thr3ads.net - Nouveau - [Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence [Jan 2015]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Thierry Reding

2015-Jan-06 11:36 UTC

[Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:34:01PM +0800, Vince Hsu
wrote:> 
> On 01/05/2015 11:25 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >* PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> >On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:42:58AM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
> >>On 12/24/2014 09:23 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >>>Am Dienstag, den 23.12.2014, 18:39 +0800 schrieb Vince Hsu:
> >>>>This patch adds some missing pieces of the rail
gaing/ungating sequence that
> >>>>can improve the stability in theory.
> >>>>
> >>>>Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com>
> >>>>---
> >>>>  drm/nouveau_platform.c | 42
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>  drm/nouveau_platform.h |  3 +++
> >>>>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>>diff --git a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>index 68788b17a45c..527fe2358fc9 100644
> >>>>--- a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>+++ b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
> >>>>  #include <linux/module.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/reset.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >>>>  #include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
> >>>>+#include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
> >>>>  #include <soc/tegra/pmc.h>
> >>>>  #include "nouveau_drm.h"
> >>>>@@ -61,6 +63,9 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_up(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  	reset_control_deassert(gpu->rst);
> >>>>  	udelay(10);
> >>>>+	tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup, false);
> >>>>+	udelay(10);
> >>>>+
> >>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>  err_clamp:
> >>>>@@ -77,6 +82,14 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>  	int err;
> >>>>+	tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup, true);
> >>>>+	udelay(10);
> >>>>+
> >>>>+	err = tegra_powergate_gpu_set_clamping(true);
> >>>>+	if (err)
> >>>>+		return err;
> >>>>+	udelay(10);
> >>>>+
> >>>>  	reset_control_assert(gpu->rst);
> >>>>  	udelay(10);
> >>>>@@ -91,6 +104,31 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>+static int nouveau_platform_get_mc(struct device *dev,
> >>>>+		struct tegra_mc **mc, unsigned int *swgroup)
> >>>Uhm, no. If this is needed this has to be a Tegra MC function
and not
> >>>burried into nouveau code. You are using knowledge about the
internal
> >>>workings of the MC driver here.
> >>>
> >>>Also this should probably only take the Dt node pointer as
argument and
> >>>return a something like a tegra_mc_client struct that contains
both the
> >>>MC device pointer and the swgroup so you can pass that to
> >>>tegra_mc_flush().
> >>Good idea. I will have something as below in V2 if there is no
other
> >>comments for this.
> >>
> >>tegra_mc_client *tegra_mc_find_client(struct device_node *node)
> >>{
> >>     ...
> >>     ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node,
"nvidia,memory-client", ...)
> >>     ...
> >>}
> >>
> >>There were some discussion about this few weeks ago. I'm not
sure whether we
> >>have some conclusion/implementation though. Thierry?
> >>
>
>>http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/308703.html
> >I don't think client is a good fit here. Flushing is done per
SWGROUP
> >(on all clients of the SWGROUP). So I think we'll want something
like:
> >
> >	gpu at 0,57000000 {
> >		...
> >		nvidia,swgroup = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU>;
> >		...
> >	};
> >
> >In the DT and return a struct tegra_mc_swgroup along the lines of:
> >
> >	struct tegra_mc_client {
> >		unsigned int id;
> >		unsigned int swgroup;
> >
> >		struct list_head list;
> >	};
> >
> >	struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
> >		struct list_head clients;
> >		unsigned int id;
> >	};
> >
> >Where tegra_mc_swgroup.clients is a list of struct tegra_mc_client
> >structures, each representing a memory client pertaining to the
> >SWGROUP.
> Based on your suggestion above, I created a struct tegra_mc_swgroup:
> 
> struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
>     unsigned int id;
>     struct tegra_mc *mc;
>     struct list_head head;
>     struct list_head clients;
> };
> 
> And added the list head in the struct tegra_mc_soc.
> 
> struct tegra_mc_soc {
>     struct tegra_mc_client *clients;
>     unsigned int num_clients;
> 
>     struct tegra_mc_hr *hr_clients;
>     unsigned int num_hr_clients;
Why do you still need these?
>     struct list_head swgroups;
This doesn't belong in struct tegra_mc_soc because that's meant to be
static information about the specific variant of the memory-controller.
Put it in struct tegra_mc instead.
> ...
> 
> Created one function to build the swgroup list.
> 
> static int tegra_mc_build_swgroup(struct tegra_mc *mc)
> {
>     int i;
> 
>     for (i = 0; i < mc->soc->num_clients; i++) {
>         struct tegra_mc_swgroup *sg;
>         bool found = false;
> 
>         list_for_each_entry(sg, &mc->soc->swgroups, head) {
>             if (sg->id == mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup) {
>                 found = true;
>                 break;
>             }
>         }
Can't you use your new tegra_mc_find_swgroup() function here? That way
you could turn it into something slightly more readable:

