Lustre discuss - Mar 2009 - RHEL4 build of lustre patched e2fsprogs

I am trying to install the a newer version of e2fsprogs to see if the  
e2scan in newer versions were built with sqlite (the rpm I got when I  
built the cluster did not).

The new rpm:
e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64.rpm

Appears to built against versions of berkdb  (not sqlite now?) that  
is newer than is part of RHEL4.
error: Failed dependencies:
         libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) is needed by  
e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64
         libdb-4.3.so()(64bit) is needed by  
e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64
         rtld(GNU_HASH) is needed by  
e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64


up2date says that db4-4.2  is all that is available of rhel4 stock  
from redhat with updates. Not 4.3  not good.
The libc error is funny also because as far as I can tell /lib64/ 
libc.so.6  is just that...

In any-case, I could only install if I said nodeps,  but that is  
getting just silly.

Does anyone have a working patched e2fsprogs from rhel4?

Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
Center for Advanced Computing
brockp at umich.edu
(734)936-1985

Brock,

I also recently noticed their binary was a bit broken or built against a
different RHEL4 "update". I just rebuilt the SRPM.

Daire 

----- "Brock Palen" <brockp at umich.edu> wrote:
> I am trying to install the a newer version of e2fsprogs to see if the 
> 
> e2scan in newer versions were built with sqlite (the rpm I got when I 
> 
> built the cluster did not).
> 
> The new rpm:
> e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64.rpm
> 
> Appears to built against versions of berkdb  (not sqlite now?) that  
> is newer than is part of RHEL4.
> error: Failed dependencies:
>          libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) is needed by  
> e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64
>          libdb-4.3.so()(64bit) is needed by  
> e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64
>          rtld(GNU_HASH) is needed by  
> e2fsprogs-1.40.11.sun1-0redhat.x86_64
> 
> 
> up2date says that db4-4.2  is all that is available of rhel4 stock  
> from redhat with updates. Not 4.3  not good.
> The libc error is funny also because as far as I can tell /lib64/ 
> libc.so.6  is just that...
> 
> In any-case, I could only install if I said nodeps,  but that is  
> getting just silly.
> 
> Does anyone have a working patched e2fsprogs from rhel4?
> 
> Brock Palen
> www.umich.edu/~brockp
> Center for Advanced Computing
> brockp at umich.edu
> (734)936-1985
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss