we have 1.6.7 clients and are wondering if they''ll talk to 1.8.1.1 servers. Ideas? ---------------- John White High Performance Computing Services (HPCS) (510) 486-7307 One Cyclotron Rd, MS: 50B-3209C Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley, CA 94720
On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:49 -0800, John White wrote:> we have 1.6.7 clients and are wondering if they''ll talk to 1.8.1.1 > servers.I''m not sure if we''ve qualified this specific pair, but there is nothing I know of in either of those releases that should prevent it. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20091106/0dac4cc5/attachment.bin
Brian, Yes we did verify interoperability between, 1.6.7 and 1.8.1.1., as part of the QE release process. Regards, J.D. Brian J. Murrell wrote:> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:49 -0800, John White wrote: > >> we have 1.6.7 clients and are wondering if they''ll talk to 1.8.1.1 >> servers. >> > > I''m not sure if we''ve qualified this specific pair, but there is nothing > I know of in either of those releases that should prevent it. > > b. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
Let me be more precise, 1.6.7.3 and 1.8.1.1 were verified. We only test the latest from each branch. J.D. Brian J. Murrell wrote:> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:49 -0800, John White wrote: > >> we have 1.6.7 clients and are wondering if they''ll talk to 1.8.1.1 >> servers. >> > > I''m not sure if we''ve qualified this specific pair, but there is nothing > I know of in either of those releases that should prevent it. > > b. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 08:05 -0700, JD Neumann wrote:> Brian, > Yes we did verify interoperability between, 1.6.7 and 1.8.1.1., as part > of the QE release process.J.D. That is great! That should help John out in his task. b. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20091106/0c377f83/attachment.bin
1.6.7.3 has not been released. Was this 1.6.7.2 or something from CVS? Kevin JD Neumann wrote:> Let me be more precise, 1.6.7.3 and 1.8.1.1 were verified. We only test > the latest from each branch. > J.D. > > Brian J. Murrell wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:49 -0800, John White wrote: >> >> >>> we have 1.6.7 clients and are wondering if they''ll talk to 1.8.1.1 >>> servers. >>> >>> >> I''m not sure if we''ve qualified this specific pair, but there is nothing >> I know of in either of those releases that should prevent it. >> >> b. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >