On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 23:16 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:> Hello,
>
> I have two quick questions if you will indulge me:
>
> 1) What proportion of functionality is covered by 100% automated tests?
Hm. Some :).
It depends on what you're interested in:
*) mesa has the piglit test suite, which covers quite a lot of GL
functionality. It tests quite a lot of things which aren't implemented,
though, so it's most useful at picking up regressions.
*) There's the rendercheck suite for X rendering. I've not used it.
*) There's modetest (in the libdrm tree) for kms testing
> 2) What danger is presented to users who run tests?
A significant probability of X crashing or the GPU locking up. I don't
think it's particularly more likely to physically damage hardware than
just using nouveau normally.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20110401/85db07d4/attachment.pgp>