Matti Hamalainen
2020-Nov-20 15:23 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix relocations applying logic and a double-free
Commit 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl")
included
a logic-bug which results in the relocations not actually getting
applied at all as the call to nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply() is
never reached. This causes a regression with graphical corruption,
triggered when relocations need to be done (for example after a
suspend/resume cycle.)
Fix by setting *apply_relocs value only if there were more than 0
relocations.
Additionally, the never reached code had a leftover u_free() call,
which, after fixing the logic, now got called and resulted in a
double-free. Fix by removing one u_free(), moving the other
and adding check for errors.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Matti Hamalainen <ccr at tnsp.org>
Fixes: 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl")
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/11
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index 549bc67feabb..c2051380d18c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -558,8 +558,10 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(struct nouveau_channel *chan,
NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "validating bo list\n");
validate_fini(op, chan, NULL, NULL);
return ret;
+ } else if (ret > 0) {
+ *apply_relocs = true;
}
- *apply_relocs = ret;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -662,7 +664,6 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct nouveau_cli *cli,
nouveau_bo_wr32(nvbo, r->reloc_bo_offset >> 2, data);
}
- u_free(reloc);
return ret;
}
@@ -872,9 +873,10 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void
*data,
break;
}
}
- u_free(reloc);
}
out_prevalid:
+ if (!IS_ERR(reloc))
+ u_free(reloc);
u_free(bo);
u_free(push);
base-commit: 3494d58865ad4a47611dbb427b214cc5227fa5eb
--
2.29.2
Daniel Vetter
2020-Nov-23 09:51 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix relocations applying logic and a double-free
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 4:23 PM Matti Hamalainen <ccr at tnsp.org> wrote:> > Commit 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") included > a logic-bug which results in the relocations not actually getting > applied at all as the call to nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply() is > never reached. This causes a regression with graphical corruption, > triggered when relocations need to be done (for example after a > suspend/resume cycle.) > > Fix by setting *apply_relocs value only if there were more than 0 > relocations. > > Additionally, the never reached code had a leftover u_free() call, > which, after fixing the logic, now got called and resulted in a > double-free. Fix by removing one u_free(), moving the other > and adding check for errors. > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > Signed-off-by: Matti Hamalainen <ccr at tnsp.org> > Fixes: 03e0d26fcf79 ("drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl") > Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/11Link: is for the mailing list submission of the patch itself (to link the git log to the mailing list discussions), this should be References: or similar. Aside from this: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Ben, I'm assuming you'll push this through your tree. -Daniel> --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c | 8 +++++--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > index 549bc67feabb..c2051380d18c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c > @@ -558,8 +558,10 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(struct nouveau_channel *chan, > NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "validating bo list\n"); > validate_fini(op, chan, NULL, NULL); > return ret; > + } else if (ret > 0) { > + *apply_relocs = true; > } > - *apply_relocs = ret; > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -662,7 +664,6 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct nouveau_cli *cli, > nouveau_bo_wr32(nvbo, r->reloc_bo_offset >> 2, data); > } > > - u_free(reloc); > return ret; > } > > @@ -872,9 +873,10 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > break; > } > } > - u_free(reloc); > } > out_prevalid: > + if (!IS_ERR(reloc)) > + u_free(reloc); > u_free(bo); > u_free(push); > > > base-commit: 3494d58865ad4a47611dbb427b214cc5227fa5eb > -- > 2.29.2 >-- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl
- [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl
- [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl
- [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl
- [PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: slowpath for pushbuf ioctl