Lustre discuss - Jun 2009 - Lustre has a critical bug with OFED 1.4.1?

Hello

On OFED mailing-list, Tziporet Koren, from Mellanox, told that "there is 
a request from Sun to have bug fixes only release since there is a 
critical bug that prevent Lustre to run over OFED 1.4 and 1.4.1*"
and so a OFED 1.4.2 version was needed.

I never heard about this issue, what is it?

-- 
Aurelien Degremont
CEA

On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 17:07 +0200, Aurelien Degremont
wrote:
> Hello
> 
> On OFED mailing-list, Tziporet Koren, from Mellanox, told that "there
is
> a request from Sun to have bug fixes only release since there is a 
> critical bug that prevent Lustre to run over OFED 1.4 and 1.4.1*"
> and so a OFED 1.4.2 version was needed.
> 
> I never heard about this issue, what is it?
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1650
https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1655

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20090626/ab84d78d/attachment.bin

Brian J. Murrell a ?crit :
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 17:07 +0200, Aurelien Degremont wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> On OFED mailing-list, Tziporet Koren, from Mellanox, told that
"there is
>> a request from Sun to have bug fixes only release since there is a 
>> critical bug that prevent Lustre to run over OFED 1.4 and 1.4.1*"
>> and so a OFED 1.4.2 version was needed.
>>
>> I never heard about this issue, what is it?
> 
> https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1650
> https://bugs.openfabrics.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1655
Thanks a lot. So only SLES 10 and RHEL4 are impacted?
Fine for RHEL5?



-- 
Aurelien Degremont
CEA

On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 17:49 +0200, Aurelien Degremont
wrote:
> 
> Thanks a lot.
NP.
> So only SLES 10 and RHEL4 are impacted?
Yes, it appears so at this point.
> Fine for RHEL5?
Should be.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20090626/12d3240e/attachment.bin

OFED 1.4.1 had a bug which prevented build of external kernel modules
against it. Is it fixed now. I know I may be out of bounds in asking this
here. Has any one tried compiling lustre (kernel, modules) against OFED
1.4.1

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at
sun.com>wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 17:49 +0200, Aurelien Degremont wrote:
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
>
> NP.
>
> > So only SLES 10 and RHEL4 are impacted?
>
> Yes, it appears so at this point.
>
> > Fine for RHEL5?
>
> Should be.
>
> b.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>

-- 
Rishi Pathak
Pune-Maharastra (India)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20090711/e5466106/attachment.html

On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 10:55 +0530, rishi pathak wrote:
> OFED 1.4.1 had a bug which prevented build of external kernel modules
> against it.
No.  OFED 1.4.0, not 1.4.1.
> Is it fixed now.
Yes.  OFED 1.4.1 fixed it.
> know I may be out of bounds in asking this here. Has any one tried
> compiling lustre (kernel, modules) against OFED 1.4.1 
Yes.  We (Sun) did.  We released a 1.8.0.1 which includes OFED 1.4.1.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20090713/c980c8fc/attachment.bin