Hello,
I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on the
block
device. I entered the following command *"mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre
--mdt
--mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS"* but got the following error at the output.
I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64.
*Output:*
Permanent disk data:
Target: lustre-MDTffff
Index: unassigned
Lustre FS: lustre
Mount type: ldiskfs
Flags: 0x75
(MDT MGS needs_index first_time update )
Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro
Parameters:
checking for existing Lustre data: not found
device size = 4096MB
formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS
target name lustre-MDTffff
4k blocks 1048576
options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O
dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F
mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512
-q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576
Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg
mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256)
mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256
Thank you.
Sze Chuan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20101122/1cf6cacf/attachment.html
is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? looks not. On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote:> Hello, > > I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on the block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the following error at the output. > > I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. > > Output: > > Permanent disk data: > Target: lustre-MDTffff > Index: unassigned > Lustre FS: lustre > Mount type: ldiskfs > Flags: 0x75 > (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) > Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro > Parameters: > > checking for existing Lustre data: not found > device size = 4096MB > formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS > target name lustre-MDTffff > 4k blocks 1048576 > options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F > mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 > Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg > > mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) > > mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 > > Thank you. > > Sze Chuan > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20101122/73787dc7/attachment.html
I couldn''t install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. Any
idea
to go about doing it?
Here''s my output:
rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm
Preparing... ###########################################
[100%]
file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of
e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov <
alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com> wrote:
> is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site?
> looks not.
>
> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on
the
> block device. I entered the following command *"mkfs.lustre
> --fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS"* but got the
following
> error at the output.
>
> I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64.
>
> *Output:*
>
> Permanent disk data:
> Target: lustre-MDTffff
> Index: unassigned
> Lustre FS: lustre
> Mount type: ldiskfs
> Flags: 0x75
> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update )
> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro
> Parameters:
>
> checking for existing Lustre data: not found
> device size = 4096MB
> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS
> target name lustre-MDTffff
> 4k blocks 1048576
> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O
> dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F
> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512
> -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576
> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg
>
> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256)
>
> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sze Chuan
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20101123/d749f0e7/attachment.html
Because of the naming convention, it doesn''t recognize the Lustre one as an "upgrade". Remove the redhat one with "rpm -e" first (or less desirably, use -- force to install over the top of the redhat one) Kevin On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Sze Chuan <sze.chuan at gmail.com> wrote:> I couldn''t install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. > Any idea to go about doing it? > > Here''s my output: > > rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm > Preparing... > ########################################### [100%] > file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from > package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com > > wrote: > is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? > looks not. > > On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on >> the block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre -- >> fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the >> following error at the output. >> >> I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. >> >> Output: >> >> Permanent disk data: >> Target: lustre-MDTffff >> Index: unassigned >> Lustre FS: lustre >> Mount type: ldiskfs >> Flags: 0x75 >> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) >> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro >> Parameters: >> >> checking for existing Lustre data: not found >> device size = 4096MB >> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS >> target name lustre-MDTffff >> 4k blocks 1048576 >> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O >> dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F >> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 >> -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 >> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg >> >> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) >> >> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 >> >> Thank you. >> >> Sze Chuan >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20101122/b1f430ec/attachment-0001.html
