I remember reading that there is an 8TB limit per OSS in 1.6.6. Is this correct, and if not what is the limit per OSS? Are there plans on increasing that limit in the future? -- Ben Evans ben at terascala.com Principal Engineer Terascala Inc. Office: 508-588-1501 x223 www.terascala.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20090325/5fadb2f1/attachment-0001.html
Ben Evans wrote, On 2009. 03. 25. 14:45:> > I remember reading that there is an 8TB limit per OSS in 1.6.6. Is > this correct, and if not what is the limit per OSS? >I think the limit is for OST, if I''m not confused about definitions. tamas
I was under the impression that the 8TB limit was per OST, not per OSS, and that it was due to ext3 limitations. I could be wrong, but that was my understanding. Robert Hendelman Jr Magnetar Capital LLC Rob.Hendelman at magnetar.com 1-847-905-4557 The information contained in this message and its attachments is intended only for the private and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e- mail is strictly prohibited.
Correct. Limit should be increased to 16TB when ldiskfs is migrated to ext4. Kevin Papp Tam?s wrote:> Ben Evans wrote, On 2009. 03. 25. 14:45: > >> I remember reading that there is an 8TB limit per OSS in 1.6.6. Is >> this correct, and if not what is the limit per OSS? >> >> > > I think the limit is for OST, if I''m not confused about definitions. > > tamas > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss >