Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? There are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was already looking at them. Thanks Andrew -- Andrew Turner mobile: 248.982.3609 andrew at fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
Andrew, I was hoping we''d hear from Derek. He was handling all the pull requests as far as I can see, but he''s been scarce the last 6 months or so. I''ve been hoping he''s just on a rocking project and will come roaring back when it''s done. I appreciated his efforts! -dylan- On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Turner <ajturner at highearthorbit.com>wrote:> Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) > > I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? There > are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. > I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few > of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was > already looking at them. > > Thanks > Andrew > > > -- > Andrew Turner > mobile: 248.982.3609 > andrew at fortiusone.com > http://highearthorbit.com > > http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120117/b2977b18/attachment.htm>
Indeed, I have been somewhat MIA and I apologise. Have had a very busy time in work the last few months not to mention also getting married so that hasn''t left me with a lot of time to do much else! Unfortunately it happened to coincide with a flurry of activity on the project so I haven''t been able to keep up with all the changes :( I last merged a few requests in mid November and earmarked a few more that were either quick and easy to get in or important additions or bug fixes. Think there have been about five or six new pull request since that I haven''t looked at yet. Andrew - the items I picked out and had been assigned to me I''ve now marked with a "Next release" milestone instead and will now only assign them to me if I''m working on them so feel free to pick up whatever you want I should be able to get back into the swing of closing pull requests and maybe even doing some more of the actual coding again shortly. Derek On 17 January 2012 23:01, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote:> Andrew, > > I was hoping we''d hear from Derek. He was handling all the pull requests > as far as I can see, but he''s been scarce the last 6 months or so. I''ve > been hoping he''s just on a rocking project and will come roaring back when > it''s done. I appreciated his efforts! > > -dylan- > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Turner < > ajturner at highearthorbit.com> wrote: > >> Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) >> >> I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? There >> are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. >> I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few >> of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was >> already looking at them. >> >> Thanks >> Andrew >> >> >> -- >> Andrew Turner >> mobile: 248.982.3609 >> andrew at fortiusone.com >> http://highearthorbit.com >> >> http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web >> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >-- Derek Fowler m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 e. dezfowler at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120117/e18e98b5/attachment.htm>
Hi everone first up, great to see the renewed enthusiasm in mapstraction. We should do our best to capitalize on it and push the project forward. One thing I''m unclear on is who even has the right to merge pull requests and do launches. My vote is we need to expand that group. It''s perfectly reasonable that individuals are busy, have other events in their lives, etc and thus aren''t always going to have the spare cycles for mapstraction One technique I''ve seen work well in the perl world is that each month there is a launch king, he is in charge of doing a new launch on or near the 15th of the month. the benefit of this is - developers know when their submits will get live - launch kings will know when they are going to be launch king and can schedule it for months when they will have capactiy - it happens frequently - 12 times a year, so developers know when they submit, their work will actually get live. This has encouraged much more participation. - users see the project is active, thus are more likely to commit their attention to it - because it is monthly, the number of new submissions is rarely massive, each individual launch king doesn''t do that much work. I would advocate such an approach, I am happy to be a launch king at some point. I''m happy to help also in the merging of the existing backlog of pull requests, I''m just a bit unclear as to how to do so. Any guidance is welcome. Finally, Andrew, one separate issue. I ''m a bit confused on how to edit the mapstraction homepage Is it https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com or is it https://github.com/mapstraction/homepage I recently made some minor edits to https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com in the hopes that that is the correct homepage. If yes, can you push it live or tell me how to do so? many thanks. 2012/1/17 Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com>:> Indeed, I have been somewhat MIA and I apologise. > > Have had a very busy time in work the last few months not to mention also > getting married so that hasn''t left me with a lot of time to do much > else!?Unfortunately it happened to coincide with a flurry of activity on the > project so I haven''t been able to keep up with all the changes :( > > I last merged a few requests in mid November and earmarked a few more that > were either quick and easy to get in or important additions or bug fixes. > Think there have been about five or six new pull request since that I > haven''t looked at yet. > > Andrew - the items I picked out and had been assigned to me I''ve now marked > with a "Next release" milestone instead and will now only assign them to me > if I''m working on them so?feel free to pick up whatever you want > > I should be able to get back into the swing of closing pull requests and > maybe even doing some more of the actual coding again shortly. > > Derek > > On 17 January 2012 23:01, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Andrew, >> >> I was hoping we''d hear from Derek. He was handling all the pull requests >> as far as I can see, but he''s been scarce the last 6 months or so. I''ve been >> hoping he''s just on a rocking project and will come roaring back when it''s >> done. I appreciated his efforts! >> >> -dylan- >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Turner >> <ajturner at highearthorbit.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) >>> >>> I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? ?There >>> are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. >>> I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few >>> of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was >>> already looking at them. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Andrew >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Andrew Turner >>> mobile: 248.982.3609 >>> andrew at fortiusone.com >>> http://highearthorbit.com >>> >>> http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web >>> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapstraction mailing list >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > > > > -- > Derek Fowler > m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 > e. dezfowler at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu> wrote:> Hi everone > > first up, great to see the renewed enthusiasm in mapstraction. We > should do our best to capitalize on it and push the project forward.Indeed. I''m excited!> > One thing I''m unclear on is who even has the right to merge pull > requests and do launches. My vote is we need to expand that group. > It''s perfectly reasonable that individuals are busy, have other events > in their lives, etc and thus aren''t always going to have the spare > cycles for mapstraction > > > One technique I''ve seen work well in the perl world is that each month > there is a launch king, he is in charge of doing a new launch on or > near the 15th of the month. > > the benefit of this is > - developers know when their submits will get live > - launch kings will know when they are going to be launch king and can > schedule it for months when they will have capactiy > - it happens frequently - 12 times a year, so developers know when > they submit, their work will actually get live. This has encouraged > much more participation. > - users see the project is active, thus are more likely to commit > their attention to it > - because it is monthly, the number of new submissions is rarely > massive, each individual launch king doesn''t do that much work. > > I would advocate such an approach, I am happy to be a launch king at > some point. I''m happy to help also in the merging of the existing > backlog of pull requests, I''m just a bit unclear as to how to do so. > Any guidance is welcome.This sounds like a good idea, although I could imagine we''d also have Launch Queens. We can setup Milestones (https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/issues/milestones). I went ahead and created a "February 15, 2012" one just to start. Ed, since you''ve done it before, do you want to ''head up'' this first one to set the technique and tone for how to do them well? :)> > Finally, Andrew, one separate issue. I ''m a bit confused on how to > edit the mapstraction homepage > > Is it > https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com > > or is it > https://github.com/mapstraction/homepage >It is now neither. I have renamed the /mapstraction.com project to mapstraction.github.com as well as added the CNAME and made the DNS entry that is now, officially, the homepage. Mapstraction.com will be hosted by this project''s github pages. I made some additional modifications as well as added in the Google Analytics tracking code (not sure it was working on the php page, very old version and says we had 2 visitors in the last year or so :) The API docs come from the mxn gh-pages branch (https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/tree/gh-pages). So when we do a "Release" we should do a build and deploy of the gh-pages branch. Andrew> > I recently made some minor edits to > https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com in the hopes that > that is the correct homepage. If yes, can you push it live or tell me > how to do so? > > many thanks. > > 2012/1/17 Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com>: >> Indeed, I have been somewhat MIA and I apologise. >> >> Have had a very busy time in work the last few months not to mention also >> getting married so that hasn''t left me with a lot of time to do much >> else!?Unfortunately it happened to coincide with a flurry of activity on the >> project so I haven''t been able to keep up with all the changes :( >> >> I last merged a few requests in mid November and earmarked a few more that >> were either quick and easy to get in or important additions or bug fixes. >> Think there have been about five or six new pull request since that I >> haven''t looked at yet. >> >> Andrew - the items I picked out and had been assigned to me I''ve now marked >> with a "Next release" milestone instead and will now only assign them to me >> if I''m working on them so?feel free to pick up whatever you want >> >> I should be able to get back into the swing of closing pull requests and >> maybe even doing some more of the actual coding again shortly. >> >> Derek >> >> On 17 January 2012 23:01, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Andrew, >>> >>> I was hoping we''d hear from Derek. He was handling all the pull requests >>> as far as I can see, but he''s been scarce the last 6 months or so. I''ve been >>> hoping he''s just on a rocking project and will come roaring back when it''s >>> done. I appreciated his efforts! >>> >>> -dylan- >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Turner >>> <ajturner at highearthorbit.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) >>>> >>>> I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? ?There >>>> are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. >>>> I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few >>>> of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was >>>> already looking at them. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Andrew Turner >>>> mobile: 248.982.3609 >>>> andrew at fortiusone.com >>>> http://highearthorbit.com >>>> >>>> http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web >>>> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapstraction mailing list >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Derek Fowler >> m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 >> e. dezfowler at gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com-- Andrew Turner mobile: 248.982.3609 andrew at fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
Hi Andrew (and others), some comments inline below 2012/1/24 Andrew Turner <andrew at highearthorbit.com>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu> wrote: > > > > One technique I''ve seen work well in the perl world is that each month > > there is a launch king, he is in charge of doing a new launch on or > > near the 15th of the month. > > > > the benefit of this is > > - developers know when their submits will get live > > - launch kings will know when they are going to be launch king and can > > schedule it for months when they will have capactiy > > - it happens frequently - 12 times a year, so developers know when > > they submit, their work will actually get live. This has encouraged > > much more participation. > > - users see the project is active, thus are more likely to commit > > their attention to it > > - because it is monthly, the number of new submissions is rarely > > massive, each individual launch king doesn''t do that much work. > > > > I would advocate such an approach, I am happy to be a launch king at > > some point. I''m happy to help also in the merging of the existing > > backlog of pull requests, I''m just a bit unclear as to how to do so. > > Any guidance is welcome. > > This sounds like a good idea, although I could imagine we''d also have > Launch Queens. >yes of course> We can setup Milestones > (https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/issues/milestones). I went ahead > and created a "February 15, 2012" one just to start. Ed, since you''ve > done it before, do you want to ''head up'' this first one to set the > technique and tone for how to do them well? :) > >unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy to do Feb 15th assuming a. someone else volunteers for March 15th b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or explain to me how I merge pull requests c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions> > > > Finally, Andrew, one separate issue. I ''m a bit confused on how to > > edit the mapstraction homepage > > >unfortunately I''m still confused. We''ve now changed how the homepage is done several times. Whatever the new way is, please let''s delete the old stuff. It''s very confusing and unclear what the source of truth is. Who can delete https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com and https://github.com/mapstraction/homepage so that we don''t continue mistakenly editing them?> > Is it > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com > > > > or is it > > https://github.com/mapstraction/homepage > > > > It is now neither. > > I have renamed the /mapstraction.com project to > mapstraction.github.com as well as added the CNAME and made the DNS > entry that is now, officially, the homepage. Mapstraction.com will be > hosted by this project''s github pages. I made some additional > modifications as well as added in the Google Analytics tracking code > (not sure it was working on the php page, very old version and says we > had 2 visitors in the last year or so :) > > The API docs come from the mxn gh-pages branch > (https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/tree/gh-pages). So when we do a > "Release" we should do a build and deploy of the gh-pages branch. >ok, this is an example of something you''ll have to show me how to do as I have no idea what you actually mean in practice. I''m sure it can''t be complicated I just don''t get what actually needs to happen who is up for volunteering for the 15th of March? great to see the momentum building.