On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:16:17AM -0800, barsalou wrote:> I knew that hpricot was a dependency, but hoe and rubyforge....is this right?Yes. Hoe is required for running the tests. -- Aaron Patterson http://tenderlovemaking.com/
I knew that hpricot was a dependency, but hoe and rubyforge....is this right? Version 0.6.9 for ruby Mike B. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Quoting Aaron Patterson <aaron at tenderlovemaking.com>:> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:16:17AM -0800, barsalou wrote: >> I knew that hpricot was a dependency, but hoe and rubyforge....is >> this right? > > Yes. Hoe is required for running the tests. > > -- > Aaron Patterson > http://tenderlovemaking.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Mechanize-users mailing list > Mechanize-users at rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mechanize-users >I see. Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On Jul 23, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Aaron Patterson wrote:> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:16:17AM -0800, barsalou wrote: >> I knew that hpricot was a dependency, but hoe and rubyforge....is >> this right? > > Yes. Hoe is required for running the tests.As an FYI, you might be able to avoid this by wrapping your require ''hoe'' in a begin/rescue and providing a simple test task in the rescue block. That way you''d need hoe to do any of the packaging tasks, but tests can still run without it. -Mat