Maarten Maathuis
2012-Nov-25 22:50 UTC
[Nouveau] Reproducible "PGRAPH TLB flush timeout" hang on NV96
Hi everyone, I was wondering what to do to dig into this problem further.The kernel is several weeks old (nouveau tree), it's at commit 000463f13fba6b2f94a5bfcb0d615751ae9c34a0. As you can see from the mesages below the problem is reproducable to the point of getting exactly the same error. Nov 25 17:57:51 madman kernel: [548360.773743] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail: 0x019ffe03 0x00145009 0x0000102d 0x0034db43 Nov 25 19:34:09 madman kernel: [ 5623.952688] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail: 0x019ffe03 0x00145009 0x0000102d 0x0034db43 Nov 25 22:54:47 madman kernel: [ 7854.679007] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail: 0x019ffe03 0x00145009 0x0000102d 0x0034db43 Nov 25 23:04:33 madman kernel: [ 540.388597] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH TLB flush idle timeout fail: 0x019ffe03 0x00145009 0x0000102d 0x0034db43 I also updated the kernel to latest because it has the improved parsing: Nov 25 23:42:57 madman kernel: [ 169.014553] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH_STATUS : 0x019ffe03 BUSY DISPATCH VFETCH CCACHE_UNK4 STRMOUT_GSCHED_UNK5 UNK14XX UNK24XX_CSCHED UNK1CXX CLIPID ZCULL ENG2D UNK34XX TPRAST TPROP MP ROP Nov 25 23:42:57 madman kernel: [ 169.014564] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS0: 0x00145009 VFETCH CCACHE Nov 25 23:42:57 madman kernel: [ 169.014569] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS1: 0x0000102d MP Nov 25 23:42:57 madman kernel: [ 169.014573] nouveau E[ PGRAPH][0000:01:00.0] PGRAPH_VSTATUS2: 0x0034db43 ENG2D ROP Do you have any ideas to find out what is causing this? Sincerely, Maarten. -- Far away from the primal instinct, the song seems to fade away, the river get wider between your thoughts and the things we do and say.
Marcin Slusarz
2012-Nov-26 18:04 UTC
[Nouveau] Reproducible "PGRAPH TLB flush timeout" hang on NV96
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:50:50PM +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote:> Hi everyone, > > I was wondering what to do to dig into this problem further.The kernel > is several weeks old (nouveau tree), it's at commit > 000463f13fba6b2f94a5bfcb0d615751ae9c34a0. > > As you can see from the mesages below the problem is reproducable to > the point of getting exactly the same error.You missed the most important information - how do you reproduce it? :) Marcin