Hi Everyone! As you see, the newest HPC top 500 list (June 2010) has already been published. Is there anybody who could give us a statistical data about the number that lustre has been used in the top 10 and top 20 HPC list and the ratio that lustre has been used in the top 500 HPC list? Thanks! Yuksam Cheung 2010-06-08 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20100608/82f55fcc/attachment.html
Hi there I have been informally compiling these metrics for the top100 but I do not have contacts at all the sites (and some site names are anonymized on the list). According to my data, 7/10 of the top10 run Lustre and at least 60/100 of the top 100 run Lustre. There are a number of other sites that I think quite likely to run Lustre, but I have no way of confirming. If anyone subscribed to this list works at a top100 site then I would be delighted to hear confirmation of your Lustre usage (reply directly to me not to the list). This data will only be used in an aggregated anonymized fashion. Regards PJones Tonney Kaiven Cheung wrote:> Hi Everyone! > > As you see, the newest HPC top 500 list (June 2010) has already been > published. Is there anybody who could give us a statistical data > about the number that lustre has been used in the top 10 and top 20 > HPC list and the ratio that lustre has been used in the top 500 HPC > list? Thanks! > > Yuksam Cheung > 2010-06-08 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Hi Peter - DDN, being a active participant with many of the world''s largest sites running Lustre, maintains a fairly rigorous record of the top10/50/100/500. We''re not quite done closing the loop on the most current list, but here''s the metrics as we see them right now: 52/100 run Lustre 22/100 run GPFS 3/100 running PanFS 1/100 running CXFS 17/100 are still to be determined (unknown) DDN is, of course, honored to be part of so many Lustre systems ( associated with ~50% of the world''s top100 systems ) and announced just this week several up and coming systems that will place in upcoming lists. I''ll post more as we have more intelligence. Best, Jeff Jeff Denworth VP, Marketing DataDirect Networks, Inc. On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Peter Bojanic wrote:> Begin forwarded message: > >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:31:10 -0700 >> From: Peter Jones <peter.x.jones at oracle.com> >> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] about the top500 list >> To: Tonney Kaiven Cheung <zhangys04 at gmail.com> >> Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> Message-ID: <4C0E8C6E.1010309 at oracle.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Hi there >> >> I have been informally compiling these metrics for the top100 but I do >> not have contacts at all the sites (and some site names are anonymized >> on the list). According to my data, 7/10 of the top10 run Lustre and at >> least 60/100 of the top 100 run Lustre. There are a number of other >> sites that I think quite likely to run Lustre, but I have no way of >> confirming. >> >> If anyone subscribed to this list works at a top100 site then I would be >> delighted to hear confirmation of your Lustre usage (reply directly to >> me not to the list). This data will only be used in an aggregated >> anonymized fashion. >> >> Regards >> >> PJones >
Thanks Jeff. I have been focusing on Lustre Y\N for my purposes, and am down to 6 sites that I am not sure what they run, but it is not Lustre, and 8 sites that I do not know for certain but suspect it is Lustre. I agree with your numbers on CXFS, PanFS and GPFS. My total presently stands at 59/100 sites running Lustre. Jeff Denworth wrote:> Hi Peter - > > DDN, being a active participant with many of the world''s largest sites running Lustre, maintains a fairly rigorous record of the top10/50/100/500. We''re not quite done closing the loop on the most current list, but here''s the metrics as we see them right now: > 52/100 run Lustre > 22/100 run GPFS > 3/100 running PanFS > 1/100 running CXFS > 17/100 are still to be determined (unknown) > > DDN is, of course, honored to be part of so many Lustre systems ( associated with ~50% of the world''s top100 systems ) and announced just this week several up and coming systems that will place in upcoming lists. I''ll post more as we have more intelligence. > > Best, > > Jeff > > Jeff Denworth > VP, Marketing > DataDirect Networks, Inc. > > On Jun 9, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Peter Bojanic wrote: > > >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> >>> Message: 2 >>> Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:31:10 -0700 >>> From: Peter Jones <peter.x.jones at oracle.com> >>> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] about the top500 list >>> To: Tonney Kaiven Cheung <zhangys04 at gmail.com> >>> Cc: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >>> Message-ID: <4C0E8C6E.1010309 at oracle.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >>> >>> Hi there >>> >>> I have been informally compiling these metrics for the top100 but I do >>> not have contacts at all the sites (and some site names are anonymized >>> on the list). According to my data, 7/10 of the top10 run Lustre and at >>> least 60/100 of the top 100 run Lustre. There are a number of other >>> sites that I think quite likely to run Lustre, but I have no way of >>> confirming. >>> >>> If anyone subscribed to this list works at a top100 site then I would be >>> delighted to hear confirmation of your Lustre usage (reply directly to >>> me not to the list). This data will only be used in an aggregated >>> anonymized fashion. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> PJones >>> > > >