Lyude Paul
2020-Feb-12 23:11 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gv100-: Re-set LUT after clearing for modesets
While certain modeset operations on gv100+ need us to temporarily
disable the LUT, we make the mistake of sometimes neglecting to
reprogram the LUT after such modesets. In particular, moving a head from
one encoder to another seems to trigger this quite often. GV100+ is very
picky about having a LUT in most scenarios, so this causes the display
engine to hang with the following error code:
disp: chid 1 stat 00005080 reason 5 [INVALID_STATE] mthd 0200 data
00000001 code 0000002d)
So, fix this by always re-programming the LUT if we're clearing it in a
state where the wndw is still visible, and has a XLUT handle programmed.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
Fixes: facaed62b4cb ("drm/nouveau/kms/gv100: initial support")
Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # v4.18+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
index 890315291b01..bb737f9281e6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/wndw.c
@@ -458,6 +458,8 @@ nv50_wndw_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane, struct
drm_plane_state *state)
asyw->clr.ntfy = armw->ntfy.handle != 0;
asyw->clr.sema = armw->sema.handle != 0;
asyw->clr.xlut = armw->xlut.handle != 0;
+ if (asyw->clr.xlut && asyw->visible)
+ asyw->set.xlut = asyw->xlut.handle != 0;
asyw->clr.csc = armw->csc.valid;
if (wndw->func->image_clr)
asyw->clr.image = armw->image.handle[0] != 0;
--
2.24.1
Sasha Levin
2020-Feb-13 17:37 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gv100-: Re-set LUT after clearing for modesets
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: facaed62b4cb ("drm/nouveau/kms/gv100: initial
support").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.3, v5.4.19, v4.19.103.
v5.5.3: Build OK!
v5.4.19: Build OK!
v4.19.103: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
88b703527ba7 ("drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: add ctm property support")
cb55cd0c66a1 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: allow more flexibility with lut
formats")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks,
Sasha
Lyude Paul
2020-Feb-13 21:19 UTC
[Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gv100-: Re-set LUT after clearing for modesets
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 17:37 +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:> Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, > fixing commit: facaed62b4cb ("drm/nouveau/kms/gv100: initial support"). > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.3, v5.4.19, v4.19.103. > > v5.5.3: Build OK! > v5.4.19: Build OK! > v4.19.103: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > 88b703527ba7 ("drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: add ctm property support") > cb55cd0c66a1 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: allow more flexibility with lut > formats") > > > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. > > How should we proceed with this patch?Apply it to 5.5.3, 5.4.19. We can drop the rest>-- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Associate Software Engineer at Red Hat
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gv100-: Re-set LUT after clearing for modesets
- [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: DP interlace fixes
- [PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: add ctm property support
- [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: add ctm property support
- [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/gf119-: allow both 256- and 1024-sized LUTs to be used