> > Andrew > > > > > I recently made some minor edits to > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com in the hopes that > > that is the correct homepage. If yes, can you push it live or tell me > > how to do so? > > > > many thanks. > > > > 2012/1/17 Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com>: > >> Indeed, I have been somewhat MIA and I apologise. > >> > >> Have had a very busy time in work the last few months not to mention > also > >> getting married so that hasn''t left me with a lot of time to do much > >> else! Unfortunately it happened to coincide with a flurry of activity > on the > >> project so I haven''t been able to keep up with all the changes :( > >> > >> I last merged a few requests in mid November and earmarked a few more > that > >> were either quick and easy to get in or important additions or bug > fixes. > >> Think there have been about five or six new pull request since that I > >> haven''t looked at yet. > >> > >> Andrew - the items I picked out and had been assigned to me I''ve now > marked > >> with a "Next release" milestone instead and will now only assign them > to me > >> if I''m working on them so feel free to pick up whatever you want > >> > >> I should be able to get back into the swing of closing pull requests and > >> maybe even doing some more of the actual coding again shortly. > >> > >> Derek > >> > >> On 17 January 2012 23:01, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Andrew, > >>> > >>> I was hoping we''d hear from Derek. He was handling all the pull > requests > >>> as far as I can see, but he''s been scarce the last 6 months or so. > I''ve been > >>> hoping he''s just on a rocking project and will come roaring back when > it''s > >>> done. I appreciated his efforts! > >>> > >>> -dylan- > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Turner > >>> <ajturner at highearthorbit.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? There > >>>> are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. > >>>> I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few > >>>> of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was > >>>> already looking at them. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Andrew > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Andrew Turner > >>>> mobile: 248.982.3609 > >>>> andrew at fortiusone.com > >>>> http://highearthorbit.com > >>>> > >>>> http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > >>>> Introduction to Neogeography - > http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Mapstraction mailing list > >>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >>>> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Mapstraction mailing list > >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >>> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Derek Fowler > >> m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 > >> e. dezfowler at gmail.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mapstraction mailing list > >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Mapstraction mailing list > > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > mobile: 248.982.3609 > andrew at fortiusone.com > http://highearthorbit.com > > http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120124/6e23c664/attachment-0001.htm>
I''ve been "gitting" furiously over recent months, complete with merging, branching, pull requests and releasing ... happy to help out as much or as little as is needed. Also been doing GitHub pages for one of my projects (on GitHub naturally) so can also help out there. G -- gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com On 24 Jan 2012, at 11:43, Ed Freyfogle wrote:> Hi Andrew (and others), > > some comments inline below > > 2012/1/24 Andrew Turner <andrew at highearthorbit.com> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu> wrote: > > > > One technique I''ve seen work well in the perl world is that each month > > there is a launch king, he is in charge of doing a new launch on or > > near the 15th of the month. > > > > the benefit of this is > > - developers know when their submits will get live > > - launch kings will know when they are going to be launch king and can > > schedule it for months when they will have capactiy > > - it happens frequently - 12 times a year, so developers know when > > they submit, their work will actually get live. This has encouraged > > much more participation. > > - users see the project is active, thus are more likely to commit > > their attention to it > > - because it is monthly, the number of new submissions is rarely > > massive, each individual launch king doesn''t do that much work. > > > > I would advocate such an approach, I am happy to be a launch king at > > some point. I''m happy to help also in the merging of the existing > > backlog of pull requests, I''m just a bit unclear as to how to do so. > > Any guidance is welcome. > > This sounds like a good idea, although I could imagine we''d also have > Launch Queens. > > yes of course > > > We can setup Milestones > (https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/issues/milestones). I went ahead > and created a "February 15, 2012" one just to start. Ed, since you''ve > done it before, do you want to ''head up'' this first one to set the > technique and tone for how to do them well? :) > > > unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy to do Feb 15th assuming > > a. someone else volunteers for March 15th > b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or explain to me how I merge pull requests > c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions > > > > > > Finally, Andrew, one separate issue. I ''m a bit confused on how to > > edit the mapstraction homepage > > > > unfortunately I''m still confused. We''ve now changed how the homepage is done several times. > Whatever the new way is, please let''s delete the old stuff. It''s very confusing and unclear what the source of truth is. > > Who can delete https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com and https://github.com/mapstraction/homepage so that we don''t continue mistakenly editing them? > > > > Is it > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com > > > > or is it > > https://github.com/mapstraction/homepage > > > > It is now neither. > > I have renamed the /mapstraction.com project to > mapstraction.github.com as well as added the CNAME and made the DNS > entry that is now, officially, the homepage. Mapstraction.com will be > hosted by this project''s github pages. I made some additional > modifications as well as added in the Google Analytics tracking code > (not sure it was working on the php page, very old version and says we > had 2 visitors in the last year or so :) > > The API docs come from the mxn gh-pages branch > (https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/tree/gh-pages). So when we do a > "Release" we should do a build and deploy of the gh-pages branch. > > ok, this is an example of something you''ll have to show me how to do as I have no idea what you actually mean in practice. I''m sure it can''t be complicated I just don''t get what actually needs to happen > > who is up for volunteering for the 15th of March? > > great to see the momentum building. > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > I recently made some minor edits to > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mapstraction.com in the hopes that > > that is the correct homepage. If yes, can you push it live or tell me > > how to do so? > > > > many thanks. > > > > 2012/1/17 Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com>: > >> Indeed, I have been somewhat MIA and I apologise. > >> > >> Have had a very busy time in work the last few months not to mention also > >> getting married so that hasn''t left me with a lot of time to do much > >> else! Unfortunately it happened to coincide with a flurry of activity on the > >> project so I haven''t been able to keep up with all the changes :( > >> > >> I last merged a few requests in mid November and earmarked a few more that > >> were either quick and easy to get in or important additions or bug fixes. > >> Think there have been about five or six new pull request since that I > >> haven''t looked at yet. > >> > >> Andrew - the items I picked out and had been assigned to me I''ve now marked > >> with a "Next release" milestone instead and will now only assign them to me > >> if I''m working on them so feel free to pick up whatever you want > >> > >> I should be able to get back into the swing of closing pull requests and > >> maybe even doing some more of the actual coding again shortly. > >> > >> Derek > >> > >> On 17 January 2012 23:01, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Andrew, > >>> > >>> I was hoping we''d hear from Derek. He was handling all the pull requests > >>> as far as I can see, but he''s been scarce the last 6 months or so. I''ve been > >>> hoping he''s just on a rocking project and will come roaring back when it''s > >>> done. I appreciated his efforts! > >>> > >>> -dylan- > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andrew Turner > >>> <ajturner at highearthorbit.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hey Everyone - exciting times for mapstraction, eh? :) > >>>> > >>>> I wanted to peek in on how we''re handling the Pull Requests? There > >>>> are currently 20 out there and it would be great to pull into master. > >>>> I''m going to be using Mapstraction for a project and can check a few > >>>> of these but didn''t want to duplicate effort if anyone else was > >>>> already looking at them. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Andrew > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Andrew Turner > >>>> mobile: 248.982.3609 > >>>> andrew at fortiusone.com > >>>> http://highearthorbit.com > >>>> > >>>> http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > >>>> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Mapstraction mailing list > >>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Mapstraction mailing list > >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Derek Fowler > >> m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 > >> e. dezfowler at gmail.com > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mapstraction mailing list > >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Mapstraction mailing list > > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > mobile: 248.982.3609 > andrew at fortiusone.com > http://highearthorbit.com > > http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120124/78ebde0d/attachment.htm>
> > unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. > that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy > to do Feb 15th assuming > a. someone else volunteers for March 15th > b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or > explain to me how I merge pull requests > c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only > very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questionsWe''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but I''ll go in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance we can still get a release out this month? -dylan- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120216/96d4c99b/attachment.htm>
Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master MXN repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else who joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound ideal at all. See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context ... G -- gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote:> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy to do Feb 15th assuming > a. someone else volunteers for March 15th > b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or explain to me how I merge pull requests > c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions > > We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but I''ll go in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance we can still get a release out this month? > > -dylan- > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120216/693955be/attachment.htm>
I remain happy to try as long as someone else volunteers to go next. We have so many great new things (for example leaflet) and bug fixes ready to go, we just need to get them merged in 2012/2/16 Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com>:>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. >> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy >> to do Feb 15th assuming >> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or >> explain to me how I merge pull requests >> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only >> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions > > > We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but I''ll go > in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance we can > still get a release out this month? > > -dylan- > > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >
agree. who owns the master? Dylan? 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>:> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master MXN > repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an > organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else who > joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other > alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound ideal > at all. > > See?https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context ... > > G > > -- > gary at?vicchi.org?|?twitter.com/vicchi?| > www.linkedin.com/in/garygale?|?www.garygale.com > > On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: > >> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. >> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy >> to do Feb 15th assuming >> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or >> explain to me how I merge pull requests >> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only >> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions > > > We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but I''ll go > in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance we can > still get a release out this month? > > -dylan- > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >
Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN probably doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own personal account. So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. I think. G -- gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote:> agree. who owns the master? Dylan? > > 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: >> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master MXN >> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an >> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else who >> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other >> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound ideal >> at all. >> >> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context ... >> >> G >> >> -- >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | >> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com >> >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: >> >>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. >>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy >>> to do Feb 15th assuming >>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or >>> explain to me how I merge pull requests >>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only >>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions >> >> >> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but I''ll go >> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance we can >> still get a release out this month? >> >> -dylan- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
