, but I'd like to get some acks/rb in the next couple of days in order to land some of it. Dave.> > forgot to add your email address to the patch series - sorry about that. > > This series (v5) contains the Documentation changes you requested. > > - Danilo > > On 6/20/23 02:42, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > This patch series provides a new UAPI for the Nouveau driver in order to > > support Vulkan features, such as sparse bindings and sparse residency. > > > > Furthermore, with the DRM GPUVA manager it provides a new DRM core feature to > > keep track of GPU virtual address (VA) mappings in a more generic way. > > > > The DRM GPUVA manager is indented to help drivers implement userspace-manageable > > GPU VA spaces in reference to the Vulkan API. In order to achieve this goal it > > serves the following purposes in this context. > > > > 1) Provide infrastructure to track GPU VA allocations and mappings, > > making use of the maple_tree. > > > > 2) Generically connect GPU VA mappings to their backing buffers, in > > particular DRM GEM objects. > > > > 3) Provide a common implementation to perform more complex mapping > > operations on the GPU VA space. In particular splitting and merging > > of GPU VA mappings, e.g. for intersecting mapping requests or partial > > unmap requests. > > > > The new VM_BIND Nouveau UAPI build on top of the DRM GPUVA manager, itself > > providing the following new interfaces. > > > > 1) Initialize a GPU VA space via the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT ioctl > > for UMDs to specify the portion of VA space managed by the kernel and > > userspace, respectively. > > > > 2) Allocate and free a VA space region as well as bind and unbind memory > > to the GPUs VA space via the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND ioctl. > > > > 3) Execute push buffers with the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC ioctl. > > > > Both, DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND and DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC, make use of the DRM > > scheduler to queue jobs and support asynchronous processing with DRM syncobjs > > as synchronization mechanism. > > > > By default DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND does synchronous processing, > > DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC supports asynchronous processing only. > > > > The new VM_BIND UAPI for Nouveau makes also use of drm_exec (execution context > > for GEM buffers) by Christian K?nig. Since the patch implementing drm_exec was > > not yet merged into drm-next it is part of this series, as well as a small fix > > for this patch, which was found while testing this series. > > > > This patch series is also available at [1]. > > > > There is a Mesa NVK merge request by Dave Airlie [2] implementing the > > corresponding userspace parts for this series. > > > > The Vulkan CTS test suite passes the sparse binding and sparse residency test > > cases for the new UAPI together with Dave's Mesa work. > > > > There are also some test cases in the igt-gpu-tools project [3] for the new UAPI > > and hence the DRM GPU VA manager. However, most of them are testing the DRM GPU > > VA manager's logic through Nouveau's new UAPI and should be considered just as > > helper for implementation. > > > > However, I absolutely intend to change those test cases to proper kunit test > > cases for the DRM GPUVA manager, once and if we agree on it's usefulness and > > design. > > > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouvelles/kernel/-/tree/new-uapi-drm-next / > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouvelles/kernel/-/merge_requests/1 > > [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouveau/mesa/-/merge_requests/150/ > > [3] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/dakr/igt-gpu-tools/-/tree/wip_nouveau_vm_bind > > > > Changes in V2: > > =============> > Nouveau: > > - Reworked the Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI to avoid memory allocations in fence > > signalling critical sections. Updates to the VA space are split up in three > > separate stages, where only the 2. stage executes in a fence signalling > > critical section: > > > > 1. update the VA space, allocate new structures and page tables > > 2. (un-)map the requested memory bindings > > 3. free structures and page tables > > > > - Separated generic job scheduler code from specific job implementations. > > - Separated the EXEC and VM_BIND implementation of the UAPI. > > - Reworked the locking parts of the nvkm/vmm RAW interface, such that > > (un-)map operations can be executed in fence signalling critical sections. > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > - made drm_gpuva_regions optional for users of the GPUVA manager > > - allow NULL GEMs for drm_gpuva entries > > - swichted from drm_mm to maple_tree for track drm_gpuva / drm_gpuva_region > > entries > > - provide callbacks for users to allocate custom drm_gpuva_op structures to > > allow inheritance > > - added user bits to drm_gpuva_flags > > - added a prefetch operation type in order to support generating prefetch > > operations in the same way other operations generated > > - hand the responsibility for mutual exclusion for a GEM's > > drm_gpuva list to the user; simplified corresponding (un-)link functions > > > > Maple Tree: > > - I added two maple tree patches