On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> >
> > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for
> > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <sroland at
vmware.com>
> > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what
> > > happened here.
> >
> > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason.
> >
> > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of
> > a previous one.
>
> They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge
> window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they
> don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches
> show up, and then get pulled again.
>
> Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some
> confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they
> are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that).
>
> Sorry for the confusion here.
Oh, I see. Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy.
Thanks for the explanation Daniel
--
Lee Jones [???]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org ? Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog