Google just announced that Google Maps V3 is the way forward. I know many on this list have already been using it. I''m not sure whether we should change anything on our side. I think it would be confusing to switch ''googlev3'' to ''google'' and it would likely break people''s code, too. Now''s a great time to suggest someone implement Mapstraction. If they are rewriting code anyway, might as well make it the last time they have to do it. I said as much in my Programmable Web post, as well: http://blog.programmableweb.com/2010/05/19/google-maps-api-v3-goes-into-production/ --Ad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100519/f20bfc71/attachment.htm>
great idea 2010/5/19 Adam DuVander <mapstraction at duvander.com>:> Google just announced that Google Maps V3 is the way forward. I know many on > this list have already been using it. I''m not sure whether we should change > anything on our side. I think it would be confusing to switch ''googlev3'' to > ''google'' and it would likely break people''s code, too. > Now''s a great time to suggest someone implement Mapstraction. If they are > rewriting code anyway, might as well make it the last time they have to do > it. I said as much in my Programmable Web post, as well: > http://blog.programmableweb.com/2010/05/19/google-maps-api-v3-goes-into-production/ > --Ad > _______________________________________________ > Mapstraction mailing list > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com > http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com > >
That shows that Mapstraction is a good and useful idea!!
--
Saludos,
Pablo L?pez Escob?s
2010/5/19 Ed Freyfogle <edf at sloan.mit.edu>
> great idea
>
>
> 2010/5/19 Adam DuVander <mapstraction at duvander.com>:
> > Google just announced that Google Maps V3 is the way forward. I know
many
> on
> > this list have already been using it. I''m not sure whether we
should
> change
> > anything on our side. I think it would be confusing to switch
''googlev3''
> to
> > ''google'' and it would likely break people''s
code, too.
> > Now''s a great time to suggest someone implement Mapstraction.
If they are
> > rewriting code anyway, might as well make it the last time they have
to
> do
> > it. I said as much in my Programmable Web post, as well:
> >
>
http://blog.programmableweb.com/2010/05/19/google-maps-api-v3-goes-into-production/
> > --Ad
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mapstraction mailing list
> > Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> >
http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Mapstraction mailing list
> Mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com
> http://lists.mapstraction.com/listinfo.cgi/mapstraction-mapstraction.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.mapstraction.com/pipermail/mapstraction-mapstraction.com/attachments/20100519/0998066a/attachment.htm>
may someone likes to update the sandbox? all samples are v2! (and anybe someone likes to update the providers section in the sandbox to the current supported list, too) regards Henrik>reply to message: >date: 19.05.2010 19:37:19 >from: "Adam DuVander" <mapstraction at duvander.com> >to: mapstraction at lists.mapstraction.com >subject: [Mapstraction] Google V2 now deprecated > >Google just announced that Google Maps V3 is the way forward. I know many on >this list have already been using it. I''m not sure whether we should change >anything on our side. I think it would be confusing to switch ''googlev3'' to >''google'' and it would likely break people''s code, too. > >Now''s a great time to suggest someone implement Mapstraction. If they are >rewriting code anyway, might as well make it the last time they have to do >it. I said as much in my Programmable Web post, as well: >http://blog.programmableweb.com/2010/05/19/google-maps-api-v3-goes-into-production/ > >--Ad >