removing e2fsprogs from live system is difficult, because have many dependences. in that case better to check if e2fsprogs-devel package installed, and use force update for both package - e2fsprogs / e2fsprogs-devel (if need). but root case of that problem - Oracle use bad name for that package. Kevin - can you please add that issue in bugzilla and assign to Brian to fix it? this should be trivial fix in spec file + lbuild. On Nov 23, 2010, at 06:29, Kevin Van Maren wrote:> Because of the naming convention, it doesn''t recognize the Lustre one as an "upgrade". > > Remove the redhat one with "rpm -e" first (or less desirably, use --force to install over the top of the redhat one) > > Kevin > > > On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Sze Chuan <sze.chuan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I couldn''t install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. Any idea to go about doing it? >> >> Here''s my output: >> >> rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm >> Preparing... ########################################### [100%] >> file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com> wrote: >> is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? >> looks not. >> >> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on the block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the following error at the output. >>> >>> I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. >>> >>> Output: >>> >>> Permanent disk data: >>> Target: lustre-MDTffff >>> Index: unassigned >>> Lustre FS: lustre >>> Mount type: ldiskfs >>> Flags: 0x75 >>> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) >>> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro >>> Parameters: >>> >>> checking for existing Lustre data: not found >>> device size = 4096MB >>> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS >>> target name lustre-MDTffff >>> 4k blocks 1048576 >>> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F >>> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 >>> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg >>> >>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) >>> >>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> Sze Chuan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20101123/8b5e0711/attachment.html
Actually note that it is conflicting with existing ext4progs, not ext2, so should not be all that hard. Besides, lustre-enabled ext2 should have all the stuff that''s already in ext4progs I would imagine. On Nov 22, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Alexey Lyashkov wrote:> removing e2fsprogs from live system is difficult, because have many dependences. > in that case better to check if e2fsprogs-devel package installed, and use force update for both package - e2fsprogs / e2fsprogs-devel (if need). > but root case of that problem - Oracle use bad name for that package. > > Kevin - can you please add that issue in bugzilla and assign to Brian to fix it? this should be trivial fix in spec file + lbuild. > > > On Nov 23, 2010, at 06:29, Kevin Van Maren wrote: > >> Because of the naming convention, it doesn''t recognize the Lustre one as an "upgrade". >> >> Remove the redhat one with "rpm -e" first (or less desirably, use --force to install over the top of the redhat one) >> >> Kevin >> >> >> On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Sze Chuan <sze.chuan at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I couldn''t install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. Any idea to go about doing it? >>> >>> Here''s my output: >>> >>> rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm >>> Preparing... ########################################### [100%] >>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com> wrote: >>> is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? >>> looks not. >>> >>> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on the block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the following error at the output. >>>> >>>> I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. >>>> >>>> Output: >>>> >>>> Permanent disk data: >>>> Target: lustre-MDTffff >>>> Index: unassigned >>>> Lustre FS: lustre >>>> Mount type: ldiskfs >>>> Flags: 0x75 >>>> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) >>>> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro >>>> Parameters: >>>> >>>> checking for existing Lustre data: not found >>>> device size = 4096MB >>>> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS >>>> target name lustre-MDTffff >>>> 4k blocks 1048576 >>>> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F >>>> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 >>>> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg >>>> >>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) >>>> >>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> Sze Chuan >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
anyway. if package consists tools from different package you have two ways to make it work correctly. 1) divide package to sort of 2) add "Obsolete" line in spec file. In that situation - "Obsoletes" line best way (same way as used on RHEL6).>>># e4fsprogs was a parallel ext4-capable package in RHEL5.x %if 0%{?rhel} > 0 Obsoletes: e4fsprogs < %{version}-%{release} Provides: e4fsprogs = %{version}-%{release} %endif>>>On Nov 23, 2010, at 07:54, Oleg Drokin wrote:> Actually note that it is conflicting with existing ext4progs, not ext2, so should not be all that hard. > Besides, lustre-enabled ext2 should have all the stuff that''s already in ext4progs I would imagine. > > On Nov 22, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Alexey Lyashkov wrote: > >> removing e2fsprogs from live system is difficult, because have many dependences. >> in that case better to check if e2fsprogs-devel package installed, and use force update for both package - e2fsprogs / e2fsprogs-devel (if need). >> but root case of that problem - Oracle use bad name for that package. >> >> Kevin - can you please add that issue in bugzilla and assign to Brian to fix it? this should be trivial fix in spec file + lbuild. >> >> >> On Nov 23, 2010, at 06:29, Kevin Van Maren wrote: >> >>> Because of the naming convention, it doesn''t recognize the Lustre one as an "upgrade". >>> >>> Remove the redhat one with "rpm -e" first (or less desirably, use --force to install over the top of the redhat one) >>> >>> Kevin >>> >>> >>> On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Sze Chuan <sze.chuan at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I couldn''t install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. Any idea to go about doing it? >>>> >>>> Here''s my output: >>>> >>>> rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm >>>> Preparing... ########################################### [100%] >>>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com> wrote: >>>> is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? >>>> looks not. >>>> >>>> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on the block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the following error at the output. >>>>> >>>>> I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. >>>>> >>>>> Output: >>>>> >>>>> Permanent disk data: >>>>> Target: lustre-MDTffff >>>>> Index: unassigned >>>>> Lustre FS: lustre >>>>> Mount type: ldiskfs >>>>> Flags: 0x75 >>>>> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) >>>>> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro >>>>> Parameters: >>>>> >>>>> checking for existing Lustre data: not found >>>>> device size = 4096MB >>>>> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS >>>>> target name lustre-MDTffff >>>>> 4k blocks 1048576 >>>>> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F >>>>> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 >>>>> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg >>>>> >>>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) >>>>> >>>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> Sze Chuan >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list >>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Thanks people. Got it to work. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Alexey Lyashkov < alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com> wrote:> anyway. > if package consists tools from different package you have two ways to make > it work correctly. > 1) divide package to sort of > 2) add "Obsolete" line in spec file. > > In that situation - "Obsoletes" line best way (same way as used on RHEL6). > >>> > # e4fsprogs was a parallel ext4-capable package in RHEL5.x > %if 0%{?rhel} > 0 > Obsoletes: e4fsprogs < %{version}-%{release} > Provides: e4fsprogs = %{version}-%{release} > %endif > >>> > > On Nov 23, 2010, at 07:54, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > > Actually note that it is conflicting with existing ext4progs, not ext2, > so should not be all that hard. > > Besides, lustre-enabled ext2 should have all the stuff that''s already in > ext4progs I would imagine. > > > > On Nov 22, 2010, at 11:05 PM, Alexey Lyashkov wrote: > > > >> removing e2fsprogs from live system is difficult, because have many > dependences. > >> in that case better to check if e2fsprogs-devel package installed, and > use force update for both package - e2fsprogs / e2fsprogs-devel (if need). > >> but root case of that problem - Oracle use bad name for that package. > >> > >> Kevin - can you please add that issue in bugzilla and assign to Brian to > fix it? this should be trivial fix in spec file + lbuild. > >> > >> > >> On Nov 23, 2010, at 06:29, Kevin Van Maren wrote: > >> > >>> Because of the naming convention, it doesn''t recognize the Lustre one > as an "upgrade". > >>> > >>> Remove the redhat one with "rpm -e" first (or less desirably, use > --force to install over the top of the redhat one) > >>> > >>> Kevin > >>> > >>> > >>> On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Sze Chuan <sze.chuan at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I couldn''t install e2fsprogs using the rpm from the lustre website. > Any idea to go about doing it? > >>>> > >>>> Here''s my output: > >>>> > >>>> rpm -Uvh e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.oel5.x86_64.rpm > >>>> Preparing... > ########################################### [100%] > >>>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4 from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /sbin/fsck.ext4dev from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4 from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /sbin/mkfs.ext4dev from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/fsck.ext4dev.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> file /usr/share/man/man8/mkfs.ext4dev.8.gz from install of > e2fsprogs-1.41.12.2.ora1-0redhat.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > e4fsprogs-1.41.5-3.el5.x86_64 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Alexey Lyashkov < > alexey.lyashkov at clusterstor.com> wrote: > >>>> is you install e2fsprogs from lustre site? > >>>> looks not. > >>>> > >>>> On Nov 22, 2010, at 12:15, Sze Chuan wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> > >>>>> I''m new to Lustre and had trouble creating a MGS/MDT filesystem on > the block device. I entered the following command "mkfs.lustre > --fsname=lustre --mdt --mgs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS" but got the following > error at the output. > >>>>> > >>>>> I''m running Lustre 2.0 on OEL 5.4 x86_64. > >>>>> > >>>>> Output: > >>>>> > >>>>> Permanent disk data: > >>>>> Target: lustre-MDTffff > >>>>> Index: unassigned > >>>>> Lustre FS: lustre > >>>>> Mount type: ldiskfs > >>>>> Flags: 0x75 > >>>>> (MDT MGS needs_index first_time update ) > >>>>> Persistent mount opts: iopen_nopriv,user_xattr,errors=remount-ro > >>>>> Parameters: > >>>>> > >>>>> checking for existing Lustre data: not found > >>>>> device size = 4096MB > >>>>> formatting backing filesystem ldiskfs on /dev/VolGroup00/MDS > >>>>> target name lustre-MDTffff > >>>>> 4k blocks 1048576 > >>>>> options -J size=160 -i 4096 -I 512 -q -O > dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F > >>>>> mkfs_cmd = mke2fs -j -b 4096 -L lustre-MDTffff -J size=160 -i 4096 > -I 512 -q -O dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg -F /dev/VolGroup00/MDS 1048576 > >>>>> Invalid filesystem option set: dir_index,dirdata,uninit_bg > >>>>> > >>>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: Unable to build fs /dev/VolGroup00/MDS (256) > >>>>> > >>>>> mkfs.lustre FATAL: mkfs failed 256 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thank you. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sze Chuan > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list > >>>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > >>>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Lustre-discuss mailing list > >>>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > >>>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Lustre-discuss mailing list > >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20101123/2b9123cd/attachment-0001.html