	unsigned int swgroup = mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup;
	struct tegra_mc_swgroup *group;

	group = tegra_mc_find_swgroup(mc, swgroup);
	if (!group) {
		/* allocates and adds to mc->swgroups */
		group = tegra_mc_add_swgroup(mc, swgroup);
		if (!group)
			return -ENOMEM;
	}

	list_add_tail(&group->list, &mc->swgroups);

where tegra_mc_add_swgroup() is something like this:

	group = devm_kzalloc(mc->dev, sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
	if (!group)
		return NULL;

	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->clients);
	group->mc = mc;
	group->id = id;

I don't like very much how this duplicates information that is already
available in tegra_mc_soc, but I can't think of a better way to couple
the SWGROUP ID with the struct tegra_mc *, so I think we'll have to
proceed with something like the above.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20150106/aa8526ed/attachment.sig>

Vince Hsu

2015-Jan-06 12:13 UTC

head link

[Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

On 01/06/2015 07:36 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:34:01PM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
>> On 01/05/2015 11:25 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> Old Signed by an unknown key
>>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:42:58AM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
>>>> On 12/24/2014 09:23 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>>>>> Am Dienstag, den 23.12.2014, 18:39 +0800 schrieb Vince Hsu:
>>>>>> This patch adds some missing pieces of the rail
gaing/ungating sequence that
>>>>>> can improve the stability in theory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at nvidia.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>   drm/nouveau_platform.c | 42
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>   drm/nouveau_platform.h |  3 +++
>>>>>>   2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
>>>>>> index 68788b17a45c..527fe2358fc9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
>>>>>> @@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
>>>>>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/reset.h>
>>>>>>   #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>>>>>   #include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
>>>>>> +#include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
>>>>>>   #include <soc/tegra/pmc.h>
>>>>>>   #include "nouveau_drm.h"
>>>>>> @@ -61,6 +63,9 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_up(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>   	reset_control_deassert(gpu->rst);
>>>>>>   	udelay(10);
>>>>>> +	tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup, false);
>>>>>> +	udelay(10);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>   	return 0;
>>>>>>   err_clamp:
>>>>>> @@ -77,6 +82,14 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>   {
>>>>>>   	int err;
>>>>>> +	tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup, true);
>>>>>> +	udelay(10);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	err = tegra_powergate_gpu_set_clamping(true);
>>>>>> +	if (err)
>>>>>> +		return err;
>>>>>> +	udelay(10);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>   	reset_control_assert(gpu->rst);
>>>>>>   	udelay(10);
>>>>>> @@ -91,6 +104,31 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
>>>>>>   	return 0;
>>>>>>   }
>>>>>> +static int nouveau_platform_get_mc(struct device *dev,
>>>>>> +		struct tegra_mc **mc, unsigned int *swgroup)
>>>>> Uhm, no. If this is needed this has to be a Tegra MC
function and not
>>>>> burried into nouveau code. You are using knowledge about
the internal