We''re looking to Andrew, I think. I''m just another forker :) -dylan- On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org> wrote:> Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an > existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN > probably doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own > personal account. > > So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or > Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal > account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that > account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account > into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, > myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. > > I think. > > G > > -- > gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | > www.garygale.com > > On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote: > > > agree. who owns the master? Dylan? > > > > 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: > >> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master > MXN > >> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an > >> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else who > >> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other > >> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound > ideal > >> at all. > >> > >> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context > ... > >> > >> G > >> > >> -- > >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | > >> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com > >> > >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: > >> > >>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. > >>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m > happy > >>> to do Feb 15th assuming > >>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th > >>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do > this or > >>> explain to me how I merge pull requests > >>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git > only > >>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions > >> > >> > >> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but > I''ll go > >> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance > we can > >> still get a release out this month? > >> > >> -dylan- > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mapstraction mailing list > >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mapstraction mailing list > >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Mapstraction mailing list > > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120216/199a4990/attachment.htm>
"just another forker" ... ? You just made my day with that comment! -- gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:57, Dylan Kuhn wrote:> We''re looking to Andrew, I think. I''m just another forker :) > > -dylan- > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org> wrote: > Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN probably doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own personal account. > > So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. > > I think. > > G > > -- > gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com > > On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote: > > > agree. who owns the master? Dylan? > > > > 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: > >> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master MXN > >> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an > >> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else who > >> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other > >> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound ideal > >> at all. > >> > >> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context ... > >> > >> G > >> > >> -- > >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | > >> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com > >> > >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: > >> > >>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at git. > >>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m happy > >>> to do Feb 15th assuming > >>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th > >>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do this or > >>> explain to me how I merge pull requests > >>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git only > >>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions > >> > >> > >> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but I''ll go > >> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance we can > >> still get a release out this month? > >> > >> -dylan- > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mapstraction mailing list > >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mapstraction mailing list > >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Mapstraction mailing list > > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120216/88ecb66f/attachment-0001.htm>
It''s Andrew, yes, I don''t have that level of access. Regarding merges and releases etc I''ll schedule one for Monday if that''s okay with everyone. As part of that I''ll get some documentation together about the process I''ve been following in the wiki as all you budding volunteers aren''t going to get very far without that and it would be good to get some input on it anyway. Can I get a consensus on the outstanding pull requests people would most like to see go into this release? Thanks, Derek On 16 February 2012 17:57, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote:> We''re looking to Andrew, I think. I''m just another forker :) > > -dylan- > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org> wrote: > >> Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an >> existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN >> probably doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own >> personal account. >> >> So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or >> Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal >> account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that >> account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account >> into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, >> myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. >> >> I think. >> >> G >> >> -- >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | >> www.garygale.com >> >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote: >> >> > agree. who owns the master? Dylan? >> > >> > 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: >> >> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master >> MXN >> >> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an >> >> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else >> who >> >> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other >> >> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound >> ideal >> >> at all. >> >> >> >> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context >> ... >> >> >> >> G >> >> >> >> -- >> >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | >> >> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com >> >> >> >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: >> >> >> >>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at >> git. >> >>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m >> happy >> >>> to do Feb 15th assuming >> >>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >> >>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do >> this or >> >>> explain to me how I merge pull requests >> >>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git >> only >> >>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions >> >> >> >> >> >> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but >> I''ll go >> >> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance >> we can >> >> still get a release out this month? >> >> >> >> -dylan- >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mapstraction mailing list >> >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> >> >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Mapstraction mailing list >> >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> >> >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mapstraction mailing list >> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> > >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >-- Derek Fowler m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 e. dezfowler at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120217/8c6691f1/attachment.htm>
