yangsheng
2010-Aug-27 15:29 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Fwd: Re: Announce: Lustre 1.8.4 is available!
> > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Announce: Lustre 1.8.4 is available! > Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:00:46 -0700 > From: Jay Lan <jay.zen.lan at gmail.com> > To: Terry Rutledge <terry.rutledge at oracle.com> > CC: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > > > > Hi, > > I generated v1_8_2 tag build area and v1_8_4 tag build area from > the git tree. > > The kernel_patches/series/2.6-rhel5.series in both areas are identical, > and each patch listed in the series file are identical using ''diff''. >Do you sure they are identical? We should remove a few patches for v1_8_4.> Isn''t there any new lustre kernel patch against rhel5.5 committed > between these two releases? All patches were rolled into > kernel-2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 already? >Indeed, no new patch commited for rhel5.5. As i said above, just a few patches be removed and a few patches changes to eliminate conflict. For v1_8_2 should still using rhel5.4. For v1_8_4, already updated to rhel5.5. Regards, YangSheng> > Terry Rutledge wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Lustre 1.8.4 is available on the Oracle Download Center Site. > > > > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/indexes/downloads/sun-az-index-095901.html#L > > > > The change log can be read here: > > > > http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Use:Change_Log_1.8 > > > > Here are some items that may interest you in this release: > > > > * Changes to support matrix > > - Update RHEL5.5 kernel to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 > > Update OEL5.5 kernel to 2.6.18-194.3.1.0.1.el5. > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22514 > > - Add support for OFED 1.5.1. > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20619 > > NOTE: RHEL5 & OEL5 rpms provided on the download site > > are built against the in-kernel OFED driver. > > > > * Significant Bugs > > - Fix bug in orphan recovery which can cause the same OST > > object to be allocated to two different files. > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17485 > > - Fix multiple issues related to the grant space. The > > problem manifests itself as an OST failing write > > requests with ENOSPC while some free space remains. > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22755 > > - The dlm_locks slab can grow significantly and consumes > > a lot of memory on the server. This is fixed by imposing > > an hardlimit to grant_plan. > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22476 > > > > * Lustre Sysadmins may also be interested in the details of: > > - https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22455 > > - https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15252 > > - https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22481 > > (which Andreas mentioned in his LUG presentation) > > > > As always, you can report issues via Bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/ > > > > Our next anticipated release is Lustre 1.8.5 in {put date here}. > > > > To access earlier releases of Lustre, please check the box > > "See previous products(P)", then click "L" or scroll down to > > "Lustre", the current and all previous releases (1.8.0 - 1.8.4) > > will be displayed. > > > > Happy downloading! > > > > -- The Lustre Team -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > > >
Mag Gam
2010-Sep-01 11:12 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] Fwd: Re: Announce: Lustre 1.8.4 is available!
I am curious, is there a Oracle roadmap similar to what Sun was providing? On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:29 AM, yangsheng <Sheng.Yang at sun.com> wrote:> >> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: ? ? ?Re: [Lustre-discuss] Announce: Lustre 1.8.4 is available! >> Date: ? ? ? ? Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:00:46 -0700 >> From: ? ? ? ? Jay Lan <jay.zen.lan at gmail.com> >> To: ? Terry Rutledge <terry.rutledge at oracle.com> >> CC: ? lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I generated v1_8_2 tag build area and v1_8_4 tag build area from >> the git tree. >> >> The kernel_patches/series/2.6-rhel5.series in both areas are identical, >> and each patch listed in the series file are identical using ''diff''. >> > Do you sure they are identical? We should remove a few patches for v1_8_4. >> Isn''t there any new lustre kernel patch against rhel5.5 ?committed >> between these two releases? All patches were rolled into >> kernel-2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 already? >> > Indeed, no new patch commited for rhel5.5. As i said above, just a few > patches be removed and a few patches changes to eliminate conflict. For > v1_8_2 should still using rhel5.4. For v1_8_4, already updated to rhel5.5. > > > Regards, > YangSheng >> >> Terry Rutledge wrote: >> > ? Hi all, >> > >> > Lustre 1.8.4 is available on the Oracle Download Center Site. >> > >> > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/indexes/downloads/sun-az-index-095901.html#L >> > >> > The change log can be read here: >> > >> > http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Use:Change_Log_1.8 >> > >> > Here are some items that may interest you in this release: >> > >> > * Changes to support matrix >> > ? ? ?- Update RHEL5.5 kernel to 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5 >> > ? ? ? ?Update OEL5.5 kernel to 2.6.18-194.3.1.0.1.el5. >> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22514 >> > ? ? ?- Add support for OFED 1.5.1. >> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20619 >> > ? ? ? ?NOTE: RHEL5 & OEL5 rpms provided on the download site >> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ?are built against the in-kernel OFED driver. >> > >> > * Significant Bugs >> > ? ? ?- Fix bug in orphan recovery which can cause the same OST >> > ? ? ? ?object to be allocated to two different files. >> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17485 >> > ? ? ?- Fix multiple issues related to the grant space. ?The >> > ? ? ? ?problem manifests itself as an OST failing write >> > ? ? ? ?requests with ENOSPC while some free space remains. >> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22755 >> > ? ? ?- The dlm_locks slab can grow significantly and consumes >> > ? ? ? ?a lot of memory on the server. This is fixed by imposing >> > ? ? ? ?an hardlimit to grant_plan. >> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22476 >> > >> > * Lustre Sysadmins may also be interested in the details of: >> > ? ? ?- https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22455 >> > ? ? ?- https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15252 >> > ? ? ?- https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22481 >> > ? ? ? ?(which Andreas mentioned in his LUG presentation) >> > >> > As always, you can report issues via Bugzilla: >> > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/ >> > >> > Our next anticipated release is Lustre 1.8.5 in {put date here}. >> > >> > To access earlier releases of Lustre, please check the box >> > "See previous products(P)", then click "L" or scroll down to >> > "Lustre", the current and all previous releases (1.8.0 - 1.8.4) >> > will be displayed. >> > >> > Happy downloading! >> > >> > -- The Lustre Team -- >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Lustre-discuss mailing list >> > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> > >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Hi all, for some of our OSSes a massive amount of errors like: Sep 2 20:28:15 jf61o02 kernel: blk_rq_check_limits: over max size limit. appearing in /var/log/messages (and dmesg). Does anyone have got a clue how-to get of the root cause? Many thanks in advance. Cheers -Frank Heckes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH 52425 Juelich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender), Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------