>>>>> workings of the MC driver here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also this should probably only take the Dt node pointer as
argument and
>>>>> return a something like a tegra_mc_client struct that
contains both the
>>>>> MC device pointer and the swgroup so you can pass that to
>>>>> tegra_mc_flush().
>>>> Good idea. I will have something as below in V2 if there is no
other
>>>> comments for this.
>>>>
>>>> tegra_mc_client *tegra_mc_find_client(struct device_node *node)
>>>> {
>>>>      ...
>>>>      ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node,
"nvidia,memory-client", ...)
>>>>      ...
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> There were some discussion about this few weeks ago. I'm
not sure whether we
>>>> have some conclusion/implementation though. Thierry?
>>>>
>>>>
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/308703.html
>>> I don't think client is a good fit here. Flushing is done per
SWGROUP
>>> (on all clients of the SWGROUP). So I think we'll want
something like:
>>>
>>> 	gpu at 0,57000000 {
>>> 		...
>>> 		nvidia,swgroup = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU>;
>>> 		...
>>> 	};
>>>
>>> In the DT and return a struct tegra_mc_swgroup along the lines of:
>>>
>>> 	struct tegra_mc_client {
>>> 		unsigned int id;
>>> 		unsigned int swgroup;
>>>
>>> 		struct list_head list;
>>> 	};
>>>
>>> 	struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
>>> 		struct list_head clients;
>>> 		unsigned int id;
>>> 	};
>>>
>>> Where tegra_mc_swgroup.clients is a list of struct tegra_mc_client
>>> structures, each representing a memory client pertaining to the
>>> SWGROUP.
>> Based on your suggestion above, I created a struct tegra_mc_swgroup:
>>
>> struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
>>      unsigned int id;
>>      struct tegra_mc *mc;
>>      struct list_head head;
>>      struct list_head clients;
>> };
>>
>> And added the list head in the struct tegra_mc_soc.
>>
>> struct tegra_mc_soc {
>>      struct tegra_mc_client *clients;
>>      unsigned int num_clients;
>>
>>      struct tegra_mc_hr *hr_clients;
>>      unsigned int num_hr_clients;
> Why do you still need these?This part is added in "[PATCH 2/11] memory: tegra: add mc flush
support"
and
"[PATCH 3/11] memory: tegra: add flush operation for Tegra124 memory 
clients"
for the hotreset registers.
>
>>      struct list_head swgroups;
> This doesn't belong in struct tegra_mc_soc because that's meant to
be
> static information about the specific variant of the memory-controller.
> Put it in struct tegra_mc instead.Okay.
>
>> ...
>>
>> Created one function to build the swgroup list.
>>
>> static int tegra_mc_build_swgroup(struct tegra_mc *mc)
>> {
>>      int i;
>>
>>      for (i = 0; i < mc->soc->num_clients; i++) {
>>          struct tegra_mc_swgroup *sg;
>>          bool found = false;
>>
>>          list_for_each_entry(sg, &mc->soc->swgroups, head) {
>>              if (sg->id == mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup) {
>>                  found = true;
>>                  break;
>>              }
>>          }
> Can't you use your new tegra_mc_find_swgroup() function here? That way
> you could turn it into something slightly more readable:The tegra_mc_build_swgroup() is called during driver probe, and after that
the swgroup list is established and then the tegra_mc_find_swgroup() can 
work.
>
> 	unsigned int swgroup = mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup;
> 	struct tegra_mc_swgroup *group;
>
> 	group = tegra_mc_find_swgroup(mc, swgroup);The tegra_mc_find_swgroup() is expected to be called outside the mc 
driver and
can only take the device node as argument because other drivers do not have
the mc instance information unless they call tegra_mc_find_swgroup() or
tegra_mc_find_client().

> 	if (!group) {
> 		/* allocates and adds to mc->swgroups */
> 		group = tegra_mc_add_swgroup(mc, swgroup);
> 		if (!group)
> 			return -ENOMEM;
> 	}
>
> 	list_add_tail(&group->list, &mc->swgroups);
>
> where tegra_mc_add_swgroup() is something like this:
>
> 	group = devm_kzalloc(mc->dev, sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (!group)
> 		return NULL;
>
> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&group->clients);
> 	group->mc = mc;
> 	group->id = id;
>
> I don't like very much how this duplicates information that is already
> available in tegra_mc_soc, but I can't think of a better way to couple
> the SWGROUP ID with the struct tegra_mc *, so I think we'll have to
> proceed with something like the above.Yeah.

Thanks,
Vince

Thierry Reding

2015-Jan-06 13:55 UTC

head link

[Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:13:01PM +0800, Vince Hsu
wrote:> 
> On 01/06/2015 07:36 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >* PGP Signed by an unknown key
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:34:01PM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
> >>On 01/05/2015 11:25 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>>>Old Signed by an unknown key
> >>>On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 10:42:58AM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote:
> >>>>On 12/24/2014 09:23 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> >>>>>Am Dienstag, den 23.12.2014, 18:39 +0800 schrieb Vince
Hsu:
> >>>>>>This patch adds some missing pieces of the rail
gaing/ungating sequence that
> >>>>>>can improve the stability in theory.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Signed-off-by: Vince Hsu <vinceh at
nvidia.com>
> >>>>>>---
> >>>>>>  drm/nouveau_platform.c | 42
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>  drm/nouveau_platform.h |  3 +++
> >>>>>>  2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>diff --git a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>>>index 68788b17a45c..527fe2358fc9 100644
> >>>>>>--- a/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>>>+++ b/drm/nouveau_platform.c
> >>>>>>@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
> >>>>>>  #include <linux/module.h>
> >>>>>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>>>>>  #include <linux/of.h>
> >>>>>>+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >>>>>>  #include <linux/reset.h>
> >>>>>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >>>>>>  #include <soc/tegra/fuse.h>
> >>>>>>+#include <soc/tegra/mc.h>
> >>>>>>  #include <soc/tegra/pmc.h>
> >>>>>>  #include "nouveau_drm.h"
> >>>>>>@@ -61,6 +63,9 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_up(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>>>  	reset_control_deassert(gpu->rst);
> >>>>>>  	udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+	tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup,
false);
> >>>>>>+	udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+
> >>>>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>>>  err_clamp:
> >>>>>>@@ -77,6 +82,14 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>>>  {
> >>>>>>  	int err;
> >>>>>>+	tegra_mc_flush(gpu->mc, gpu->swgroup,
true);
> >>>>>>+	udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+
> >>>>>>+	err = tegra_powergate_gpu_set_clamping(true);
> >>>>>>+	if (err)
> >>>>>>+		return err;
> >>>>>>+	udelay(10);
> >>>>>>+
> >>>>>>  	reset_control_assert(gpu->rst);
> >>>>>>  	udelay(10);
> >>>>>>@@ -91,6 +104,31 @@ static int
nouveau_platform_power_down(struct nouveau_platform_gpu *gpu)
> >>>>>>  	return 0;
> >>>>>>  }
> >>>>>>+static int nouveau_platform_get_mc(struct device
*dev,
> >>>>>>+		struct tegra_mc **mc, unsigned int *swgroup)
> >>>>>Uhm, no. If this is needed this has to be a Tegra MC
function and not
> >>>>>burried into nouveau code. You are using knowledge
about the internal
> >>>>>workings of the MC driver here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Also this should probably only take the Dt node pointer
as argument and
> >>>>>return a something like a tegra_mc_client struct that
contains both the
> >>>>>MC device pointer and the swgroup so you can pass that
to
> >>>>>tegra_mc_flush().
> >>>>Good idea. I will have something as below in V2 if there is
no other
> >>>>comments for this.
> >>>>
> >>>>tegra_mc_client *tegra_mc_find_client(struct device_node
*node)
> >>>>{
> >>>>     ...
> >>>>     ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(node,
"nvidia,memory-client", ...)
> >>>>     ...
> >>>>}
> >>>>
> >>>>There were some discussion about this few weeks ago.
I'm not sure whether we
> >>>>have some conclusion/implementation though. Thierry?
> >>>>
>
>>>>http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-December/308703.html
> >>>I don't think client is a good fit here. Flushing is done
per SWGROUP
> >>>(on all clients of the SWGROUP). So I think we'll want
something like:
> >>>
> >>>	gpu at 0,57000000 {
> >>>		...
> >>>		nvidia,swgroup = <&mc TEGRA_SWGROUP_GPU>;
> >>>		...
> >>>	};
> >>>
> >>>In the DT and return a struct tegra_mc_swgroup along the lines
of:
> >>>
> >>>	struct tegra_mc_client {
> >>>		unsigned int id;
> >>>		unsigned int swgroup;
> >>>
> >>>		struct list_head list;
> >>>	};
> >>>
> >>>	struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
> >>>		struct list_head clients;
> >>>		unsigned int id;
> >>>	};
> >>>
> >>>Where tegra_mc_swgroup.clients is a list of struct
tegra_mc_client
> >>>structures, each representing a memory client pertaining to the
> >>>SWGROUP.
> >>Based on your suggestion above, I created a struct
tegra_mc_swgroup:
> >>
> >>struct tegra_mc_swgroup {
> >>     unsigned int id;
> >>     struct tegra_mc *mc;
> >>     struct list_head head;
> >>     struct list_head clients;
> >>};
> >>
> >>And added the list head in the struct tegra_mc_soc.
> >>
> >>struct tegra_mc_soc {
> >>     struct tegra_mc_client *clients;
> >>     unsigned int num_clients;
> >>
> >>     struct tegra_mc_hr *hr_clients;
> >>     unsigned int num_hr_clients;
> >Why do you still need these?
> This part is added in "[PATCH 2/11] memory: tegra: add mc flush
support" and
> "[PATCH 3/11] memory: tegra: add flush operation for Tegra124 memory
> clients"
> for the hotreset registers.
Right. Perhaps calling this structure tegra_mc_hotreset and the
variables *_hotresets would be a good idea to clarify that they aren't
actually per-client but per-SWGROUP.
> >>Created one function to build the swgroup list.
> >>
> >>static int tegra_mc_build_swgroup(struct tegra_mc *mc)
> >>{
> >>     int i;
> >>
> >>     for (i = 0; i < mc->soc->num_clients; i++) {
> >>         struct tegra_mc_swgroup *sg;
> >>         bool found = false;
> >>
> >>         list_for_each_entry(sg, &mc->soc->swgroups,
head) {
> >>             if (sg->id == mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup) {
> >>                 found = true;
> >>                 break;
> >>             }
> >>         }
> >Can't you use your new tegra_mc_find_swgroup() function here? That
way
> >you could turn it into something slightly more readable:
> The tegra_mc_build_swgroup() is called during driver probe, and after that
> the swgroup list is established and then the tegra_mc_find_swgroup() can
> work.
But you can reuse tegra_mc_find_swgroup() instead of open-coding it to
search the partial list. The code will be exactly the same, won't it?
> >	unsigned int swgroup = mc->soc->clients[i].swgroup;
> >	struct tegra_mc_swgroup *group;
> >
> >	group = tegra_mc_find_swgroup(mc, swgroup);
> The tegra_mc_find_swgroup() is expected to be called outside the mc driver
> and
> can only take the device node as argument because other drivers do not have
> the mc instance information unless they call tegra_mc_find_swgroup() or
> tegra_mc_find_client().
You can do that by making a low-level function that works on the struct
tegra_mc * and an unsigned int swgroup which is only used internally and
then wrap a public function around it that deals with looking up the
struct tegra_mc * and SWGROUP ID.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20150106/5ec67e55/attachment-0001.sig>

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more seemingly similar threads

Nouveau - Jan 2015 - [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

[Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

[Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

[Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 06/11] platform: complete the power up/down sequence

Possibly Parallel Threads