missed this chain of emails. I''ll do the org conversion! On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com> wrote:> It''s Andrew, yes, I don''t have that level of access. > > Regarding merges and releases etc I''ll schedule one for Monday if that''s > okay with everyone. As part of that I''ll get some documentation together > about the process I''ve been following in the wiki as all you budding > volunteers aren''t going to get very far without that and it would be good to > get some input on it anyway. > > Can I get a consensus on the outstanding pull requests people would most > like to see go into this release? > > Thanks, > Derek > > > On 16 February 2012 17:57, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We''re looking to Andrew, I think. I''m just another forker :) >> >> -dylan- >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org> wrote: >>> >>> Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an >>> existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN probably >>> doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own personal >>> account. >>> >>> So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or >>> Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal >>> account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that >>> account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account >>> into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, >>> myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. >>> >>> I think. >>> >>> G >>> >>> -- >>> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | >>> www.garygale.com >>> >>> On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote: >>> >>> > agree. who owns the master? Dylan? >>> > >>> > 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: >>> >> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master >>> >> MXN >>> >> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an >>> >> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else >>> >> who >>> >> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other >>> >> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound >>> >> ideal >>> >> at all. >>> >> >>> >> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context >>> >> ... >>> >> >>> >> G >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | >>> >> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com >>> >> >>> >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at >>> >>> git. >>> >>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m >>> >>> happy >>> >>> to do Feb 15th assuming >>> >>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >>> >>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do >>> >>> this or >>> >>> explain to me how I merge pull requests >>> >>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git >>> >>> only >>> >>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but >>> >> I''ll go >>> >> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance >>> >> we can >>> >> still get a release out this month? >>> >> >>> >> -dylan- >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Mapstraction mailing list >>> >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> >> >>> >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Mapstraction mailing list >>> >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> >> >>> >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mapstraction mailing list >>> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> > >>> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapstraction mailing list >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > > > > -- > Derek Fowler > m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 > e. dezfowler at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >-- Andrew Turner mobile: 248.982.3609 andrew at fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
and done (LOVE github) https://github.com/organizations/mapstraction On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Turner <andrew at highearthorbit.com> wrote:> missed this chain of emails. I''ll do the org conversion! > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com> wrote: >> It''s Andrew, yes, I don''t have that level of access. >> >> Regarding merges and releases etc I''ll schedule one for Monday if that''s >> okay with everyone. As part of that I''ll get some documentation together >> about the process I''ve been following in the wiki as all you budding >> volunteers aren''t going to get very far without that and it would be good to >> get some input on it anyway. >> >> Can I get a consensus on the outstanding pull requests people would most >> like to see go into this release? >> >> Thanks, >> Derek >> >> >> On 16 February 2012 17:57, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> We''re looking to Andrew, I think. I''m just another forker :) >>> >>> -dylan- >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an >>>> existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN probably >>>> doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own personal >>>> account. >>>> >>>> So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or >>>> Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal >>>> account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that >>>> account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account >>>> into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, >>>> myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. >>>> >>>> I think. >>>> >>>> G >>>> >>>> -- >>>> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | >>>> www.garygale.com >>>> >>>> On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote: >>>> >>>> > agree. who owns the master? Dylan? >>>> > >>>> > 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: >>>> >> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master >>>> >> MXN >>>> >> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an >>>> >> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else >>>> >> who >>>> >> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other >>>> >> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound >>>> >> ideal >>>> >> at all. >>>> >> >>>> >> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context >>>> >> ... >>>> >> >>>> >> G >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | >>>> >> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com >>>> >> >>>> >> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at >>>> >>> git. >>>> >>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m >>>> >>> happy >>>> >>> to do Feb 15th assuming >>>> >>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >>>> >>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do >>>> >>> this or >>>> >>> explain to me how I merge pull requests >>>> >>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git >>>> >>> only >>>> >>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but >>>> >> I''ll go >>>> >> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance >>>> >> we can >>>> >> still get a release out this month? >>>> >> >>>> >> -dylan- >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> Mapstraction mailing list >>>> >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>> >> >>>> >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>> >> Mapstraction mailing list >>>> >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>> >> >>>> >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>> >> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Mapstraction mailing list >>>> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>> > >>>> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapstraction mailing list >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Derek Fowler >> m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 >> e. dezfowler at gmail.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > mobile: 248.982.3609 > andrew at fortiusone.com > http://highearthorbit.com > > http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography-- Andrew Turner mobile: 248.982.3609 andrew at fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
