mongrel unicorn - Jul 2012 - Detecting unicorn / defining after_fork after master startup

Hey everyone,

Working on an engine for rails that needs specialized behavior with
forking and I had a couple questions.

1. What is the best way to determine whether the app is indeed running
inside a unicorn server?

Most of the attempts I can find to detect check to see if the main
modules for Unicorn are defined, but this really only checks to see
that Unicorn is present, not that you are using it. I know a lot of
shops may use Unicorn in production but something else for local
development. Is there something equivalent to the IN_PHUSION_PASSENGER
constant that passenger defines?

2. Is there an established way for adding an after_fork hook after
Unicorn has already started up?

I''m aware of the ability to do this via the config file but I
don''t
want my users to have to add something to their unicorn config file.
Is there an equivalent to passenger''s
PhusionPassenger.on_event(:starting_worker_process) method?

Thanks!
-Matt

> 1. What is the best way to determine whether the app is indeed running
> inside a unicorn server?
I actually wound up just setting an environment variable for this. I
manage unicorn through an init.d, and just export UNICORN=true before
it starts up the server. We have the exact scenario you describe,
Unicorn in production and Passenger on our dev machines.
> 2. Is there an established way for adding an after_fork hook after
> Unicorn has already started up?
I just recently had to solve this problem for my team. In my case,
I''ve got multiple applications getting their unicorn configs managed
through chef, and so didn''t want to fill the chef with app-specific
switches. Since the unicorn config file is just ruby code, I just have
my config files check the app directory for a unicorn directory
containing before_fork.rb and after_fork.rb files and load the files
if they exist. It doesn''t register the hooks after Unicorn starts, but
it does let you define them outside of the config file.

Ben,

Thanks for your thoughtful comments. The engine I''m writing will be
used by users outside of our organization so unfortunately I won''t
have any control over their environment or config files - I''m looking
to get as close to zero-config as I can through app server detection.

Thanks,
-Matt

Matt Sanders <matt at modal.org> wrote:
> 1. What is the best way to determine whether the app is indeed running
> inside a unicorn server?
Unicorn.listener_names will return a non-empty array of listener
addresses.
> 2. Is there an established way for adding an after_fork hook after
> Unicorn has already started up?
Nothing that I know of.
> I''m aware of the ability to do this via the config file but I
don''t
> want my users to have to add something to their unicorn config file.
> Is there an equivalent to passenger''s
> PhusionPassenger.on_event(:starting_worker_process) method?
Lately, I''ve been favoring the following pattern instead:

  def initialize
    @init_pid = $$
    ...
  end

  def initialize_child_fork
    @init_pid = $$
    ...
  end

  def call(env)
    initialize_child_fork if @init_pid != $$
    ...
  end

The overhead is negligible and works regardless of server (even in
non-HTTP servers somebody may write).  I really don''t like code
that would need to special case for all sorts of servers:

  foo_for_passenger if defined?(PhusionPassenger)
  foo_for_unicorn if defined?(Unicorn)
  foo_for_something_fastcgi if defined?(SomethingFastCGI)
  foo_for_something_scgi if defined?(SomethingSCGI)
  foo_for_something_else_that_forks if defined?(YetAnotherForkingRackServer)
  foo_for_something_else if defined?(SomethingElse)
  ...

Eric,

Thanks! I definitely agree in general with that pattern. In this case
I''d ideally like some activity on the forked child before the next
request cycle - that is, if the forked child doesn''t serve any
requests for a little bit, I''d still like my behavior to be
initialized.

Do you know of a way to get this behavior without a direct after fork hook?

Thanks for your help!
-Matt

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net>
wrote:
> Matt Sanders <matt at modal.org> wrote:
>> 1. What is the best way to determine whether the app is indeed running
>> inside a unicorn server?
>
> Unicorn.listener_names will return a non-empty array of listener
> addresses.
>
>> 2. Is there an established way for adding an after_fork hook after
>> Unicorn has already started up?
>
> Nothing that I know of.
>
>> I''m aware of the ability to do this via the config file but I
don''t
>> want my users to have to add something to their unicorn config file.
>> Is there an equivalent to passenger''s
>> PhusionPassenger.on_event(:starting_worker_process) method?
>
> Lately, I''ve been favoring the following pattern instead:
>
>   def initialize
>     @init_pid = $$
>     ...
>   end
>
>   def initialize_child_fork
>     @init_pid = $$
>     ...
>   end
>
>   def call(env)
>     initialize_child_fork if @init_pid != $$
>     ...
>   end
>
> The overhead is negligible and works regardless of server (even in
> non-HTTP servers somebody may write).  I really don''t like code
> that would need to special case for all sorts of servers:
>
>   foo_for_passenger if defined?(PhusionPassenger)
>   foo_for_unicorn if defined?(Unicorn)
>   foo_for_something_fastcgi if defined?(SomethingFastCGI)
>   foo_for_something_scgi if defined?(SomethingSCGI)
>   foo_for_something_else_that_forks if
defined?(YetAnotherForkingRackServer)
>   foo_for_something_else if defined?(SomethingElse)
>   ...
> _______________________________________________
> Unicorn mailing list - mongrel-unicorn at rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn
> Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying

Matt Sanders <matt at modal.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson at yhbt.net>
wrote:
> > Matt Sanders <matt at modal.org> wrote:
> >> 2. Is there an established way for adding an after_fork hook after
> >> Unicorn has already started up?
> >
> > Nothing that I know of.
> >
> >> I''m aware of the ability to do this via the config file
but I don''t
> >> want my users to have to add something to their unicorn config
file.
> >> Is there an equivalent to passenger''s
> >> PhusionPassenger.on_event(:starting_worker_process) method?
> >
> > Lately, I''ve been favoring the following pattern instead:
(top-posting corrected)
> Thanks! I definitely agree in general with that pattern. In this case
> I''d ideally like some activity on the forked child before the next
> request cycle - that is, if the forked child doesn''t serve any
> requests for a little bit, I''d still like my behavior to be
> initialized.
Yes, that sucks.  I''ll often just throw some requests at the child
just to start something up if I need it, or initiate a separate daemon.
> Do you know of a way to get this behavior without a direct after fork hook?
No, unfortunately not.  I have considered petitioning for something
along the lines of pthread_atfork() in Ruby, but pthread_atfork() itself
also has unfortunate drawbacks (it makes fork() async-signal un-safe,
and thus _Fork() will be introduced in the next version of POSIX).