Lyude Paul
2021-Aug-17 20:32 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose()
It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future. Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this? On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:> Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > This patch series is: > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > > > > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you > > need > > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous > > one > > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise > > patchwork > > won't pick it up > > Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost? > > Regards, > Salvatore >-- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
Salvatore Bonaccorso
2021-Oct-11 07:05 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose()
Hi Ben, On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:> It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we > currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future. > > Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this? > > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > This patch series is: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > > > > > > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you > > > need > > > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous > > > one > > > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise > > > patchwork > > > won't pick it up > > > > Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost?Looking some older threads, noticed this one. Ben did you got a chance to look at it, or is it now irrelevant by other means? Regards, Salvatore
Karol Herbst
2021-Oct-11 11:05 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/nouveau: fix a use-after-free in postclose()
I am currently checking the ML for such old patches, just have to make sure it's actually fine and not breaking stuff as well. But I think we will pull this in soonish, I just also work on improving our CI stuff at the same time by trying out some things. On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:06 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil at debian.org> wrote:> > Hi Ben, > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:32:31PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > It may have been, we're in the process of trying to change around how we > > currently accept nouveau patches to stop this from happening in the future. > > > > Ben, whenever you get a moment can you take a look at this? > > > > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 09:03 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:00:51PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > > This patch series is: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> > > > > > > > > Btw - in the future if you need to send a respin of multiple patches, you > > > > need > > > > to send it as it's own separate series instead of replying to the previous > > > > one > > > > (one-off respins can just be posted as replies though), otherwise > > > > patchwork > > > > won't pick it up > > > > > > Did this patch series somehow fall through the cracks or got lost? > > Looking some older threads, noticed this one. Ben did you got a chance > to look at it, or is it now irrelevant by other means? > > Regards, > Salvatore >