David.Wang at Sun.COM
2010-Jan-08 03:11 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre 1.6.7.2 support RHEL 4.7 client?
hi folks, can you please confirm if RHEL 4.7 works well as lustre 1.6.7.2 client? i checked support matrix, http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Lustre_Release_Information#Lustre_Support_Matrix it tells *Kernel / Version 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL * is ok for RHEL 4. any detail info about RHEL 4.7? thanks and regards, david -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20100108/7a1222bd/attachment.html
Peter Kjellstrom
2010-Jan-08 08:51 UTC
[Lustre-discuss] lustre 1.6.7.2 support RHEL 4.7 client?
On Friday 08 January 2010, David.Wang at sun.com wrote:> hi folks, > > can you please confirm if RHEL 4.7 > works well as lustre 1.6.7.2 client?We run ~200 older x86_64 cluster nodes on: 1.6.7.2-2.6.9_89.0.11.ELsmp_200909161434(patchless) We''ve had no problems with this combo but this is on CentOS-4.8 (not pure RHEL). Also it''s somewhat of a trivial setup since we only use tcp transport and no complications such as quota. Before 4.8 we ran 4.7 but I''m not 100% on lustre version used then (probably 1.6.7.1). /Peter> i checked support matrix, > > http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php/Lustre_Release_Information#Lustre_Support_ >Matrix > > it tells *Kernel / Version 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL * is ok for RHEL 4. any > detail info about > RHEL 4.7? > > thanks and regards, > david-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20100108/386bc0db/attachment.bin