... and GitHub now tells me I''m an owner of the organisation and I can switch contexts. So tomorrow, I''ll take a look at what''s outstanding in terms of pull requests. In the meantime, who else has owner rights? We should probably allocate pull requests to each owner so we don''t conflict with each other. Nice work Andrew! G -- gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com On 20 Feb 2012, at 16:36, Andrew Turner wrote:> and done (LOVE github) > > https://github.com/organizations/mapstraction > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Andrew Turner > <andrew at highearthorbit.com> wrote: >> missed this chain of emails. I''ll do the org conversion! >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com> wrote: >>> It''s Andrew, yes, I don''t have that level of access. >>> >>> Regarding merges and releases etc I''ll schedule one for Monday if that''s >>> okay with everyone. As part of that I''ll get some documentation together >>> about the process I''ve been following in the wiki as all you budding >>> volunteers aren''t going to get very far without that and it would be good to >>> get some input on it anyway. >>> >>> Can I get a consensus on the outstanding pull requests people would most >>> like to see go into this release? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Derek >>> >>> >>> On 16 February 2012 17:57, Dylan Kuhn <dylan.k.kuhn at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> We''re looking to Andrew, I think. I''m just another forker :) >>>> >>>> -dylan- >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Reading into this a bit further it looks like you have to convert an >>>>> existing GitHub account into an organisation ... the "owner" of MXN probably >>>>> doesn''t want to do this as they''ll effectively loose their own personal >>>>> account. >>>>> >>>>> So what I think needs to happen is someone (the owner ... Dylan or >>>>> Andrew?) creates a new "master" MXN account, separate from their personal >>>>> account, transfers ownership of MXN to that new account, then converts that >>>>> account into an organisation and finally (re)adds their personal account >>>>> into the organisation as an admin. Once that''s done other people (Ed, >>>>> myself?) can be added in with admin rights as well. >>>>> >>>>> I think. >>>>> >>>>> G >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | >>>>> www.garygale.com >>>>> >>>>> On 16 Feb 2012, at 17:20, Ed Freyfogle wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> agree. who owns the master? Dylan? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2012/2/16 Gary Gale <gary at vicchi.org>: >>>>>>> Sounds like the best way to do this is to get whoever owns the master >>>>>>> MXN >>>>>>> repository on GitHub (Andrew?) to convert the repository into an >>>>>>> organisation and then assign himself, Ed and myself (and anyone else >>>>>>> who >>>>>>> joins in the fun) into admins. From what I can see, the only other >>>>>>> alternative is to start sharing account details, which doesn''t sound >>>>>>> ideal >>>>>>> at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See https://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations for context >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> G >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> gary at vicchi.org | twitter.com/vicchi | >>>>>>> www.linkedin.com/in/garygale | www.garygale.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 16 Feb 2012, at 16:41, Dylan Kuhn wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> unfortunately I haven''t done it before. I''m also a total rookie at >>>>>>>> git. >>>>>>>> that being said though this could be the chance to learn, so yes I''m >>>>>>>> happy >>>>>>>> to do Feb 15th assuming >>>>>>>> a. someone else volunteers for March 15th >>>>>>>> b. someone can give me access to the account needed to actually do >>>>>>>> this or >>>>>>>> explain to me how I merge pull requests >>>>>>>> c. people have patience with the fact that I know my way around git >>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>> very superficially and will thus probbaly ask many rookie questions >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We''ve let Feb 15 go by. I''m sorry I didn''t raise my hand sooner, but >>>>>>> I''ll go >>>>>>> in with Gary and Ed as willing to help with pull requests. Any chance >>>>>>> we can >>>>>>> still get a release out this month? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -dylan- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>>>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>>>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>>>> >>>>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mapstraction mailing list >>>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Derek Fowler >>> m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 >>> e. dezfowler at gmail.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mapstraction mailing list >>> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >>> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Andrew Turner >> mobile: 248.982.3609 >> andrew at fortiusone.com >> http://highearthorbit.com >> >> http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web >> Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > > > > -- > Andrew Turner > mobile: 248.982.3609 > andrew at fortiusone.com > http://highearthorbit.com > > http://geocommons.com Helping build the Geospatial Web > Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
Hi all, There''s still one of my pull req pending here : https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/pull/99 That one just fixes some missing implementations for openlayers. I still have old things not merged for now : https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/ac73f8451873272be4119b3ceebca3c879625020#commitcomment-1002155 I also have an old branch for the refactoring of addJSON() : https://github.com/brunob/mxn/tree/mxn_addjson We have already been discussing about this one, what do you think we can do or what''s needed ? About merges, i''ve seen that freyfogle had done a lot of merges, thanks for him ;) But i''m not sure these are done "the good way" cause all the commits are authored by him and not their authors. Have you followed the github documentation to do it ? If you want to add me to the Mxn organisation on github i will be glad to help as i can. ++ b_b