to the series, one to support custom tree > > walk macros and one to hand the locking responsibility to the user of the > > GPUVA manager without pre-defined lockdep checks. > > > > Changes in V3: > > =============> > Nouveau: > > - Reworked the Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI to do the job cleanup (including page > > table cleanup) within a workqueue rather than the job_free() callback of > > the scheduler itself. A job_free() callback can stall the execution (run() > > callback) of the next job in the queue. Since the page table cleanup > > requires to take the same locks as need to be taken for page table > > allocation, doing it directly in the job_free() callback would still > > violate the fence signalling critical path. > > - Separated Nouveau fence allocation and emit, such that we do not violate > > the fence signalling critical path in EXEC jobs. > > - Implement "regions" (for handling sparse mappings through PDEs and dual > > page tables) within Nouveau. > > - Drop the requirement for every mapping to be contained within a region. > > - Add necassary synchronization of VM_BIND job operation sequences in order > > to work around limitations in page table handling. This will be addressed > > in a future re-work of Nouveau's page table handling. > > - Fixed a couple of race conditions found through more testing. Thanks to > > Dave for consitently trying to break it. :-) > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > - Implement pre-allocation capabilities for tree modifications within fence > > signalling critical sections. > > - Implement accessors to to apply tree modification while walking the GPUVA > > tree in order to actually support processing of drm_gpuva_ops through > > callbacks in fence signalling critical sections rather than through > > pre-allocated operation lists. > > - Remove merging of GPUVAs; the kernel has limited to none knowlege about > > the semantics of mapping sequences. Hence, merging is purely speculative. > > It seems that gaining a significant (or at least a measurable) performance > > increase through merging is way more likely to happen when userspace is > > responsible for merging mappings up to the next larger page size if > > possible. > > - Since merging was removed, regions pretty much loose their right to exist. > > They might still be useful for handling dual page tables or similar > > mechanisms, but since Nouveau seems to be the only driver having a need > > for this for now, regions were removed from the GPUVA manager. > > - Fixed a couple of maple_tree related issues; thanks to Liam for helping me > > out. > > > > Changes in V4: > > =============> > Nouveau: > > - Refactored how specific VM_BIND and EXEC jobs are created and how their > > arguments are passed to the generic job implementation. > > - Fixed a UAF race condition where bind job ops could have been freed > > already while still waiting for a job cleanup to finish. This is due to > > in certain cases we need to wait for mappings actually being unmapped > > before creating sparse regions in the same area. > > - Re-based the code onto drm_exec v4 patch. > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > - Fixed a maple tree related bug when pre-allocating MA states. > > (Boris Brezillion) > > - Made struct drm_gpuva_fn_ops a const object in all occurrences. > > (Boris Brezillion) > > > > Changes in V5: > > =============> > Nouveau: > > - Link and unlink GPUVAs outside the fence signalling critical path in > > nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_submit() holding the dma-resv lock. Mutual exclusion > > of BO evicts causing mapping invalidation and regular mapping operations > > is ensured with dma-fences. > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > - Removed the separate GEMs GPUVA list lock. Link and unlink as well as > > iterating the GEM's GPUVA list should be protected with the GEM's dma-resv > > lock instead. > > - Renamed DRM_GPUVA_EVICTED flag to DRM_GPUVA_INVALIDATED. Mappings do not > > get eviced, they might get invalidated due to eviction. > > - Maple tree uses the 'unsinged long' type for node entries. While this > > works for GPU VA spaces larger than 32-bit on 64-bit kernel, the GPU VA > > space is limited to 32-bit on 32-bit kernels as well. > > As long as we do not have a 64-bit capable maple tree for 32-bit kernels, > > the GPU VA manager contains checks to throw warnings when GPU VA entries > > exceed the maple tree's storage capabilities. > > - Extended the Documentation and added example code as requested by Donald > > Robson. > > > > Christian K?nig (1): > > drm: execution context for GEM buffers v4 > > > > Danilo Krummrich (13): > > maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro > > drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings > > drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space > > drm/nouveau: new VM_BIND uapi interfaces > > drm/nouveau: get vmm via nouveau_cli_vmm() > > drm/nouveau: bo: initialize GEM GPU VA interface > > drm/nouveau: move usercopy helpers to nouveau_drv.h > > drm/nouveau: fence: separate fence alloc and emit > > drm/nouveau: fence: fail to emit when fence context is killed > > drm/nouveau: chan: provide nouveau_channel_kill() > > drm/nouveau: nvkm/vmm: implement raw ops to manage uvmm > > drm/nouveau: implement new VM_BIND uAPI > > drm/nouveau: debugfs: implement DRM GPU VA debugfs > > > > Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst | 11 + > > Documentation/gpu/drm-mm.rst | 54 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 6 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 3 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 41 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c | 278 +++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 3 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.c | 1971 ++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Kbuild | 3 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Kconfig | 2 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 9 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvif/if000c.h | 26 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvif/vmm.h | 19 +- > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/mmu.h | 20 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 24 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 204 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 22 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.h | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c | 39 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 9 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 27 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 94 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c | 418 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.h | 54 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 23 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 5 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 62 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h | 5 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c | 461 ++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h | 123 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 2 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 1979 +++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.h | 107 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vmm.c | 4 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/vmm.c | 100 +- > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/uvmm.c | 213 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.c | 197 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.h | 25 + > > .../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgf100.c | 16 +- > > .../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c | 16 +- > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmnv50.c | 27 +- > > include/drm/drm_debugfs.h | 25 + > > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 6 + > > include/drm/drm_exec.h | 119 + > > include/drm/drm_gem.h | 52 + > > include/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.h | 682 ++++++ > > include/linux/maple_tree.h | 7 +- > > include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 209 ++ > > 51 files changed, 7566 insertions(+), 242 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.h > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.h > > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_exec.h > > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.h > > > > > > base-commit: 2222dcb0775d36de28992f56455ab3967b30d380 >
Oded Gabbay
2023-Jun-20 07:06 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH drm-next v5 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 7:05?AM Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:> > Since this is feature is nouveau only currently and doesn't disturb > the current nouveau code paths, I'd like to try and get this work in > tree so other drivers can work from it. > > If there are any major objections to this, I'm happy to pull it back > out again, but I'd like to get some acks/rb in the next couple of days > in order to land some of it. > > Dave. > > > > > > forgot to add your email address to the patch series - sorry about that. > > > > This series (v5) contains the Documentation changes you requested. > > > > - Danilo > > > > On 6/20/23 02:42, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > This patch series provides a new UAPI for the Nouveau driver in order to > > > support Vulkan features, such as sparse bindings and sparse residency. > > > > > > Furthermore, with the DRM GPUVA manager it provides a new DRM core feature to > > > keep track of GPU virtual address (VA) mappings in a more generic way. > > > > > > The DRM GPUVA manager is indented to help drivers implement userspace-manageable > > > GPU VA spaces in reference to the Vulkan API. In order to achieve this goal it > > > serves the following purposes in this context. > > > > > > 1) Provide infrastructure to track GPU VA allocations and mappings, > > > making use of the maple_tree. > > > > > > 2) Generically connect GPU VA mappings to their backing buffers, in > > > particular DRM GEM objects.Will this manager be able to connect GPU VA mappings to host memory allocations (aka user pointers) ? I only skimmed over the uapi definitions, but from that quick glance I saw you can only pass a (gem) handle to the vm bind uapi. I think it is an important feature because you don't want to have two GPU VA managers running in your driver (if that's even possible). Maybe we should at least try to make sure the uapi is/will be compatible with such an extension. Oded Oded> > > > > > 3) Provide a common implementation to perform more complex mapping > > > operations on the GPU VA space. In particular splitting and merging > > > of GPU VA mappings, e.g. for intersecting mapping requests or partial > > > unmap requests. > > > > > > The new VM_BIND Nouveau UAPI build on top of the DRM GPUVA manager, itself > > > providing the following new interfaces. > > > > > > 1) Initialize a GPU VA space via the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT ioctl > > > for UMDs to specify the portion of VA space managed by the kernel and > > > userspace, respectively. > > > > > > 2) Allocate and free a VA space region as well as bind and unbind memory > > > to the GPUs VA space via the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND ioctl. > > > > > > 3) Execute push buffers with the new DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC ioctl. > > > > > > Both, DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND and DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC, make use of the DRM > > > scheduler to queue jobs and support asynchronous processing with DRM syncobjs > > > as synchronization mechanism. > > > > > > By default DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_BIND does synchronous processing, > > > DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC supports asynchronous processing only. > > > > > > The new VM_BIND UAPI for Nouveau makes also use of drm_exec (execution context > > > for GEM buffers) by Christian K?nig. Since the patch implementing drm_exec was > > > not yet merged into drm-next it is part of this series, as well as a small fix > > > for this patch, which was found while testing this series. > > > > > > This patch series is also available at [1]. > > > > > > There is a Mesa NVK merge request by Dave Airlie [2] implementing the > > > corresponding userspace parts for this series. > > > > > > The Vulkan CTS test suite passes the sparse binding and sparse residency test > > > cases for the new UAPI together with Dave's Mesa work. > > > > > > There are also some test cases in the igt-gpu-tools project [3] for the new UAPI > > > and hence the DRM GPU VA manager. However, most of them are testing the DRM GPU > > > VA manager's logic through Nouveau's new UAPI and should be considered just as > > > helper for implementation. > > > > > > However, I absolutely intend to change those test cases to proper kunit test > > > cases for the DRM GPUVA manager, once and if we agree on it's usefulness and > > > design. > > > > > > [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouvelles/kernel/-/tree/new-uapi-drm-next / > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouvelles/kernel/-/merge_requests/1 > > > [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/nouveau/mesa/-/merge_requests/150/ > > > [3] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/dakr/igt-gpu-tools/-/tree/wip_nouveau_vm_bind > > > > > > Changes in V2: > > > =============> > > Nouveau: > > > - Reworked the Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI to avoid memory allocations in fence > > > signalling critical sections. Updates to the VA space are split up in three > > > separate stages, where only the 2. stage executes in a fence signalling > > > critical section: > > > > > > 1. update the VA space, allocate new structures and page tables > > > 2. (un-)map the requested memory bindings > > > 3. free structures and page tables > > > > > > - Separated generic job scheduler code from specific job implementations. > > > - Separated the EXEC and VM_BIND implementation of the UAPI. > > > - Reworked the locking parts of the nvkm/vmm RAW interface, such that > > > (un-)map operations can be executed in fence signalling critical sections. > > > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > > - made drm_gpuva_regions optional for users of the GPUVA manager > > > - allow NULL GEMs for drm_gpuva entries > > > - swichted from drm_mm to maple_tree for track drm_gpuva / drm_gpuva_region > > > entries > > > - provide callbacks for users to allocate custom drm_gpuva_op structures to > > > allow inheritance > > > - added user bits to drm_gpuva_flags > > > - added a prefetch operation type in order to support generating prefetch > > > operations in the same way other operations generated > > > - hand the responsibility for mutual exclusion for a GEM's > > > drm_gpuva list to the user; simplified corresponding (un-)link functions > > > > > > Maple Tree: > > > - I added two maple tree patches to the series, one to support custom tree > > > walk macros and one to hand the locking responsibility to the user of the > > > GPUVA manager without pre-defined lockdep checks. > > > > > > Changes in V3: > > > =============> > > Nouveau: > > > - Reworked the Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI to do the job cleanup (including page > > > table cleanup) within a workqueue rather than the job_free() callback of > > > the scheduler itself. A job_free() callback can stall the execution (run() > > > callback) of the next job in the queue. Since the page table cleanup > > > requires to take the same locks as need to be taken for page table > > > allocation, doing it directly in the job_free() callback would still > > > violate the fence signalling critical path. > > > - Separated Nouveau fence allocation and emit, such that we do not violate > > > the fence signalling critical path in EXEC jobs. > > > - Implement "regions" (for handling sparse mappings through PDEs and dual > > > page tables) within Nouveau. > > > - Drop the requirement for every mapping to be contained within a region. > > > - Add necassary synchronization of VM_BIND job operation sequences in order > > > to work around limitations in page table handling. This will be addressed > > > in a future re-work of Nouveau's page table handling. > > > - Fixed a couple of race conditions found through more testing. Thanks to > > > Dave for consitently trying to break it. :-) > > > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > > - Implement pre-allocation capabilities for tree modifications within fence > > > signalling critical sections. > > > - Implement accessors to to apply tree modification while walking the GPUVA > > > tree in order to actually support processing of drm_gpuva_ops through > > > callbacks in fence signalling critical sections rather than through > > > pre-allocated operation lists. > > > - Remove merging of GPUVAs; the kernel has limited to none knowlege about > > > the semantics of mapping sequences. Hence, merging is purely speculative. > > > It seems that gaining a significant (or at least a measurable) performance > > > increase through merging is way more likely to happen when userspace is > > > responsible for merging mappings up to the next larger page size if > > > possible. > > > - Since merging was removed, regions pretty much loose their right to exist. > > > They might still be useful for handling dual page tables or similar > > > mechanisms, but since Nouveau seems to be the only driver having a need > > > for this for now, regions were removed from the GPUVA manager. > > > - Fixed a couple of maple_tree related issues; thanks to Liam for helping me > > > out. > > > > > > Changes in V4: > > > =============> > > Nouveau: > > > - Refactored how specific VM_BIND and EXEC jobs are created and how their > > > arguments are passed to the generic job implementation. > > > - Fixed a UAF race condition where bind job ops could have been freed > > > already while still waiting for a job cleanup to finish. This is due to > > > in certain cases we need to wait for mappings actually being unmapped > > > before creating sparse regions in the same area. > > > - Re-based the code onto drm_exec v4 patch. > > > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > > - Fixed a maple tree related bug when pre-allocating MA states. > > > (Boris Brezillion) > > > - Made struct drm_gpuva_fn_ops a const object in all occurrences. > > > (Boris Brezillion) > > > > > > Changes in V5: > > > =============> > > Nouveau: > > > - Link and unlink GPUVAs outside the fence signalling critical path in > > > nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_submit() holding the dma-resv lock. Mutual exclusion > > > of BO evicts causing mapping invalidation and regular mapping operations > > > is ensured with dma-fences. > > > > > > GPUVA Manager: > > > - Removed the separate GEMs GPUVA list lock. Link and unlink as well as > > > iterating the GEM's GPUVA list should be protected with the GEM's dma-resv > > > lock instead. > > > - Renamed DRM_GPUVA_EVICTED flag to DRM_GPUVA_INVALIDATED. Mappings do not > > > get eviced, they might get invalidated due to eviction. > > > - Maple tree uses the 'unsinged long' type for node entries. While this > > > works for GPU VA spaces larger than 32-bit on 64-bit kernel, the GPU VA > > > space is limited to 32-bit on 32-bit kernels as well. > > > As long as we do not have a 64-bit capable maple tree for 32-bit kernels, > > > the GPU VA manager contains checks to throw warnings when GPU VA entries > > > exceed the maple tree's storage capabilities. > > > - Extended the Documentation and added example code as requested by Donald > > > Robson. > > > > > > Christian K?nig (1): > > > drm: execution context for GEM buffers v4 > > > > > > Danilo Krummrich (13): > > > maple_tree: split up MA_STATE() macro > > > drm: manager to keep track of GPUs VA mappings > > > drm: debugfs: provide infrastructure to dump a DRM GPU VA space > > > drm/nouveau: new VM_BIND uapi interfaces > > > drm/nouveau: get vmm via nouveau_cli_vmm() > > > drm/nouveau: bo: initialize GEM GPU VA interface > > > drm/nouveau: move usercopy helpers to nouveau_drv.h > > > drm/nouveau: fence: separate fence alloc and emit > > > drm/nouveau: fence: fail to emit when fence context is killed > > > drm/nouveau: chan: provide nouveau_channel_kill() > > > drm/nouveau: nvkm/vmm: implement raw ops to manage uvmm > > > drm/nouveau: implement new VM_BIND uAPI > > > drm/nouveau: debugfs: implement DRM GPU VA debugfs > > > > > > Documentation/gpu/driver-uapi.rst | 11 + > > > Documentation/gpu/drm-mm.rst | 54 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig | 6 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 3 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 41 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c | 278 +++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 3 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.c | 1971 ++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Kbuild | 3 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Kconfig | 2 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/crtc.c | 9 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvif/if000c.h | 26 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvif/vmm.h | 19 +- > > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/subdev/mmu.h | 20 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 24 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.h | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 204 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 22 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.h | 1 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_debugfs.c | 39 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 9 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 27 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 94 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c | 418 ++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.h | 54 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 23 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 5 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 62 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_mem.h | 5 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_prime.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c | 461 ++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h | 123 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_svm.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 1979 +++++++++++++++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.h | 107 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vmm.c | 4 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvif/vmm.c | 100 +- > > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/uvmm.c | 213 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.c | 197 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmm.h | 25 + > > > .../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgf100.c | 16 +- > > > .../drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c | 16 +- > > > .../gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmnv50.c | 27 +- > > > include/drm/drm_debugfs.h | 25 + > > > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 6 + > > > include/drm/drm_exec.h | 119 + > > > include/drm/drm_gem.h | 52 + > > > include/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.h | 682 ++++++ > > > include/linux/maple_tree.h | 7 +- > > > include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 209 ++ > > > 51 files changed, 7566 insertions(+), 242 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.h > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.h > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c > > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.h > > > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_exec.h > > > create mode 100644 include/drm/drm_gpuva_mgr.h > > > > > > > > > base-commit: 2222dcb0775d36de28992f56455ab3967b30d380 > >
Dave Airlie
2023-Jun-20 07:13 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH drm-next v5 00/14] [RFC] DRM GPUVA Manager & Nouveau VM_BIND UAPI
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 17:06, Oded Gabbay <ogabbay at kernel.org> wrote:> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 7:05?AM Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Since this is feature is nouveau only currently and doesn't disturb > > the current nouveau code paths, I'd like to try and get this work in > > tree so other drivers can work from it. > > > > If there are any major objections to this, I'm happy to pull it back > > out again, but I'd like to get some acks/rb in the next couple of days > > in order to land some of it. > > > > Dave. > > > > > > > > > > forgot to add your email address to the patch series - sorry about that. > > > > > > This series (v5) contains the Documentation changes you requested. > > > > > > - Danilo > > > > > > On 6/20/23 02:42, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > > This patch series provides a new UAPI for the Nouveau driver in order to > > > > support Vulkan features, such as sparse bindings and sparse residency. > > > > > > > > Furthermore, with the DRM GPUVA manager it provides a new DRM core feature to > > > > keep track of GPU virtual address (VA) mappings in a more generic way. > > > > > > > > The DRM GPUVA manager is indented to help drivers implement userspace-manageable > > > > GPU VA spaces in reference to the Vulkan API. In order to achieve this goal it > > > > serves the following purposes in this context. > > > > > > > > 1) Provide infrastructure to track GPU VA allocations and mappings, > > > > making use of the maple_tree. > > > > > > > > 2) Generically connect GPU VA mappings to their backing buffers, in > > > > particular DRM GEM objects. > Will this manager be able to connect GPU VA mappings to host memory > allocations (aka user pointers) ? > > I only skimmed over the uapi definitions, but from that quick glance I > saw you can only pass a (gem) handle to the vm bind uapi. > > I think it is an important feature because you don't want to have two > GPU VA managers running in your driver (if that's even possible). > Maybe we should at least try to make sure the uapi is/will be > compatible with such an extension. >I think that would have to be a new uAPI entry point anyways, since managing user ptrs is extra, but the uAPI is nouveau specific and nouveau has no hostptr support as of now. The gpuva manager is kernel internal, I think adding host ptr tracking is useful, but I don't think it's a blocker right now. One of the reasons I'd like to get this in the tree is to add things like that instead of overloading this initial patchset with feature creep. Dave.