Hi Bruno great to see you pushing to get your improvements live. my comments below 2012/2/23 Bruno Bergot <brunobergot at gmail.com>:> Hi all, > > There''s still one of my pull req pending here : > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/pull/99 > > That one just fixes some missing implementations for openlayers. >unfortunately github tells me "This pull request cannot be automatically merged." because of some sort of conflict, happy to merge it as soon as the conflict is resolved. Can you reintegrate it with master and eliminate the conflict? Basically my policy was to move things forward by merging all pull requests that a. github allowed me to merge with a single click (ie there were no conflicts) AND b. effected only specific providers and made no changes to mxn.core.js or mxn.js to do the merge I didn''t follow any specific docs, github presents a "click here to merge" button, which I then clicked. Rest assured I''m not trying to take credit for your hard work - or your bugs ;-) Github does list me as doing the merge, but it also shows who the commit came from like "Merge pull request #98 from brunob/openlayers_geocoder [freyfogle] " All that being said I''ll be the first to admit I am very far from being a github expert. Please do point me to docs showing a better way. I am hopeful we can get to a faster release cycle while of course also maintaining good quality standards. We (Gary, Dylan, Andrew and I) have been emailing about exactly that. Dylan is preparing some quality guidelines. Happy to have you be a core committer, unfortunately I don''t think I have the ability to give you access, I believe only Andrew does.> I still have old things not merged for now : > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/ac73f8451873272be4119b3ceebca3c879625020#commitcomment-1002155 > > I also have an old branch for the refactoring of addJSON() : > > https://github.com/brunob/mxn/tree/mxn_addjson > > We have already been discussing about this one, what do you think we can do > or what''s needed ? > > About merges, i''ve seen that freyfogle had done a lot of merges, thanks for > him ;) But i''m not sure these are done "the good way" cause all the commits > are authored by him and not their authors. Have you followed the github > documentation to do it ? > > If you want to add me to the Mxn organisation on github i will be glad to > help as i can. > > ++ > b_b > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
Hi Ed, Le 23/02/2012 16:20, Ed Freyfogle a ?crit :> > 2012/2/23 Bruno Bergot<brunobergot at gmail.com>: >> Hi all, >> >> There''s still one of my pull req pending here : >> >> https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/pull/99 >> >> That one just fixes some missing implementations for openlayers. >> > > unfortunately github tells me "This pull request cannot be > automatically merged." because of some sort of conflict, happy to > merge it as soon as the conflict is resolved. > Can you reintegrate it with master and eliminate the conflict?Ok i see the problem, i''ve also proposed a implementation of bubbles methods on my pull req : https://github.com/brunob/mxn/commit/33fa68e80e0fd55241d0d515023a611dd3410129 This one is on conflict with this merge : https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/c7275a6149e5f069473e78a713e9a01182c9d1aa I don''t mind if we use OpenLayers.Popup or OpenLayers.Popup.FramedCloud but the cyberhobo patch seems to lack of internal events firing. I''m trying to merge my hotfixes branch but it seems to be totally screwed (a lot of changes have been made since the pull req was open). I have to delete it for now. Here are some patches of the two commits that where in my pull req.> > Rest assured I''m not trying to take credit for your hard work - or > your bugs ;-)No problem with that :) ++ b_b -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-done-mousePosition-implemantation-for-openlayers.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1135 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120223/ae554386/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0003-done-scale-control-for-addControls-with-openlayers-f.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 1112 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120223/ae554386/attachment-0001.bin>
Hi again, Ok i''ve restored my hotfixes branch, but ican''t send my fixes for nom cause it seems that we had some mistakes in this merge : https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/00d3283838bed835f006a3c143238f71c4700443#commitcomment-1003422 ++ b_b
Hi Bruno, everyone Good news: I rolled back the bad version of mxn.openlayers.core.js - apologies for letting that slip through and thanks for making me aware quickly. More good news: I then applied your patches. they are available on master. Hopefully you can make the final patch now that master is good again and we can close your pull request. let''s keep the momentum going. Ed 2012/2/23 Bruno Bergot <brunobergot at gmail.com>:> Hi again, > > Ok i''ve restored my hotfixes branch, but ican''t send my fixes for nom cause > it seems that we had some mistakes in this merge : > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/00d3283838bed835f006a3c143238f71c4700443#commitcomment-1003422 > > > ++ > b_b > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
Just pushed a couple of commits to master to fix the broken build and a ton of bugs that came in with the merging last week. Please update your forks and, if you had your pull request merged in last week, you may find some of your stuff stops working. I had to remove/amend quite a few bits that were trying to use unsupported methods and looked like they were the result of some files being missed out during a commit. Derek On 23 February 2012 22:32, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu> wrote:> Hi Bruno, everyone > > Good news: I rolled back the bad version of mxn.openlayers.core.js - > apologies for letting that slip through and thanks for making me aware > quickly. > > More good news: I then applied your patches. they are available on master. > > Hopefully you can make the final patch now that master is good again > and we can close your pull request. > > let''s keep the momentum going. > > Ed > > > > > > > > > 2012/2/23 Bruno Bergot <brunobergot at gmail.com>: > > Hi again, > > > > Ok i''ve restored my hotfixes branch, but ican''t send my fixes for nom > cause > > it seems that we had some mistakes in this merge : > > > > > https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/00d3283838bed835f006a3c143238f71c4700443#commitcomment-1003422 > > > > > > ++ > > b_b > > _______________________________________________ > > Mapstraction mailing list > > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >-- Derek Fowler m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 e. dezfowler at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20120226/4244ff1f/attachment.htm>
Thanks Derek! By the way, whenever anyone is developing you can easily test locally using the simple tests/core.html file. I pushed the most recent master that includes Derek''s fixes here so you can see latest master: http://mapstraction.com/mxn/tests/core.html Andrew On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Derek Fowler <dezfowler at gmail.com> wrote:> Just pushed a couple of commits to master to fix the broken build and a ton > of bugs that came in with the merging last week. > > Please update your forks and, if you had your pull request merged in last > week, you may find some of your stuff stops working. > > I had to remove/amend quite a few bits that were trying to use unsupported > methods and looked like they were the result of some files being missed out > during a commit. > > Derek > > > On 23 February 2012 22:32, Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu> wrote: >> >> Hi Bruno, everyone >> >> Good news: ?I rolled back the bad version of mxn.openlayers.core.js - >> apologies for letting that slip through and thanks for making me aware >> quickly. >> >> More good news: I then applied your patches. they are available on master. >> >> Hopefully you can make the final patch now that master is good again >> and we can close your pull request. >> >> let''s keep the momentum going. >> >> Ed >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2012/2/23 Bruno Bergot <brunobergot at gmail.com>: >> > Hi again, >> > >> > Ok i''ve restored my hotfixes branch, but ican''t send my fixes for nom >> > cause >> > it seems that we had some mistakes in this merge : >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/mapstraction/mxn/commit/00d3283838bed835f006a3c143238f71c4700443#commitcomment-1003422 >> > >> > >> > ++ >> > b_b >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mapstraction mailing list >> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Mapstraction mailing list >> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > > > > > -- > Derek Fowler > m. +44 (0) 7966 512 369 > e. dezfowler at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com >-- Andrew Turner mobile: 248.982.3609 andrew at fortiusone.com http://highearthorbit.com http://geocommons.com? ? ? ? ?? Helping build the Geospatial Web Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography